updated

Historicism.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # Historicism
 
 ## Historicist Philosophies
-The historicist philosophies follow the fact of time's singular dimension, the continued anticipability of that which has not yet or may never yet come to pass. The inability of the mind to conclusively confirm whether something that occurred could have come to be of a different path of preceding events, and so on.
+The historicist philosophies follow the fact of time's singular dimension, the continued anticipatability of that which has not yet or may never yet come to pass. The inability of the mind to conclusively confirm whether something that occurred could have come to be of a different path of preceding events, and so on.
 
 ## Double Negation
 The double negation is another fascinating concept which reinforces the propensities of human thinking already inherent in the human form. The mind which reflects on the reality that there is currently a state, that this state can be changed, and that this change can be sooner if made to change through deliberate intent, or that the mind does not welcome the change and sees the best outcome, in the immediate, as one where the human mind does not yet have to consider that anything must be different; if things should be different then they shall come to be without the mind having to admit error.

collectivist_theology/# The Ally.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# The Ally
+Back in the day people who couldn't figure out your race would inquire and, in doing so, show off their racism. Then when they'd find out, they'd turn the racism up and express it towards the race revealed.
+
+That type of personality. Those types of people.
+
+That's today's "ally".

collectivist_theology/Freire_Transform_Objective.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# Freirean Transformation of Objective Reality
+
+I find it stunning to read Freire talking about how theirs is an effort to transform objective reality, particularly because those who aim for collectivist liberation from systemic oppression will always refute demands for objective reasoning on the basis of Kant's subject/object split. But they, the cake-eaters that they are, get to eat that cake too - they are historicist!
+
+Historicist, not in the sense of being of a mature society that recognizes how its knowledge and capability depends on that of years past, but in the sense that the process of history is reasonable. This is easy to accept unconsciously, because there is no other path of history to intuit except one which follows a path of perceiving the world for a period of time, as one does.
+
+But consciously, the idea is Hegel's (someone Freire quotes, of course), where the actual structure of reality is made up of ideas aka spirit, with reason meaning the true knowledge of concrete reality and the logical nature of reality. The fact of its natural laws, and beauty and elegance can be taken forward to include history itself unfolding. Now we have an understanding that history is itself reason, and knowledge of its unfolding includes an expectation that if that process were ever to complete it would be through a completely self conscious mind which is the entirety of reality.
+
+And so the transformation of reality is something you get for free, in a sense, since time moves and that's the only requirement for one to observe and say that there is a history of the world. You get the ability to play this game where no one has objective truth or knowledge, but any belief that the act of your existence can cause even the slightest perturbation in one of your ass hairs is enough for you to have transformed objective reality. You are always transforming objective reality and that means you have reason.
+
+Now you can carry this over to your desires, and imagine that any event which occurs which might affect the trajectory towards that desired endpoint can be seen as "Reasonable" (like blocking traffic for Trans Zionist or Trans Palestinian Lives Matter).
+
+Feuerbach and Marx take this historical process of reason unfolding as ideas into an absolute idea and they say that any notion that man's existence must be in consideration of an object foreign to man himself necessarily produces the alienation of man, and that, therefore, historical process is the history of man creating himself until such time that he is man in himself. Put another way, it wouldn't make sense that the reason of history would be such that it leads to perpetual alienation of man. There is no history being witnessed by anything but man; the conditions of the world cause the alienation of man and the inability for him to pursue his life and existence in the way that he truly, through his reason, would be able to fashion freely absent the influence of his oppression.
+
+So if the absolute were unfolding to perfection, and man is part of that existence, then even his ideas would have to eventually unfold to perfection, but a world where man is increasingly alienated would have to be an unreasonable one.
+
+Now you have that the transformation is reality takes place, through praxis, through your action as subject, even if it's completely absent any possibility of empirical verification, that it is advancing history towards an imminent endpoint, and that this describes the telos of reality (which exists for man) regardless of whether you believe in spirits or God or just that everything which exists is matter in motion.

collectivist_theology/Hegel_OS.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Requires Praxis
 Praxis is what you have when you combine theory, Hegelian Reason as we're going to see, critical theory, postmodern theory, woke theory, Theory
-Put into practicecombined with being put into rpactice
+Put into practice combined with being put into rpactice
 activism on behalf of theoretical or ideological model
 
 negative thinking and do activism on behlaf of it. ngeative thinking becomes positive, because it prevents us from going into calamities that are contained within a seed of the future that can possibly be blossomed

collectivist_theology/James_car-metaphor.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Car Metaphor
+## Model
+Car {
+  Engine { int power }
+  DriveTrain { int current }
+  Transmission { }
+  Wheels { bool turning }
+}
+
+- Engine produces power
+- Drive train directs power to wheels
+- Tires make contact
+
+## Engine
+- UN, WHO, CFR
+- Global NGOs
+- Commitments, Agreements, Resolutions, Mandates
+
+## Drivetrain
+- Institutions
+- States and administrative departments
+- Universities, Corporations, Non-profits, Political Parties
+
+## Wheels
+- Functionaries
+- Activists outside institutions (often subsidized)
+- "Do the work"
+- Corporate strivers (status + bonuses)
+
+## Commentary
+- Wheels spin according to power (follow orders)
+- Cultists and the "Current Thing" activate through mass lines
+
+## WEF
+- Social club for big players
+- Ultra elite
+- Must conform one's interests
+
+### Process
+- Generate alignment for collaboration (primary)
+- Make commitments (secondary)
+
+### Agenda
+- Influence through the forum to get large actors working in concert
+- Pursue moderately corrupt interests
+
+## Transmission
+- WEF works like the transmission
+- Penetrating cabinets (transfering power to the drivetrain)
+- Makes use of the power (the UN Agenda)
+
+## Ending the WEF
+- Make it toxic to participate in
+- Career ending association
+
+## Other Car Damage
+- Cut the fuel line: US withdraws from UN
+
+## Who Drives it?
+Such things are formed through incentive structure, so it's likely that those with the greatest assets have influence. (Large landowners?)

