new

new/Distasteful_Discussions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+Discussions that could be so useful, if only certain pitfalls were avoided.
+
+That we could talk about deeper values, methodologies, what actual transformations take place. Instead it is always the same representation of a walled institutional narrative which proclaims as though it has never spoken before. These narratives always miss the mark of conducting themselves in the locale of greatest interest, and that could be forgiven if only it wasn't shutting down other inquiry. In the case of motifs, which are perhaps too deeply embedded in the human experience to be considered "mere motif" (disambiguate) -it is not enuogh to simply say that something is unjust or that something which happened in one's ancestry was injust. This is a neverending game, no matter where it is played. So for the reasons we need to examine why and how these particular pursuits are coming into being, the mechanism, the rationale, at a more semantically complete level, and then deliberate over the values being proposed.
+Instead, we get a relegated assumption that people's experiences are different on the basis of an arbitrary characteristic, while also pretending experiences to otherwise be equal in other circumstances. Relegating us, inevitably, into groups which facilitate a move towards what one might call a set of interesting names, all of which bearin notoriety in the disregard for human life -> Both in mortal measure, and also in conception. Nevertheless, we are kept from making such dinstinctins, and instead we create unnecessary conflict in bad taste, and with some expense. So, if there is a high resource requirement for proper conduct, and a high risk of insufficient conduct, then it becomes an irrational pursuit. The proposition is so distasteful that even describing it and its challenges seems like an undesirable and irrational endeavour.
+
+How to rectify this?
+Is this to be rectified?
+Why? For What?

new/DougStory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+why is it that my memories and my thoughts about family
+are never positive?
+is it because of myself? am I just a bad person? Have I been suppressing evil parts of myself, but they are so strong that they keep coming to the surface
+and so when I even try to just think about something which reminds me of my family, I instantly begin to have thoughts which cause me to evaluate their moral conduct and intentions
+their value systems
+and, in doing so, I find that I have very little variety in my emotions
+they're almost completely forms of resentment
+and the values which I deduce seem to always be narcissism and self-interest, often at the expense of people's well-being
+or, if not interacting with anyone in a direct fashion
+sssssssssssss
+exit
+what were we talking about
+we had a conversation about my story with Douglas Falconer, Chad Trottier and Christophe Parent
+where we went to the school park/playgrounds between Robert Hopkins and Thomas d'Arcy McGee elementary schools
+and how I utilized a preamble to set the tone for the exercise
+arranging the mind and the mood
+how I suggested very particular activities
+and coordinated the positions of each of us
+how I improvised an act, a play of sorts, to demonstrate the abilities of certain suggested beings in a suggested Universe or dimension
+I think dimension was the wrod I chose at the time
+how I tried to hypnotize Doug, and how that might have been successful, or he might have just gone along with the ploy
+suspended his belief of reality
+suspended his trust in his own ability to make sense of a world
+and to allow suggestions to come into hsi mind which didn't require any sort of validation which he might otherwise apply
+it was a trust in friendship
+but it almost seemed like a truyst in what exists beyond reality
+possibly an egg could have been set to hatch at just that moment, an egg which would have arrived from the media of the time
+the films and shows we were watching
+hence where the "dimension" nomenclature might have been derived
+this left him in a vulnerable state, where we could attempt to perform actions to which he would otherwise protest
+and perform we did, especially my compadres, who, without Douglas noticing, or being able to react to, clipped his rat tail, a very distinguished feature at tehe time, from his head 
+in any case it shows a process by which a human enters into a hypnotic state, even if they are being a part of it, and my thinking is that it might always require the human to sort of be willing to go laong with it, on some level, if not consciously
+and that this brings them into a state where they can receive divine information
+or what they might see as information which goes beyond the normal conception or eality
+in this state, they can see visions, receive wisdom (argue this), and have a dramatic shift in thinking
+and that we sort of access somethign s imilar, though likely much more profound (by mean), when someone utilizes particular psychedelic substances / psychoactive compounds
+but that we have different pathways to get there
+some by going to the bodyt in repeated activities
+breath
+isolation chambers / sensory deprivation
+meditation
+hypnotism 
+psychedelic substances
+fever
+extreme stress
+extreme pain is something we could add to that last one
+and what else.. that's probably just about it without getting aliens into the picutre or something more extreme
+visions from God or an unknown entity perhaps
+divine energy, outside what is postulated as something to "suggest" towards the divine, such as the hypnosis previously described
+but some sort of legitimately substantive divine energy which can produce events or effects that are completely unknown
+exit

