latest draft

Book/DRAFT.md

@@ -1262,17 +1262,42 @@ We already know what the critique of those who believe in antiracism and who are
 
 #### The International Race Nation Cult 
 
-But all of that aside, they are lulling themselves into believing they have the evidence of prejudicial experience concerning a stereotype, and they are experiencing that for whatever it's worth and whatever it actually pertains to in the real universe, as some kind of event. That projection is abhorrent, and should be ridiculed and condemned for its bigotry and idiocy, and especially because it's an attempt to perpetuate misery in hopes of compelling the world into transformation, even to the point of destruction if that's the only type of transformation that could take place. The sentiment driving that desire is completely toxic, and so it should be no surprise to anyone that, given the opportunity, it would seek transformation even if it means complete and utter annihilation.
+But all of that aside, they are lulling themselves into believing they have the evidence of prejudicial experience concerning a stereotype, and they are experiencing, for whatever it's worth and whatever it actually pertains to in the real universe, as some kind of event, likely through neurotic speculation and self-reflection. That projection is abhorrent, and should be ridiculed and condemned for its bigotry (that isn't to say that they're naturally bigoted, but that they've undertaken a practice which spawns bigoted thinking and causes them to have paranoid suspicions about any who might disagree with them, given the politically polarizing purpose of the activist practices which rely on these so-called philosophies) and idiocy, and especially because it's either a deliberate attempt to perpetuate misery in hopes of compelling the world into transformation, even to the point of destruction if that's the only type of transformation that could take place or it serves in that capacity, since it indicates the appearance of man as having an unscrupulous nature. The sentiment driving that desire is completely toxic, and so it should be no surprise to anyone that, given the opportunity, it would seek transformation even if it means complete and utter annihilation.
 
-This is why obviously, in spite of them trying to prove to themselves (and succeeding, at least for themselves) that colourblindness doesn't "exist" because they keep thinking about colour, and they can't be assured that there's a totalizing force that will assuredly control every other human's experience such as to negate colour or race from the equation, let's say, we should denounce that complexly obscene behaviour and insist on colour blindness. It's actually the only alternative to an endless process of dehumanization (which would have to end with a material resolution to the differentiatedness of there being more than one being in our shared environment). Because the only possibility of justice, fairness and empathy between two beings is for them both to presuppose that the other could be a reflection of themselves, be it in the potential for experience, or understanding, or form, or what have you. There has to be a aligning in the perception of one or more of those things, and that's the key which unlocks the fairness in shared event.
+>"Interrupting the forces of racism is ongoing, lifelong work because the forces conditioning
+us into racist frameworks are always at play" - Robin DiAngelo (White Fragility)
 
-If you took those repugnant conceptual frameworks at their word, you would repeat their nonsense about having to see yourself represented, and you would forever find that even if I were to find, for example, a half Indian half Dutch man of equal dimensions, age, health, style, preference and opinion, I'd still be horrified to find that we aren't perfectly aligned and that somehow there could be some difference from which to produce an aberration from something hoped to be perfectly atoned contentment.
+They succeed tremendously well in proving to themselves that colourblindness doesn't exist, as they keep rediscovering the focus of race either through being prompted to be reminded of it explicitly from environments richly endowed with Critical Race praxis, or through their general paranoia which, in spite of whether they may have a proclivity for it, is heightened by instigating and participating in continuous struggle (a lifelong process of it, in fact), and is an undertaking for which they themselves admit to seeing no conclusive remedy, other than submission to cult collectivism and endless critique through airing of grievance, navel-gazing, wound-collecting, and other toxic, pathology-inducing behaviours. Short of a totalizing force that will assuredly control every other human's experience such as to negate colour or race from the equation, like perhaps a society-level faculty extending from a totalitarian technocracy, there will never be an end to the racism upon which their vile cult subsists. We should denounce that complexly obscene behaviour and insist on colour blindness as it's actually the only alternative to an endless process of dehumanization (which would have to end with a material resolution to the differentiatedness of there being more than one being in our shared environment).
 