collectivist_theology/Master-Slave-Dialectic.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# Understanding the Master-Slave Dialectic of Hegel
+
+## Context
+- From Phenomenology
+- Explains how self-consciousness dialectically sublates into: {Absolute Knowledge, Spirit and Science}
+- a priori to understanding the Science of Logic
+
+## Sublate/Sublation
+From the German "Aufheben".
+- To take up, lift up and carry.
+- To higher level where its abstraction can be utilized.
+It is sometimes translated to mean negate or take away, but there are two ways in which to examine this. See following section.
+
+## Sublate Negation
+As you take up an idea or concept, you'll be able to understand some aspect of it, which could be considered an abstraction of it, and this can be synthesized into some other action or observation. You may have negated some aspect of the original concept, and reduced it into a partial component, or even transformed the aspect of it into some new conception from which an abstraction can be more easily deduced, internalized, harnessed, and so forth.
+
+In the other sense, to lift or take incurs the negation of having moved some object from its original place, but in doing so you are also engaging with that object, or carrying it across spacetime for a later point, preserving its potential for incorporation with that future event.
+
+## Recognition
+Absolute knowledge can only be attained after self-conscious recognition of another instance of self-consciousness.
+Believes that the entirety of reality is present to self-consciousness, and that this state is reached in 3 steps:
+1. Desire (directing outwards from self)
+2. Master-slave (directed to an unequal other)
+3. Universal self-consciousness (self consciousness recognizing self in another)
+
+## Myth
+- Story of people meeting
+- Self consciousness developed from consciousness
+- Sublation into absolute knowledge, not through natural science, but through phenomenology as per a progression through history wherein a struggle for freedom leads to realization of self
+- Hegel's language makes for multiple interpretations:
+- a) self consciousness through human development
+- b) self consciousness of a society in history becoming a nation realizing freedom
+
+## Master-Slave
+Dual interpretation: The dialectic interpreted as an internal process occurring in one person OR as an external process between two people.
+
+This occurs because Hegel asserts "end to the antithesis of subject and object" - What occurs in the mind also occurs outside
+Objective and Subjective unified through sublation.
+
+Two natural beings meet and find self consciousness in one another's independent existence. They are aware of one another's pre-reflective, exclusionary disposition which prioritizes itself.
+
+Each being perceives itself as truly self-conscious through certainty of oneself as a thinking being. This constitutes an incomplete self-consciousness, failing to see the other as equivalent.
+
+Interplay of manipulating the other, whereby they see themselves reflected in the other. This yields a form of narcissism.
+
+The self loses itself when finding itself as the other, which is also sublation in the sense of having reduced the representation of the other to its own self.
+
+### Reaction
+When confronted with the other, the self cannot be immediately recognized. The other is like an ordinary object.
+
+### Death struggle
+The fight, nearly to the death.
+If one dies, self consciousness is not achieved. This is an "abstract negation".
+Death is avoided by agreement and subordination to slavery.
+
+One transformed into master as they do not perceive their identity as dependent on life, thus eliminating fear.
+The other is transformed into slave out of fear.
+
+### Enslavement
+Recognition of the other gives each self-certainty required for self-consciousness. Relation of master/slave preserves the recognition of each other. In recognizing the other, one's own consciousness is made into an unessential object, but realization of this object constitutes certainty of self
+
+### Contradiction/Resolution
+This state is not sufficient to achieve full self-consciousness. Slave only recognizes pain of death. Master's self-consciousness is dependent on the slave for recognition.
+
+Slave creates increasingly sophisticated products for master from nature due to creativity, and sees himself reflected in the products, thus causing him to realize that the world is created by his hands. The slave is no longer alienated from his own labour and achieves self-consciousness, while the master becomes dependent on the products created by the slave, resulting in his becoming a slave.

collectivist_theology/prison_of_body.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 *Judith Butler and many Queer foundational texts mention Foucault repeatedly for having said something.*
 - We normally hear of how the Body is the Prison with the implicit understanding that the Soul is the real you and that you can't be fully aware of it or it cannot be free because your experience is bound to the constraint of a material body.
 But what Foucault actually said was this:
-**"The Soul is the prison of the body".
+**"The Soul is the prison of the body".**
 
 ## Hegel and What This Means
 ### Hegel

covidism/DenisRancourt - Bioweapon.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+# Is It a Bioweapon?
+`Adverse effects we're seeing are absolutely horrendous and then there's the research you're doing on all-cause mortality. What are your thoughts on the subject of whether these vaccines are bioweapons?`
+
+This is a political question and it asks for a political answer. I don't mean that my opinion will be pressured by politics - I mean that this is a political question.
+
+I personally, with my experience and my looking at this phenomenon and my understanding of geopolitics and so on - I do not believe that the injections themselves are a bioweapon. My position is that it's the ability to vaccinate the entire population - roll out vaccines how you want and when you want - that is the military application, here. The military wants to be able to inject things into your arm whatever they want when they want and they are perfecting a way to convince you to - they are perfecting the mechanism whereby they can inject everyone when they want.
+
+I think that is an important military objective - something useful to the military - it's useful because you can decide to make certain populations weaker where there's more trouble. You can also inject an antidote if you believe someone else has a bioweapon that they're putting out - you can put out an antidote to your own population and so on. The military wanted to do this, and it's clear that it's a military operation - and I think that it's the campaign that is military - but the injection, I don't see any evidence that it could be a bioweapon.
+
+They have this idea, this project, with the lipid nanoparticles and a technology for putting things into your body, and so on, but it would be very easy to kill people if they wanted to and they wouldn't have to do it in such a round-about and - I'm sure they have the technology to make a lot of people die from cancer, for example, and you would never know - you wouldn't even have to be talking about vaccines or anything.
+
+I don't believe that the vaccines themselves are a bio-weapon and even the rates of fatality that I am calculating are not that great. I mean, it's horrendous when you're thinking about a medical treatment. But in absolute numbers, 0.2% of the world population has been killed up to now from the vaccines. Most of those people were elderly - a great majorty - because it's exponential by age - which means that you did not harm anyone's economy, their ability to fight, their ability to develop engineers or anything like that.
+
+You have killed vulnerable, elderly people - 0.2% of the world population. So, I don't think it's a bioweapon.
+
+They could choose to inject a bioweapon if they wanted to, and the other thing is that you don't inject a toxic substance that is non-discriminant into your own population and into everybody.
+
+I still believe that geopolitics is real and that the nations are the fundamental blocks and, even though there are elites that are crazy and want all kinds of things and feel threatened by large population and they might fantasize about depopulation, but I just don't think it's a bioweapon. That's my own opinion at this stage, and I'm open to having my mind changed, but right now I don't see evidence that it could be a bioweapon itself.
+

