latest

brainstorm/WhatHumansFindAndDeclare.md

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# Humans finding meaning and declaring their existence
+
+Humans have a need to leave a mark which informs of the observation of the Universe. To inscribe into the fabric of time the declaration that existence was indeed noticed and contemplated upon.
+https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-23/edition-4/nonexistent-purpose-people
+
+# Creation compels creation
+That there was something created is cause to therefore create more.
+If nothing had been created then there would be no choice to create or not create.
+What does this tell us about the origins of creation

new/dimensional_morality.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+all things Korean
+my wife is Korean
+daehan mingug
+I associate a particular set of colours as being Korean colours
+and it was because of some of the books, notepaper, pens, writing utensils, bags, pencil case, small tools some sort of objects that were small and utilities of some sort
+stationary
+in any case, I saw certain colours which I came to associate as being normal Korean colours, as it was my first time dealing with a Korean person ( my wife) in real life, and she seemed to have these objects
+the colours were pink, pale grey, and perhaps peach or flesh coloured
+I later saw these again when I was examining different syntax themes for Vim
+they had a colour scheme called Seoul 256, and it was indeed these same colours
+now it's totally possible htat I simply fooled myself into believing these are the same set of colours
+but it really seemed as though the some of those were carrying over from my previous experiences
+obviously I recognize the path of bias available simply because of the name of the vim colourscheme
+but nevertheless, I felt really convinced by htis association and Iw onder if it has any truth to it
+exit
+here we go
+having a conversation again
+talking about shapes the shape of the universe, the shape of the human experience
+the shapes of things we can perceive, shapes of movement
+are shapes of movement analogous to shapes of thought
+are shapes of thought analogous to patterns of behaviour
+value judgments
+axioms producing the forms of patterns observed to occur
+how do these things all tie into one another? is it based on the manner in which the human mind can conceive of things? or is it that manner in which things can exist as a whole?
+would such patterns be morally different in a Universe which had a different number of dimensions?
+How could that occur? How could that be ascertained? would someone have to exist in a dimension whose properties were such that the dimensions of movement and conception available is equal to that of the dimension with the higher number of dimensions out of the set of dimensions being observed?
+How do we go about making that distinction?
+can we produce postulates from a Universe with a lesser number of dimensions?
+would we still be able to infer any morality, and if so especially the same morality, as that which is inferrable within the Universe of greater dimensions to those who inhabit it?
+If we are to understand human experience, biological experience, within the properties of our 3+T Dimension Universe, then we understand that having dimensions allows for movement of matter, such that the conception of change can occur, by material transformation expressed as a valence of vector matrices across said dimensions
+and that, because of this, the transformations include the movement of energy and matter into the manifestation of stars and planets, with behaviours producing an increase in the complexity of material components to the point of evolving organic life and the human experience
+a declared observation of the material transformations, and likely transformations occurring beyond what can only be perceived as material transformation. Nevertheless, a declaration that such transformations have been observed, and that these include the transformations to which, at some level of observation, a human is perceiving the universe through a composed field of observation into which the experience of the human body is intrinsically bound
+such that there are mechanisms being influenced within that system of experience of that one perceptual instance that are not perceptible to the same level of direction by other perceptual instances, and which influence the observation taking place within the perceptual instance
+these include the experience of respiration, neuromuscular activation, neurochemical adaptation, reception of sensorial input, mechanisms to affect the environment, and so forth
+How do we posit that such things are not merely the same experience with an additional degree of dynamism?
+exit

new/manufacturing_visual_matrices.md

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+somehow, we always seem to run into a logistical catastrophe with this garage in the sense that there is no communication, and a very low probability that someone will answer the phone when we call in
+so we know why humans do this to themselves
+but do you?
+xit
+exit
+here we go again
+let's talka bout this a little more
+in particular, we need to talk about learning
+about the mind's ability to abstract
+and how the utilization of this ability within one domain is able to influence behaviour in another domain
+how does the mind ultimately make sense of each activity
+is it always a visual representation?
+we need to take this a bit further and talk about other ways in which visual representations affect the human experience
+the condition of all biological beings, perhaps
+and that is, if we talk about how we represent everything visually
+even if we are perceiving the auditory, we are able to confer a set of matrices by which to represent something visually
+or at least, that which could be quantified through values which would occupy such matrices, and have their transformations quantified in kind
+nevertheless, we are able to do this and it is likely influenced by whatever a given point of focus happens to be
+especially as it translates through one's experience within a human form
+so in the case of auditory perception, we are able to infor the set of matrices as per the dimensional properties of the auditory experience
+in this case, the shape and ridges of the ear, its canals, any significant structure which directly or indirectly pertains, but is able to affect the movement of air
+in this case, if the theory is correct, we are able to inform what would be a visual representation borne of these matrices
+exit

new/politically_corrupt_discourse.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+where is the dividing line between political discourse and all discourse
+is all discourse political? what makes it political?
+that it relates to public affairs and governance
+so then that means that everything can be political, from the moment that there is any sort of community
+so when we say that there is a corrupt political discourse, or that political discourse is inherently corruptible, that isn't necessarily the case
+sure we can say that it has a tendency to become corrupt
+but it is us who becomes corrupt
+we need to keep our eyes on the ball
+we need to understand what it is we are seeking, what we are deliberating over
+if we already have an understanding that there is political side which is more or less correct, then we have lost that integrity
+ythere is no way to uncover the good ideas if there is any sort of preconceived division over the issue wherein there are beliefs that one side has a less incorrect understanding of it
+but, we nevertheless DO need to engage these issues, because it affects us regardless of whether we attempt to guide the discourse or not
+when others have the discourse, it affects us, at least in theory it should
+now, one could make the argument that one's own pursuits are more important and yield effects whose significance is so great that the effect of the political discourse does not even register at scale
+but that is a separate discussion
+and it still doesn't solve the circumstance of subjects which, regardless of their being political, are important for one to have discourse over
+to formulate na opinion about
+as that exists, there is still a need to have discourse which may or may not be believed to be political
+so then we come full circle and enter back into a recurring behaviour
+and yet somehow we believe that we can make progress doing this, by supporting or participating in a process which deems itself to be refining the governance of all people, including ourselves
+but what if that process of refinement is inching us closer towards the exact circumstances which we posit to be the motivation for the discourse in the first place, then it becomes an unreasonable proposition 
+and to do it recurringly is a proposition for insanity
+so why would we wish to engage with that? is there not something more productive to be done? yes - it would have to be the conceptualization of solutions and the seeking of their development
+and we can do that independently, we needn't a politically charged body to support us
+we needn't utilize politics to manipulate those who would otherwise impede our effort into accepting or, as is more the case in the current time, supporting them
+politically_corrupt_discourse.md
+exit

new/visualizing_in_the_face_of_complexity.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+Our ability to perceive the world is based on a few factors
+but one of them is probably our ability to create visual representations for phenomena, map out expectations of their transformations, and observe this being fulfilled
+there is likely a manner in which a geometric resolution occurs from which we derive particular meanings
+or meaning itself
+now, if we are overburdened with complexity, as what might be experienced during an overloaded psychedelic experience, this would impede our ability to maintain the producion of the visual manifestations which we correlate with our perceived experience
+thus this would send us into deep fear
+DISAMBIGUATE
+exit