-So really there is no choice, because you'll never find that truly empathetic and openly curious view of anyone else's experience without inducing it through your logically deduced conclusion that it's simply better to do so because it makes your life better.
+Perhaps I'm not coming across as clear and serious as I should be, but if we are really serious about choosing a future with principles which suppress dehumanization on dimensions such as the belief in race, racial communities, and racial nations, then we need to be explicit about what it's going to take, not just in order to criticize the world, but in order to clearly indicate what a legitimate solution would look like. The only possibility of justice, fairness and empathy between two beings is for them both to presuppose that the other could be a reflection of themselves, be it in the potential for experience, or understanding, or form, or what have you. There has to be a aligning in the perception of one or more of those things, and that's the key which unlocks the fairness in shared event.
+
+If you took those repugnant conceptual frameworks at their word, you would repeat their nonsense about having to see yourself represented, and you would forever find that even if I were to find, for example, a half Indian half Dutch man of equal dimensions, age, health, style, preference and opinion, I'd still be horrified to find that we aren't perfectly aligned and that somehow there could be some difference from which to produce an aberration from something hoped to be perfectly atoned contentment. And heaven forbid if they were to hold a political opinion or prefer a different political candidate than I, as it would surely mean that they are enraptured with a false consciousness and that I am a victim of genocide.
+
+So really there is no choice, because you'll never find that truly empathetic and openly curious view of anyone else's experience without inducing it through your logically deduced conclusion that it's simply better to do so because it makes your life better. That is to say, you don't find the people that are empathetic just on their own; you make people empathetic by improving the environment with your own intention and with your expressions which follow the upholding of principles that are morally sound and ethically robust when executed by you, who actually believes in them.
 
 ### Double Negation
+
+!TODO: This can safely be relocated, given that it doesn't necessarily follow the previous section.
+!TODO: Give intro to double negation based on my notes about biological proclivity
+
+The human mind is prone to expecting that it can adopt behaviours that are contrary, incongruent and even antithetical to its stated beliefs or values under an assumption that the behaviour will be negated at an appropriate time such as to still fulfill the outcome which corresponds with those values. Somehow, the frame of mind or consciousness of the present indicates the future outcome without having to actually of the modality which most directly produces the outcome. In fact, the expectation for the future event can be rationalized such as to allow the present behaviour which must necessarily be negated, thus behaviour may contradict the stated objective.
+
+One example of this might be knowing that we aspire to be healthy with our dietary choices, have strong opinions about what type of eating is conducive to the best performance, strong vitality and a long life, and an expectation that we will use such knowledge to practice dietary consumption in order to achieve our expected endpoint of healthy and long-lasting life.
+
+The same can be found in our mastery of other human skill sets, be it in our personal lives or in our professional faculties, as we believe we understand the methodologies and habits which will lead to our happiest way of life in pursuit of professional or personal achievements and that, in spite of this knowledge, any deviation from that is part of our preparation.
+
+This follows an intuition about making progress through a continued process of illumination. You might say that we are in perpetual preparation, be it through skilled and structured training, or even simply in waiting for the correct time to pass. With this in mind, one can either embody an expression whereby they cannot yet commence their true life, or they perceive the preparation as the true life which continuously improves the conditions of their life and reality as a whole. Reality must then be perceived either as always becoming something more, or as being false and unproven in the sense that it has not yet been brought into being.
+
+#### Enabling Thinking Conducive to Double Negation
+
+To summarize, this is the practice of believing that the current conduct, though correct in some sense, is still expected to be changed. Keep doing what you want, even if problematic, under an assumption that it will be negated at a later time, and even that it might be a form of virtue (which we expand on more when it comes to cult philosophies which utilize this).
+
+Some motivations, at least at the individual level for a given human, might be libido dominandi, a means by which to permit the play of the mind, self-loathing, puritanical thinking, and making one compatible with what one perceives as structural forces, especially if its tendrils, as currently articulated, are somehow ephemeral.
+
+#### Forms of Double Negation
+
 These constitute the forms of double negation that we are most familiar with, at the cultural level:
-- Classical Marxism: negate the process of negating the existing order
+- Classical Marxism: negate the process of negating the existing order (!TODO: Marx's ruthless criticism)
   - negate capitalist society and private property (bourgeois private property)
 - Race Marxism: negate the process of negating whiteness
 - Queer: negate the process of negating normalcy
@@ -1291,6 +1316,10 @@ In each of these, the prescription, critique, and alluded benefit are the same:
 ### Dialectical Religion
 Indeed, it is a religion because it introduces a complete means of viewing human life from which arise duties of conscience, with original sin, final judgment, a liberatory process and the transcending of man to God in order to bring about the transformation necessary to satisfy the resolution of the plight of the oppressed.
 
