|
|
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ The standard moves of queer theory is to conflate normativity (bell curves and a
|
|
|
|
|
|
It denies the fact that there has been broad acceptance, and it doesn't JUST deny that fact, it in fact HATES the fact that there's broad acceptance, because it needs queer activists - Radical Outsiders who are willing to take up that revolutionary energy. By bringing it into the moral normative range (LGB and some T?), by allowing for marriage equality, gay marriage, etc.. This, yet again, just like how capitalism stabilized the middle class and lower class, and stole away the working class' revolutionary energy - by making broad acceptance movements succeed for gay rights and gay equality, you take away their revolutionary energy. If you have a colourblind society, you take away the revolutionary energy of racial minorities. That's why they need to fight these things. They hate marriage equality, they hate anything that, within the moral framing of normative, brings their potential proletariat revolutionary class into the fold of "broadly accepted by society". They have to keep finding outsiders. It is a reactionary and hateful movement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-A movement to keep those who are racial minorities, gender minorities, sexual minorities down. So we can tap tehir revolutionary energy, having made them feel alienated. Marxism is afraid most of the new working class, which has just gained solidarity through some coalition - might stabilize in society through capitalism and acceptance. They are afraid of this and they HATE that.
|
|
|
+A movement to keep those who are racial minorities, gender minorities, sexual minorities down. So we can tap their revolutionary energy, having made them feel alienated. Marxism is afraid most of the new working class, which has just gained solidarity through some coalition - might stabilize in society through capitalism and acceptance. They are afraid of this and they HATE that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this case, the target group are children. To make sure that children aren't growing up in a situation where acceptance is viewed as Okay. It's a sick ideology, because you have to understand Marxism is not about economics. It's not about anything in particular, identity politics, consumerism, working class (never was). It's about achieving a revolutionary that reorganizes who gets to be in charge of society with the so-called class-conscious, soviet conscious, socialist conscious Marxists in charge. It will use whatever tool it has to use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ She goes on quoting Sedgwick:
|
|
|
How do you help your kids turn out gay? Kids, students, parishioners, military, therapy, etc..
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
-She was concerned about the amoutn of interferences being made into young lives that aimed to straighten out their futures, was disturbed by large amounts of suicides, and brought the helping professions to task for their catastrophic for beliefs that queer childhood was not viable or healthy.
|
|
|
+She was concerned about the amount of interferences being made into young lives that aimed to straighten out their futures, was disturbed by large amounts of suicides, and brought the helping professions to task for their catastrophic for beliefs that queer childhood was not viable or healthy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How to bring your kids up gay Sedgewick foretold of queer studies' coming surge of the bitterness towards curative interventions into the emergence and sideways growth. She explained to her reader that the 1980 edition of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder DSM-3, the first that did not classify homosexuality as pathological fault, was erroneously celebrated as liberatory for queer subjects.
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
@@ -107,20 +107,20 @@ You can't win. They get a massive win in the gay acceptance and gay equality mov
|
|
|
Underlying Marcusian theory: this will stabilize them and make them a non-revolutionary force that will be usurped into the broader majority. Like Asians being stabilized into the Whiteness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
-Sedgewick expressed worry for teh children being fixed under this classification.
|
|
|
-Debra burtsman 2003 fondly referes to Sedgewick's loving hold on sissy boys and he-she girls when she remarks that the article is uniquely important for its submission, and that it "takes the loving reparation of the figure of the child's queer body who catches without reason the shadow of the mother's femininity or the father's masculinity - even if these were not the first shadings of gender offered to remind oen of the changes nature can take
|
|
|
+Sedgewick expressed worry for the children being fixed under this classification.
|
|
|
+Debra burtsman 2003 fondly referes to Sedgewick's loving hold on sissy boys and he-she girls when she remarks that the article is uniquely important for its submission, and that it "takes the loving reparation of the figure of the child's queer body who catches without reason the shadow of the mother's femininity or the father's masculinity - even if these were not the first shadings of gender offered to remind one of the changes nature can take
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 years later, ensuing Sedgweeks remarks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Queery Theory now includes a robust literature (LOL) that rehthinks and rehthinks and reinhabits the child with an attention to its queery character. After Sedgewick, queery theory has mapped numerous temporalities under the future of the child, assurances of a better future, appeals for avoiding of the future, and the potential for metrics of human development that allow for sideways growth, or some.
|
|
|
+Queery Theory now includes a robust literature (LOL) that rehthinks and rehthinks and reinhabits the child with an attention to its queer character. After Sedgewick, queer theory has mapped numerous temporalities under the future of the child, assurances of a better future, appeals for avoiding of the future, and the potential for metrics of human development that allow for sideways growth, or some.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-The child has become both a limit and a hope for Queer Thory. As the literature in this field has revealed, the child is a dense site of meaning for both Queery sociality, and alienate.```
|
|
|
+The child has become both a limit and a hope for Queer Theory. As the literature in this field has revealed, the child is a dense site of meaning for both Queery sociality, and alienate.```
|
|
|
|
|
|
-You have to keep the kids queer - they cannot be accepted, because they have become both the limit and the hope for Queery theory. The literature in this field has revealed the child is a dense site of meaning for both Queery Sociality and Alienation. Alienation means the ability to agitate them to become a Marxist revolutionary.
|
|
|
+You have to keep the kids queer - they cannot be accepted, because they have become both the limit and the hope for Queer theory. The literature in this field has revealed the child is a dense site of meaning for both Queery Sociality and Alienation. Alienation means the ability to agitate them to become a Marxist revolutionary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
-It is a locus of anxiey for homophobic culture because it rests on the reproduction of a heternormative future. Queery theory is now bursting with debates about the status of the child in relation to futurity. Politics and sexual subjectivity, but the field of Early Childhood Education largely resists learning from and carefully attending to these conversations.```
|
|
|
+It is a locus of anxiey for homophobic culture because it rests on the reproduction of a heternormative future. Queer theory is now bursting with debates about the status of the child in relation to futurity. Politics and sexual subjectivity, but the field of Early Childhood Education largely resists learning from and carefully attending to these conversations.```
|
|
|
|
|
|
Problematizing as a motive and as an ideological entry into the field of Early Childhood Education - you're resisting something and it's causing harm to gay people, you have to incorporate us. The same ideological entryist move over and over again. The field of early childhood education largely resists learning from and attending to queery theory. Unfairly exclusionary because the innocence of Childhood is a broad narrative preventing people from taking up queer things and sexualizing children.
|
|
|
```
|
logicp