covidism/Geert_updated_warning.md

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+## Part 1
+COVID-19 vaccination does not promote herd immunity. This is because mRNA vaccines and vaccine-breakthrough infections promoted resistance of new omicron variants to previously omicron-induced antibodies and therefore prevented the development of herd immunity.
+
+Highly covid-19 vaccinated populations exert herd immune pressure n viral infectiousness instead of generating herd immunity against productive infection. Mass vaccination programs imposed by health authorities and policy-makers have turned highly covid-19 vaccinated populations into a breeding ground or immune escape variants and have thereby transformed natural pandemic into a pandemic of immune escape variants.
+
+Pretending that a pandemic of immune escape variants generates herd immunity is a contradiction in terms. In other words, a pandemic of immune escape variants cannot generate herd immunity and without herd immunity a pandemic cannot transition into endemicity.
+
+Mass-vaccination during a natural pandemic fails to provide durable sterilizing immunity to the individual. That is why mass vaccination ails to generate herd immunity while driving large-scale immune escape.
+
+## Part 2
+In the case of a pandemic, natural immunity, including trained innate immunity, is far more efficient and safe than vaccine-induced immunity. Current protection of vaccinees against severe disease is fragile and not durable. The best way to protect against severe COVID-19 disease, during an immnune escape pandemic, is therefore not vaccine-induced immunity, but trained innate immunity. Whereas, both cell-based innate immunity, and virulence inhibiting non-neutralizing antibodies, are variant non-specific, the cell-based immune system is endowed with immunological memory, whereas non-neutralizing antibodies are not. Due to their thoroughly trained

covidism/mask_opportunity_consciousness.md

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+The mask brings an opportunity to hide vulnerabilities innate to our physical form. That we are accountable to the actions of the body is an intrinsic consequence of the ability for one to be identified. Repeating the ritual of suppressing that ability also ambiguates one's experience, conception of self, and conception of reality as a whole.
+
+As the human face is an interface through which it's plausible that the densest data can be exchanged, as not only does it rapidly provide a path to large sets of metadata, but it also provides a dynamic and continuous stream of output containing potent indicators of emotive and physiological state heavily impacting the context of environment and probabilities of an ever-changing set of outcomes.
+
+As we alter the standard of social interaction by means which constrain the use of our most significant and stimulating junction, we facilitate focus on increasingly detached and arbitrary endpoints. This means a reality where humans are less able to recognize one another's unique form, state of being, and viability in this world, and one where we are more readily invited to indulge in directing our minds to matters of import to one's ego.
+
+Oh, the irony of bringing about an industrial revolution, in the name of altruism and humanity, whose effect is to isolate us in chambers of vanity so easily believed to be virtue.

crt/CRT_Quotes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+# Alison Bailey
+*Bailey, Alison. “Tracking Privilege-Preserving Epistemic Pushback in Feminist and Critical Race Philosophy Classes,” Hypatia*
+
+"The Critical Thinking tradition is concerned primarily with epistemic adequacy. To be critical is to show good judgment and recognizing when arguments are faulty. Assertions like evidence, truth claims, appeal to unreliable sources, or concepts are sloppily crafted and applied. For critical thinkers, the problem is that people fail to examine the assumptions, commitments and logic of daily life. The basic problem is irrational, illogical and unexamined living."
+
+"Critical pedagogy begins from a different set of assumptions, rooted in the Neo-Marxian literature on Critical Theory commonly associated with the Frankfurt School."
+
+# Audrey Lords
+"The tools of the critical thinking tradition, for example, validity, soundness, conceptual clarity, cannot dismantle the master's house, they can temporarily beat the master at his own game, but they can never bring about any enduring structural change"
+
+# Richard Delgado / Jean Stefancic
+"Crits [Critical Race Theorists] are highly suspicious of another liberal mainstay, namely rights." -Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, first edition, p. 23.
+
+“Unlike traditional civil rights, which embraces incrementalism and step-by-step progress, critical race theory questions the very foundations of the liberal order, including equality theory, legal reasoning, Enlightenment rationalism, and neutral principles of constitutional law.” From Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, by Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, first edition, p. 3.
+
+"Political scientists ponder voting strategies coined by critical race theorists. Ethnic studies courses often include a unit on critical race theory, and American studies departments teach material on critical white studies developed by CRT writers. Unlike some academic disciplines, critical race theory contains an activist dimension. It not only tries to understand our social situation, but to change it" From Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, by Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, first edition, p. 3.
+
+# Robin DiAngelo
+(Critical Whiteness Studies)
+"This work merges in the North American context of the 1960s with antiwar, feminist, gay rights, Black power, Indigenous peoples, The Chicano Movement, disability rights, and other movements for social justice.
+
+Many of these movements initially advocated for a type of liberal humanism (individualism, freedom, and peace) but quickly turned to a rejection of liberal humanism. The logic of individual autonomy that underlies liberal humanism (the idea that people are free to make independent rational decisions that determine their own fate) was viewed as a mechanism for keeping the marginalized in their place by obscuring larger structural systems of inequality. In other words, it fooled people into believing that they had more freedom and choice than societal structures actually allow."
+- Robin DiAngelo - Is Everyone Really Equal An Introduction to Key Concepts in Social Justice Education, p. 47