+"God" here doesn't have to mean a man in the sky, but the source of absolution which must not rest outside of this material construct, as a transcendental deity of the Abrahamic faiths would intimate, but an indicated direction that necessarily exists or will come to exist in this world. An divine construct brought into being either as oneself, one's integration with conditions that have been made perfect and complete, or as the understanding and perception of the world which will be made manifest.
+
+It functions as a dialogue which includes oneself but necessarily requires the rest of the existing world as a component for, in most cases, one's victimization through the conditions of the world and the others who are party to it requires a correction not of the self, who is not accountable simply because they exist as the product of the surroundings, thus any observed error, shortcoming or revealing of one's lack of grace is simply an indication that one has been prevented embodying their true essence due to the surroundings, which must be transformed.
+
 It is dialectical because it functions by continuously adopting new understanding of previously known concepts and reifying the new understanding until they cannot be thought of in any other way. Everything is redefined to indicate a collective consciousness that will bring about transformation through knowledge otherwise not available, except through the proletarian identity. The change in history is so powerful that it promises to make the impossible and unimaginable real.
 
 The drive towards eliminating the factors which prevent humans from beginning their true existence comes through a sense that the human being, and humanity, will come to be completed, and that this sense of completion would only be arrived at once we no longer fear a threat of succumbing to the limitations of human existence.
@@ -1298,41 +1327,51 @@ The drive towards eliminating the factors which prevent humans from beginning th
 Obviously, such a thing cannot be attained, and we are essentially programming the rest of the populace into seeing the issue in those terms. The refinement of the populace into something which makes no sense except in theory.
 
 #### Completing Man
+
 The vision of the completed human being is one formulated and delivered by the state. A man who sits in perfect harmony within the collective and who, because of this, enjoys his most perfect personal life as well. If all resources are perfectly directed towards an objective as identified by the state, then no objective becomes too difficult nor too absurd to promise to the citizens.
 
+Some might wish to say that there is no state in the final permutation of world and society, or that one is critical of the state, but all collectivist cult affiliation necessarily requires that it itself functions as the state, or that the state must adopt the goals and even language of the cult such that it can be leveraged, but that the state must be a stepping stone in the right direction.
+
 If the state authority exists at the scale of the globe, rather than a single nation with an independent area of land and water, then their duties become so supreme and superordinate that the criticism of any one single human cannot carry the weight necessary to unseat them. No locale of opinion, with all of its idiosyncrasies, noisy paradigms, ugly biases and embarrassing history polluting it, is able to choose, raise up, or dismiss and deny the authority which is situated to have ultimate oversight and acuity over the entirety of human affairs and human existence.
 
+##### Impossible Objectives
+
+I wish to highlight again that there's no limit as to the absurdity of future promises to be made by the intelligentsia on behalf of a conceptual collective so long as it is mediated through the state by virtue of a social contract. The high falutin betters are not in the business of actually realizing anything whatsoever at the level of concrete edification; the elite-minded moral busy-bodies are able to convince themselves they've realized everything at the level of idealism through making commitments, especially on behalf of those who might have a difference of mind.
+
 ## The Description
-Communism is, according to Marx, the state of human life where the following is true:
-- human beings engage in activity which is volitional;
-- which is not influenced by any desire or need;
-- and especially not a need associated with survival;
-- and all aspects of society are fulfilled by this as free activity;
-- there is no state
-
-The communist advocates for this endpoint, and they perceive Communism as:
-- a God object
-- a perfectly spontaneous ordering of life
-- a return home
-- entering the garden of Eden
-- having one's fill from the tree of knowledge
+
+Communism is, according to Marx, the state of human life follows axiomatically from the following evident truths:
+- Human beings engage in activity which is volitional;
+- Which is not influenced by any desire or need;
+- And especially not a need associated with survival;
+- And all aspects of society are fulfilled by this as free activity;
+- There is no state
+
+The Communist advocates for this endpoint, and they perceive Communism as:
+- A God object
+- A perfectly spontaneous ordering of life
+- A return home
+- Entering the Garden of Eden
+- Having one's fill from the tree of knowledge
 
 ## The Statement
-Marx's statement is the following:
-> "Communism as the positive transcendence of private property as human self-estrangement."
+
+Marx's most revealing statement is the following:
+> "Communism as the positive transcendence of private property as human self-estrangement." - Karl Marx (Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 - Private Property and Communism)
 
 How does one normally perceive such a statement? Isn't it communism getting rid of private, for-profit mega-corporations (which otherwise enjoy ridiculous monopolies at everyone else's expense) and replacing them with state-certified production of whatever people need in appropriate quantities and with standards which solve planned obsolescence, and any other worry consumers might have currently.
 