new/brain_improvisation__parallels_with_loation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+so if I remember correctly
+in talking about neuroscience and musical improvisation
+the so it would seem that the primary associated brain configuration, which is known, that can be applied to the act of improvising, vs playing memorized music, is the inhibition of the temporoparietal parts of the brain
+whereas the medial pre-frontal cortex would increase in activation
+that would make sense, conceptually, as you would expect the mind to be ignoring some of the surrounding parts of the world
+and to try and internalize the focus
+but it's interesting that the activation pattern, for directed awareness, is such that it coincides with the locations of things in 3d space
+you are emphasizing the parts of focus, which focus through the eyes (remembering that the eyes are sending visual information whcih is processed by the occipital lobe), and the need to focus on in the mind is close to the eyes, which can't do anything but try to focus
+then thre is an inhibition of the temporoparietal lobe, or the part of the brain which is closer to the outter sides of the middle range of the brain
+and it would make sense that, if we're thinking about lovcation, tha tattention to our surroundings and peripherae would be inhibited, in order to not disrupt performance
+but are there ways in which we can activate these parts of the brain to improve performance?
+or even to use them for something else which doesn't have the same random element to it which makes awareness to others unpredictable
+exit

new/objectification.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+here we go again
+what are the other things we've been thinknig about
+how about something which doesn't bring about resentment or despair
+about something which makes us look forward with optimism
+which makes us hope for greater things
+whcih makes us see the whole instead of ourselves
+which makes us love outwardly instead of looking inward with suspicion and perhaps some animosity
+the animosity for one's state of being
+but no need to dwell on that
+such things are always a matter of perspective
+a matter of mindset
+and if one can transcend at all, one can create motion which brings one out of such a toxic and stagnant way of being
+so onward we go and onward we move
+to understand the human mind we were talking about the possible states of being 
+and we infer some of these states by our understanding of physics
+we know that there are geometric realities which can be observed at different scales
+and that there are more pronounced aspects of the material behaviour at different scales
+but we can understand, at the very least, the scale within which we operate
+and at this scale we understand that we deal with objects and transformations
+and that these objects aren't necessarily completely isolated constructions
+that our objectification of them occurs at different levels of analyis and that the meaning of an object can change in ways which may or may not undo a previous objectiification of that same set of material components
+in the sense that there can be an evolution to understanding an object
+and the meaning it bears, as well as its utility, and whatever narrative or story is required in order to make such things understood by the being
+but, also, that the object might also interact with the world in other ways
+either by having, for example, a different use
+or, because its relationship to another object or aspect of the environment can cause it to be conceived as yet another object
+this doesn't necessarily need to be an evolution which removes the understanding of its previous objectification
+but it just means that we need to be scrupulous in order to understand what an object is and how it is perceived 
+why it is being perceived
+and how making an observation with a particular perception would cause one to seek to understand it differently, which can evoke a process of objective speak
+exit

new/thousand_brain_questions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+The thousand brain theory might be something on the right track, as it does seem that the experience always has a visual component, and it might be that what we perceive is something which is represented more easily as a visual expression.
+1. Does the 1000 brain theory hold up for all different forms of behaviour analysis? If we were to model firing patterns?
+2. How would it correspond / correlate to the visual model which is being created/manifested in the visual cortex?
+3. Is it even possible that the visual cortex perfroms an action whereby the image that's created has nothing to do/nothing in common directly with the material/dimensional representation of the object or behaviour to which it pertains?
+- We could theorize that the conceptual field, or field of expression upon which the visual cortex operates, is utilizing a different number of dimensions, but even this would need to have / would reasonably be expected to have a quantifiable relationship to our familiar system of physical dimensions.

new/viable_movement_assessment.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+can we specify a threshold for making normal movement viable?
+what is the threshold for minimum mobility by each of the implicated structures necessary to, for example, perform a particular movement or achieve a particular position while utilizing anaerobic force with antagonizing force vectors evoking a dynamic behaviour over a quantifiable moment arm
+even if a singular isometric point upon such an arm
+how can we measure the necessary factors for achieving success 
+or produce the most efficient and accurate assessment as a means to inform the preparation a subject should undertake prior to performing an intended action
+exit