queer/GroomerSchools_5.md

@@ -0,0 +1,382 @@
+# Groomer Schools 5
+## Alice Bailey
+The exoteric form of eugenics is crude, but the esoteric form of eugenics is the science of right human relations.
+
+Making sure that we are preparing people to be the vessels of souls.
+
+
+## Balvatsky
+Inspired Hitler:
+- swastika, race ideology
+
+## IPPF & UNESCO
+International Planned Parenthood Federation, UN and UNESCO are rooted in some of these
+Taking the lead on comprehensive sexual education over the past 20 years
+The US and across the world
+
+## Information Handout
+On Comprehensive Sexual Education
+Youth Friendly services
+Gender issues and sexual rights
+
+We will read the first 3 pages to see what SESE
+
+`A right's based approach to comprehensive sexuality education CSE seeks to equip people with the knowledge, skills, attitudes and values they need to determine and enjoy their sexuality physically and emotionally, individually and in relationships`
+
+Reminder: This is talking about education children
+
+`It views sexuality holistically as part of Young people's emotional and social development.`
+
+Holistic is a watch word because the part and the whole are the intrinsic opposites that Hegelianism works with. Holistic means Hermetic and Marxist derives the same concepts of holism through Hegel's application of it.
+
+## holistic Sexuality
+You can't understand Sexuality separate from anything else. It's not that there are aspects that could be considered separately, nor is it that sexuality can be separate from life. It's not a part, it's an intrinsic part of a much broader whole.
+
+`It recognizes that information alone is not enough. Young people need to be given the opportunity to acquire essential life skills and develop positive attitudes and values.`
+
+This is a technique being used. A bland and vague statement that's difficult to disagree with.
+
+#### Motte and Bailey strategy
+This is setting up the motte. So now any challenge to their suggestions will be met with "are you against young people having essential life skills? Or is it that values that you don't want them to have?"
+
+Reactionary movement from the right also does this: putting out statements that are difficult to agree with.
+
+If we back up a sentence here, though, we remember that we're talking about holistic sexuality education as a part of children's social and emotional development. So when they say acquire life skills they mean about sex. Develop positive attitudes about sex. Values according to someone's values about sex.
+
+So when you say this is perverse, they will challenge you with this bland statement which doesn't say that the comprehensive sexuality education is teaching children very specific and peculiar about sex and sexuality so that they can do certain things with their emotional and physical social health. It seeks to equip young people with the knowledge skills attitudes and values they need to determine and enjoy their sexuality.
+
+Statements that are difficult to disagree with in the abstract that have very serious meanings in the concrete. Hegel's dialectic is always moving from the abstract through to the concrete. Never forget that their language is designed to put you to sleep because then you either won't pay attention or you will get bored and lost and fall asleep in the middle losing mental focus necessary to string together that the punchline to the paragraph is not comprehensible without understanding the paragraph before it and much of the context that will follow. It's intentionally vague.
+
+`Comprehensive sexuality education covers a broad range of issues relating to the physical biological and emotional aspects of sexuality`. So nothing, it touches on virtually everything.
+
+`This approach recognizes and accepts all people as sexual beings and is concerned with more than just the prevention of disease or pregnancy.`
+
+Okay, but toddlers are people, and they've already spoken of Young People.
+
+This is not just about medical sex education. This is not about the prevention of disease and pregnancy. It's concerned with more than that, because they are sexual beings.
+
+`Comprehensive sexual education programs should be adapted to the age and stage of development of the target group`.
+
+That's a disclaimer, because if you recall: the second episode of groomer schools 2 covered the idea that they are trying to apply Queer Theory to developmental psychology so they can Queer those stages (they are explicit in this). Sexual agency might be absolutely age-appropriate and developmentally appropriate for 5 year olds. They are putting a disclaimer to put you at ease to assume they'll do everything in a responsible manner.
+
+reminder: Queer Theory only works to violate norms. They will not respect norms you expect in a responsible manner.
+
+"Adapter to the age and stage of the target group". Meanwhile their colleagues are working to transform the age and stage of development of target groups standards so they can groom kids in schools.
+
+```(age and stage appropriate)
+CSE must help people to:
+1. Acquire accurate information on reproductive rights
+2. Information to disspell myths
+3. References to resources and services
+```
+
+So your first response should be that there is a need to unpack these in the context. The first priority is to acquire information on rights (this is not related to medical, safety or prevention of pregnancy).
+
+They don't say they will give you references to UNESCO and Planned Parenthood propaganda or pornography. Services: planned parenthood working its way through the schools through partnerships with UNESCO, and also Trevor Project which helps make sure that children can get their questions about transition answered through their suicide-prevention hotline. But parents posing as 12 year olds have been able to get these people talking about cross-sex hormones, puberty blockers and social transition in a matter of minutes with no effort. The groomer project was listed as an innovative platform by the World Economic Forum (with regard to educational technology services that impinge on inclusive behaviours).
+
+So, all of the usual players are tied up in a funny knot over this.
+
+`Secondly: develop life skills including Critical Thinking`. We did a whole podcast on this. When they say "Critical Thinking" they mean "Critical Theory". They have an entire paper devoted to this. We read a crucial set of paragraphs in a New Discourses bullet on the difference between Critical Thinking and Critical Theory, because when they say these things that are tricking you.
+
+The woke are actually openly against Critical Thinking, which they quite hate. They say it allows people to defend their epistemic home-turf (it allows you to argue back against their stuff and reassert power dynamics). They say that critical thinking is brewed up out of the western tradition, reinforcing western hegemony, and that it is actually used to cast aspersions on marginalized groups like racial and sexual minorities. Critical Theory, on the other hand, always calls into question power dynamics and does all of its analysis through power dynamics.