 Well, no, there is no state in Marx's formulation of communism.
 
-> "For the state to wither away, complete communism is necessary."
+> "For the state to wither away completely, complete communism is necessary." - Vladimir Lenin (The State and Revolution - The Economic Basis of the Withering Away of the State)
 
 ### Pragmatic Communism?
-*Indeed, on the Marxists.org website, they speak of the nature of truth and actually position communism as being close to pragmatism (except with everything's utility measured insofar as it propagates communism and installs communists in power. But here, however, we're talking about the perspective of a pragmatic communist who claims that incomplete communism is still communism.*
 
-"Well, it's all the same: the incomplete societies are still doing communism as is first feasible, with room for change as time passes. They are still the societies that are communistic by comparison."
+*Indeed, on the Marxists.org website, they speak of the nature of truth and actually position Communism as being close to pragmatism (except with everything's utility measured insofar as it propagates Socialism and installs Communists in power. But here, however, we're talking about the perspective of a pragmatic Communist who claims that incomplete Communism (which is also Socialism) is still Communism.*
 
-I'm not even necessarily denying that, but the point was that it will never satisfy the capacity for a central authority to assert or make claim to ever-greater power. The logic of the system of thinking is that private exchange of use of goods as a financial transaction, and the necessity for having such activity, estrange man - the worker, the owner, and the consumer - and that this perpetuates and becomes even more insidious with each subsequent generation which must adopt the corresponding practices (almost as a set of ritualistic practices as part of an ideology (according to Marxism)) in order to survive in the system such as it is (or even to enjoy certain benefits in an incomplete communistic society).
+Some will retort: "Well, it's all the same: the incomplete societies are still doing communism as is first feasible, with room for change as time passes. They are still the societies that are communistic by comparison."
+
+I'm not even necessarily denying that, but the point was that it will never satisfy the capacity for a central authority to assert for or make claim to ever-greater power. The logic of the system of thinking is that private exchange of use of goods as a financial transaction, and the necessity for having such activity, estrange man - the worker, the owner, and the consumer - and that this perpetuates and becomes even more insidious with each subsequent generation which must adopt the corresponding practices (almost as a set of ritualistic practices as part of an ideology (according to Marxism)) in order to survive in the system such as it is (or even to enjoy certain benefits in an incomplete communistic society).
 
 Continuing down a path and calling it communism while knowingly contradicting its principles may sound like a death blow to a communist revolutionary's thinking, but it is quite the opposite. Whenever a communist feels they must do something contradictory in order to operate to their benefit (even insofar as being able to fulfill their stated obligation - such as perpetuating communism or socialist), it becomes several things for the communist all at once:
 - evidence that they are right (look what we are forced to do)
@@ -1599,6 +1638,9 @@ Some may raise some objections to the notion that Queer is at the heart of the n
 - these all feed into Communism - we should focus attention there
 
 #### Muh Feminism
+
+!TODO: Put Feminism article here
+
 In a way, this is the correct response, except you are trying too hard to separate them. We see them as different because so many men participate in the newer formulation, but you can already see where I'm going with all this: it is simply the evolution of the idea as it becomes updated to remain viable and operationally significant. As far as it has been ???, what do you think is meant by that?
 
 Some might say that, prior to the most pronounced proliferation of Queer Theory, the phenomenon of people explicitly distancing themselves from or even outright denouncing feminism had become more unstable. That although it is reasonable to assume that feminist rhetoric had, at some time ago, been extremely unpopular and that it has become familiar to declare or hear or hear the declaration that the insistent voice of a woman demanding equal treatment be something that we must prioritize the receival of, because they are completing against the odds. But (the fact of that being so familiar sentiment also speaks to the degree to which it has become the common, sensible, and popular view to have such an outlook on the matter).