Prechádzať zdrojové kódy

Merge branch 'master' of git.logicp.ca:/logicp/logicp_writings

logicp 4 rokov pred
rodič
commit
64eb5f4fa4

+ 32 - 0
new/human_acceptance_of_unreliable_behaviour.md

@@ -34,3 +34,35 @@ so we can at least posit and produce the hypothesis that such people will be fou
 maybe I shouldn't be making my pronouncement in that way
 this likely requires greater scrutiny
 exit
+
+sometimes we see the following type up of behaviouir with those around us, such as our peers or family. You would like to have a discussion with them, but instead of being able to have an interplay that develops to a productive conversation that is meaningful and insightful to each of you, it becomes nothing more than pandering to immediate desires and emotions.
+
+Is it so that only some humans are speaking to satisfy their emotions, or is this an instrinsic part of communication between humans? Are we not to speak to one another except to satisfy an emotion - that's the extreme case
+
+A more reasonable case is that our emotions lead us towards behaviours which satisfy a biological necessity, in this case there might be a few biological necessities/needs which are being satisfied
+
+It is true, however, that:
+- behaviours are affected by emotion
+- One can be cogitnively aware of the possibility of being affected by one's emotion
+- one can attempt to reason or plan towards mitigating the possibility of being affected by one's emotion
+- that one's ability to do this is always hindered, or at least possibly affected, by the possibility of being affected by one's emotion, if even out of suspicion should it not even be possible for it to occur, this creates a paradox
+  - Given the affects of paradoxes, it leads to a complexity and that complexity has an affect, even if not fully understood ** Need to assess the paradox as it applies **
+- 
+The above list is getting to complex
+Again:
+
+- behaviours are affected by emotion
+- One can be cognitively aware of the fact that one might become affected by their emotions
+- One can attempt to mitigate this fact
+- The mitigation itself is also affected by the same possible affect
+
+So, knowing this, how is one optimally planning and targetting a goal in terms of the type and outcome of the exchange?
+
+Types of requirements that might be emotively indicated:
+- (To plan for a more prosperous future, while maintaining calm about the fact that one might have immediate needs which will easily be satisfied, and need not consume significant resources or attention.
+  - This would be an emotion which includes [calm, intentionality, clarity, optimism, ambition]
+
+Emotional redundance:
+
+here are words which might lead us to some better way of thinking, some way of speaking and perceiving, i'm not sure why we need to have an output of any kind, but simply having the output takes us through our thoughts and emotions, or even allows ut o channel emotions in an activity, because it's necessarily an intrinsic part of all human processes, sos iuch that specific symbols or glyphs or representations are being chosen, we are necesaserily making an emotionally driven choice, and doing so with the desire to drive the emotion in a particular direction
+This reminds me of exchanges where I feel like I'm being asked to satisfy a given emotiona, and I eventually become incapable of adhering to the demand, that it becomes how do you say... offensive and distasteful, that one can't fathom why they even bothered to give into it before, or were they perhaps fooled by the demand being made, and tried to give it a most charitable interpretation.