+
+The Generative Themes seen in the Drag Queen Story Hour paper, which derives from Paulo Freire allows for the teacher to be presented as a facilitator in presenting the Critical Interpretation (Marxist interpretation) of whatever happens to be in front of the kids. "Develop life-skills including critical thinking, is a  huge red flag).
+
+Sense of self, confidence, assertiveness, ability to take responsibility, ability to ask questions and seek help and empathy. (Empathy is their grand excuse for everything they do - weaponizing it - don't you want kids to care more empathetic and to care more)?
+
+No, actually know, after watching the self-esteem movement for 40 years, I want kids to care a lot less and to care more about succeeding and achievement and growing up healthy and happy and a lot less about everyone's damn feelings. Maybe a bit less poisoned empathy would be a good thing. Empathy is their magic word - like in climate change the magic word is emissions that makes have to pay attention and do what they say. Well, empathy is the magic word here.
+
+## Demystifying toolkit on Comprehensive Sexuality
+- By Guttemacher foundation (some conjunction with the International Planned Parenthood foundation)
+`Nurture positive attitudes and values, including open mindedness, respect for self and others, Positive self-worth and esteem, comfort, non-judgmental attitude, sense of responsibility and positive attitude towards their sexual and reproductive health. .`
+
+As defined by who? The sex-positive queer theorists, of course. We're teaching kids to be open minded about sex - does that mean being open to having sex with weirdos? Maybe we should be more closed minded there too.
+
+"Oh you want your kids to be closed minded bigots". Well if that includes pedophiles, then yes. How do you feel about that?
+
+Respect for others = accepting any command in the name of inclusivity (which is about censoring and sanitizing a space).
+
+Non-judgmental attitude? How about with kink? They'll likely introduce some.
+
+- Teach children to have positive attitude towards their sexual health
+  - They are children - they do not have sexual health
+  - Opportunity to suggest instantiating a sexual health component in their lives.
+  - Assumes a sexual health was close to being woken, or perhaps it's to awaken that part of their lives
+  - Age and developmentally-appropriate according to the way that Queer Theory has queered age and developmentally-appropriateness
+
+## IPPF Framework for CSE (Comprehensive Sexuality Education)
+*From Choice: A World of Possibilities*
+7 Essential components of SE
+
+`This document reflects current IPPF on the different important elements of CSE identified as the following:`
+- Gender
+- Sexual and Reproductive Health and HIV
+- Sexual Rights and Sexual Citizenship
+- Pleasure
+- Violence
+- Diversity
+- Relationships
+
+### The Rights of Young People
+Drawn from the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child II
+"Children and young people have the right to enjoy the highest attainable health access to health facilities and access to information that will allow them to make decisions about their health including family planning. Young people already have the right to be heard, express opinions and be involved in decision-making. They have the right to education that will help them learn, develop and reach their potential and prepare them to be understanding and tolerant toward others. Additionally, young people have the right not to be discriminated against."
+
+They have the right to education that will help them learn, develop and reach their full potential (sexually). Extraordinarily open-ended in terms of what it could mean.
+
+```
+IPPF is committed to the provision and promotion of youth-friendly services which are easily available to all young people irrespective of their age, sex, marital status or financial situation.
+
+IPPF recognizes the right of all young people to enjoy sex and express their sexuality in the way that they choose.
+
+Information should be accessible to children and young people of all ages in accordance with their evolving capacities whether sexually active or not and irrespective of sexual orientation, young people should be given the information to enable them to feel comfortable and confident about their bodies and their sexuality.
+
+Comprehensive Sexuality that helps young people acquire the skills to negotiate relationships in safe or sexual practices including whether and when to engage in sexual intercourse should be available.
+
+Broad-based strategies are needed to address young people both in and out of school. Special attention should be made paid to the most disadvantaged young people.
+
+```
+
+## Useful Resources
+- The sex education forum in the UK
+- SIECUS: well known communist front organization - Sexuality Information and Education Council in the United States
+- Advocates for Youth
+- Planned Parenthood
+- Population Council: international non-profit ngo that conducts biomedical social science and public health research
+- Guttemacher Institute: Non-profit focused on sexual and reproductive health research, policy analysis and public education. Publishes perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, international family planning perspectives, topics pertaining to sexual and reproductive health rights
+- UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund)
+- Action Health Incorporated
+- World Association for Sexual Health (worldsexology.org)
+- GenderHealth.org
+
+Curriculum resources for peer educators include the guide to implementing teens for Aids prevention. The IPPF peer education handbook on sexual and reproductive health and rights. Peer education training of trainers, Youth Peer Education Network: European Guidelines for Aids peer education. Curriculum resources for teachers, etc it goes on and on and on
+
+Planned parenthood and Unesco are throughout this. This is the who's who of the problem.
+
+### 1. Gender
+One of their favourite focuses is to look at things not within society, but within the family. facilitators and operatives in these CSE programs will be set up as the good guys while the parents will be setup as the bad guys for not understanding the `up-to-date science`
+Gender doesn't exist. There is sex. We have sex. We are male or female. If we are male, we have a number of primary sex characteristics that have to do with our gametes - the sex-cells we produce have to do with our sexual reproductive organs, and females have others. Primary sex characteristics - the reproductive systems that you have. Sometimes there are biological anomalies, but there's either one or the other. There is no in-between, part way, or otherwise. These are what are observed at birth (you are not assigned a sex at birth).
+
+A small % of sex anomalies do occur, as a form of birth defect - occassionally that observation is misleading, and this becomes the ground that biological sex is a social construction.
+
+Before puberty, you are a child with a male or female body with reproductive organs that are undeveloped. At puberty they begin to differentiate through the development of secondary sex characteristics - development of breast, body hair, growth and descension of the testes, growth of the penis, broadening of the jaw, deepening of the voice, building out of adult-male frame (surging levels of testosterone), the development of the female body to be of reproductive capacity.
+
+Primary sex characteristics are fully binary.
+Secondary sex characteristics have a distribution in terms of how they grow. Penises grow to different sizes, voices drop to different degrees, etc. Some men can look very effeminate, and some women can look very masculine in certain regards.
+
+Some overlap in external appearances but this doesn't negate the fact that your sex is still your sex and that though your secondary sex characterics are distributed a little more broadly, they are still observable.
+
+What gets called "Gender" is best described as tertiary sex characterics. Even more subtle features with even more varied distributions. Psychological traits. Distribution among occupation, etc. Whether these correlate as one would typically expect or not doesn't negate anything about sex or complicate it. It's not a mystical thing called gender, it's just a more varied distribution of how the traits can present without there being an anomaly present. That doesn't make gender real, it's just a derivative of sex overwhelmingly with cultural aspects worked in, but it's nowhere near what the social constructivists in Queer Theory claim it to be.
+
+"The difference between gender and sex, exploring gender roles and attributes, understanding perceptions of masculinity and feminity within the family and across the lifecycle.
+
+Societies: changing norms and values."
+
+What they want to do is point out that in the past some of our ideas about what it means or looks like to be manly and that these are wholly socially constructed but as a matter of fact they're more like a distribution reflecting biological reality with some wiggle room in it that can take on different outward expressions. You can imagine a culture where women never wear dresses but still wear feminine clothing.
+
+But they want people to believe that society's norms and values change and therefore they can be changed and therefore they can be changed however we wish - socially engineered to be what we would like them to be.
+
+"Manifestations and consequences of gender biases
+
+- Gender Ideology
+- Critical Theory of Gender (gender roles and attributes)
+  - Socially constructed (not to do with sex)
+  - Imposed on you by a society that thinks men and women should be certain ways
+
+### 2. Sexual and Reproductive Health and HIV
+
+Sexuality and the life cycle
+Puberty, menopause, stigma, sexual problems
+
+Puberty:
+If your body goes through puberty and you have a gender identity that doesn't match your sex, then you have gone through non-consensual puberty. Didn't consent to the underlying biological realities of your life.
+
+Stigma:
+Anatomy - medical OK
+Reproductive process - medical OK
+How to use condoms and emergency contraception:
+- People put condoms on physical objects - practicing this
+- People doing this sexually (teachers)
+Pregnancy options and information:
+- Pushed by Planned Parenthood
+Legal and Safe abortion:
+- Unsafe is what republicans would want
+
+Understanding HIV and Other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including transmission and symptoms
+- We went through this in school - can be taught medically
+- can also be used to teach about the social constructivist view of HIV, as Foucault did
+  - Gays stigmatized by HIV
+
+HIV Prevention, Treatment, Care and Support:
+- You would think that this is what's sex ed is for (sure, good idea)
+- But they want to destigmatized sexually transmitted diseases
+
+Anti-Retroviral therapy and living with HIV:
+- Maybe a bit intense for kids. Helping them study to deal with having AIDS? Because planned parenthood is obsessed with this
+
+Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transimssion
+
+Injection Drug use and HIV
+
+Virginity Absenance and Faithfulness
+
+Sexual Response
+- Something that doesn't need to be covered
+- Socially liberal
+
+Social Expectations
+- Wide open door
+
+Self-Esteem and Empowerment
+
+Body Positivity (respect for the body)
+
+Myths and Stereotypes
+- Wide open door
+
+
+
+### 3. Sexual Rights and Sexual Citizenship
+Again, draw your attention to a simple fact that we're talking about Children.
+Children do not have Sexual Rights.
+Nobody is a Sexual Citizen.
+
+#### Sexual Citizenship
+Sexual Citizenship and Sex Education:
+Originally used to describe LGBTQ claims to rights based on identity relationships and practices. Scholars argued that citizenship is predicated on both public engagement and intimate practices. Sexual Citizenship has proven useful for mobilizing collective action for Queer Rights.
+
+The idea of full citizenship without regard to one's sexuality (Marriage Equality) is something
+
+##### Raising Strong Sexual Citizens
+"Sexual citizenship refers to people's right to say yes to the sex they want and no to the sex that they don't want, while also understanding that other people have an equivalent right and upholding those rights is highly relevant to sexual assault prevention."
+
+That has to do with consent, which is not the same thing we talked about. It has nothing to do with your full participation or access to participation in civil society based on your sexuality. This is something completely different. This is probably more accurately referred to as Sexual Agency - the ability an adult to say yes or no to sexual activity that you want or don't want.
+
+"Sexual citizenship is an acknowledgment that all humans are sexual beings and it is one's responsibility to learn and grow for themselves, their partners, and the world where our communities exist."
+
+Something completely different, yet again. What does this mean?
+
+"The notion of sexual citizenship emphasizes the often neglected interplay between regimes of sexuality and citizenship regimes, thus representing an important contribution to the studies of citizenship".
+
+It means a bunch of stuff at once, and it's really difficult to pear down exactly what it means. Certainly, it does have something to do with your ability to act as a sexual agent. It also definitely has something to do with full-civic participation: "Another strand of work conceives of sexual citizenship as being primarily about rights to participation in consumer society, linked to marketization and the consumption of goods and services."
+
+"In one of the early works on Sexual Citizenship Evans, from 1993, for example, argued that sexual citizenship is materially constructed through the dynamics of late capitalism. In particular, through the practices of cconsumption, he states that 'Sexual citizenship involves partial, private and primarily leisurely and lifestyle membership where sexual citizenship rights are chiefly expressed through `participation in commercial-private territories`'. Other, Bell and Binney, make a similar argument claiming that the `power that queer citizens enjoy is largely dependent on access to capital and credit'.
+
+So we have a lot of definitions of Sexual Citizenship.
+
+##### Concluding from these definitions
+Other than the sexual agency part, which is important beacuse we're talking about children who are claimed as being able to consent to sex that they want (which would be extended to them? - then it's okay? This is an argument from pedophiles / minor-attracted-persons where the deconstructionist/post-modern/Foucauldian view of age of consent being that if teh child is objecting it's bad but if the child actually wants it then it's good and it can be a very nourishing experience (a horrific argument because children CANNOT consent, thus the notion of a child wanting it cannot be a legitimate basis for consent having been given - if you speak to anyone who has experienced sexual grooming as a child, the whole game is to get the child to act as though they want it) A child being groomed into this cannot consent and the left broadly understands that this is a horrific crime.
+
+But beyond agency:
+
+Sexual citizenship refers to the idea that your full civic participation in society depends on your sex and sexuality. You as a man or woman somehow reflects how much full participation in both public/political and economic/consumer life that you have. What that actually looks like and how it plays out.
+
+The idea, for example, that gay people have to concentrate in gay market places (San Francisco had a gay scene that they cuold participate in, a gay economy, gay vendors, etc).
+
+Also, suffrage and access to civil unions and etc. The ability for you to be a full participant in civil society economically and politically.
+
+But, even further than that, if your sexuality has a stygma imposed upon it, or is considered marginal or oppressed, your oppression itself becomes a drain of resources - time and energy that you cannot devote to full civic participation as an everyday citizen - a further extended definition of sexual citizenship so that it means that those things aren't happening.
+
+A lot of stuff at once.
+
+Knowledge of international human rights and national policies, laws and structures that relate to people's sexuality.
+- Understanding where you stand with respect to Human Rights declarations
+- Sustainable development goals
+- Local state/federal laws
+
+A rights-based approach to sexual and reproductive rights. Your fundamental right: life, liberty and property aren't enough - we need intrinsic rights for sexuality and reproduction which somehow are excluded to that (or exclude that)
+
+Social, cultural and ethical barriers to exercising rights related to sexual and reproductive health.
+Understanding that sexuality and culture are diverse and dynamic. (Time to talk about queer politics!)
+
+Available services and resources, and how to access them.
+- Planned parenthood
+
+Participation
+- One of the categories!
+
+Practices and norms
+- What impacts it has on your full sexual citizenship?
+
+Diversity of sexual identities
+- queer pantheon of flags
+
+Advocacy
+- activism
+
+Choice
+- About what?
+
+Protection
+
+Negotiation Skills
+- How to negotiate sex?
+
+Consent and the right to have sex only when you are ready
+
+The right to freely express and explore one's sexuality in a safe, healthy and pleasurable way
+- Children?
+- Touch yourself and understand yourself as a sexual being
+- You have a right to touch yourself
+- Touching yourself is crucial to growth and development
+
+### 4. Pleasure
+Rooted in pleasure theory.
+
+#### Pleasure Theory
+- Pursuit of pleasure is a human right (the inalienable right to the pursuit of happiness - pleasure can serve as a proxy for happiness?)
+- There are complicated theories talking about this
+- United States (since Declaration of Independence)
+- Theorizing in pleasure theory explaining that pleasure is not "hedonic" so much as "udonic" and "erotic".
+- Eros: broader than just sexual arousal and sexual intercourse
+- Freud: learning is guided through pleasure and pain
+- Queer Theory follows from post-modernism and Critical Theory:
+  - Herbert Marcuse's Eros and Civilization 1955
+  - Other Frankfurt school books
+  - Twisting of Eros as the competitor to Death/Thanatos
+  - Rather than Jesus defeating death, Eros now stands in opposition to death
+- Erotic desire/libido is animating force of mankind
+- Industrial/Consumer society suppresses libido in favour of "productivity"
+  - Repress erotic energy to fuel productive work
+- Marvelous society but also filled with oppression and waste
+
+"Pleasure: having a positive approach to young people's sexuality. Understanding that sex should be enjoyable and consensual. Sexuality is a healthy and normal part of everybody's life. The biology and emotions behind the human sexual response"
+
+`We had a sex ed class in grade 6 and had a very ugly woman to teach sex ed. All the boys were excited to learn about sex and suddenly found out that the sex ed nurse was a really ugly woman. The first thing she did was get a gross smile on her face and say "I like sex a lot!". She laughed and laughed.`
+
+**Everybody's life? Adult life? They don't specify and they target kids**
+
+"Gender and Pleasure, Sexual Well-being, Masturbation. Love Lust and Relationships. Interpersonal Communications. The Diversity of Sexuality. First Sexual experience. Consent. Alcohol. Drugs and the implications of their use. Addressing stigma associated with pleasure (it's okay for you to enjoy this). Violence, particularly gender-based violence. Non-consensual sex and understanding what is acceptable. Consensual non-consent? You can do whatever you want with me in advanced - like a kink. Rights and laws.
+
+Community norms and myths regarding power and gender - so we'll go into Susan Brown-Miller's lies about rape being power-only and nothing to do with sex.
+
+Prevention including personal safety plans.
+
+Self-defense techniques. (Are they going to teach BJJ?).
+
+Understanding the dynamics of victims and abusers (will they do DARVO?).
+
+Appropriate referral mechanisms for survivors.
+
+Violence prevention through perpetrators and allies.
+
+Range of diversity in our lives - Faith, culture, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, ability/disability, hiv status and sexual orientation (None of these things have anything to do with)
+
+A positive view of diversity
+
+REcognizing discrimination, its damaging effects and what to do about it.
+
+Developing belief in equality (they mean Equity) and full equality in the collectivist sense.
+
+Supporting young people to move beyond
+
+
+
+### 5. Violence
+
+### 6. Diversity
+
+### 7. Relationships
+
+
+
+## The Components

queer/Queer Gnostic Cult.md

@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+
+# The Queer Gnostic Cult
+1:13
+
+The father is the unbegotten God (not brought into the world)
+The son is the self-begotten God (brings himself into the world)
+Holy spirit is the begotten God  (is what moves in the world)
+
+The undifferentiated ONE/ALL
+The self-begotten is the Mind of God. God Begot his own mind.
+The mental principle: the son of God. The Redeemer. God thought and the thought of God begot the Mind of God. God Begot himself.
+
+The Undifferentiated One: Unbegotten father
+The Son: The self-begotten mind
+Man: The begotten form (mind into matter)
+
+In Hermeticism, man is the third person of the Godhead. All of us.
+
+"The I is fulfilled through the We" - Paulo Freire
+
+The One, Mind and Man.
+
+Elevate through the levels of spiritual ascension within the begotten universe up to the level of remember that you are able to elevate yourself back up to the 2nd person of the Godhead and become self-begetting. The distinctions are an illusion - you are not distinct. You must elevate yourself spiritually up to the point of becoming self-begotten.
+
+Becoming your own Christ. Salvific self-knowlege. You save yourself with your Gnosis.
+
+And when Mankind remembers/realizes that he's the third person of the Godhead, and elevates himself spiritually to realizing he's his own saviour as the second person of the Godhead, then the end of history can arrive, things become perfect and we fold back into the undifferentiated One. We enter into the first person of the Godhead adn everything is made whole again.
+
+You hear this with the Communists: We all have to adopt socialist consciousness and accelerate the contradictions until eventually we all have one Communist mind. We become a perfect Species Being at which point we've achieved the mind of God, the Utopia begins and we fold back into the perfect Kingdom.
+
+That's the formula of Socialism or Marxist Communism. It's hermetic - the idea that Hegel saw through the Phenomenology of Spirit describing how spirit develops and, at the end, recognizes itself. How the Vertgeist becomes the Absolute Spirit. The spirit of the world that no longer sees itself as spirit. The perfect idea (absolute) is the perfected idea - no longer the objective idea and subjective idea separated - it is the perfect idea that knows itself to be the perfect idea.
+
+This ascension through these spiritual levels is characterized as a process of becoming. Becoming what you already are but have forgotten because you've been trapped into a mundane body, flung into the mundane world and don't realize that you are not just like God but that you are God.
+
+That sounds profoundly crazy - an introduction to Hermeticism.
+
+## The Corpus Hermeticum
+Broken into 17 books - the magical number in Dialectical Thinking for Pythagorean mathematical reasons.
+The spiral of Theodorus - 17 times around makes 1 turn and then you overlap at a higher level.
+17 is a transformational number
+17 contradictions of capitalism in Marxism
+17 generative themes necessary to Conscientize someone to a higher level of critical consciousness
+17 Sustainable Goals for the United Nations.
+
+### The Poimandres
+First book of the Corpus Hermeticum
+"You have taught me these things well as I wished, oh Nous. Now teach me how the way back is found".
+`Hermes is being taught by the mind of God and he is referring to him as "Nous", meaning "Mind" - Capitalized and retained in the Greek in this translation because the publishers want it to be very clear that it's what's meant by the divine holy mind of God - the second person of the Godhead.`
+
+He knows he's trapped in a world that he is not of and he is awakened to the fact that he is the third person of the Godhead, so to speak. He asks what is the way back to God, or oneness, or wholeness. The response:
+
+"First, in the dissolution of the material body, one gives the body itself up to change. The form you had becomes unseen and you surrender to the divine power your habitual character now inactive. The bodily senses return to their own sources, then they become parts again and rise for action while the seat of emotions and desire go to mechanical nature."
+
+"Thus, a man starts to rise up through the harmony of the cosmos. To the first plane, he surrenders the activity of growth and diminution. To the second, the means of evil - trickery now being inactive. To the third, covetous deceit, now inactive. And to the fourth, the eminence pertaining to ruler, being now without averous. To the fifth, impious daring and reckless audacity. To the sixth, evil impulses for wealth, all these being now inactive. To the seventh plane, the falsehood which waits in ambush."
+
+You have to elevate yourself through these 7 plans of existence. Give up on growing or shrinking, second on tricking and being evil, third on covet and deceit, fourth on greed and the power to rule, fifth you have to give up impulsiveness. Sixth, evil impulses for wealth have to go away. And then there is the seventh plane - the last falsehood which waits in ambush. How do you get rid of that, when you are a separate self?
+
+The first step was to give up the body itself. Then you go through spiritual transformations. Finally, in the end, You have to overcome the self itself - the falsehood which waits in ambush - that you are you.
+
+The first seven are the begotten realm, that you can ascend through, and then you can enter the self-begotten realm.
+
+"Then, stripped of the activities of the cosmos, he enters the substance of the eighth plane with his own power and he sings praises to the father with those who are present. Those who are near rejoicing at his coming. Being made like to those who are there together, he also hears certain powers which were above the eighth sphere, singing praises to God with sweet voice. Then, in due order, they ascend to the father and they surrender themselves to the powers, and becoming the powers they are merged in God. This is the end - the supreme good - for those who have hade the higher knowledge to become God."
+
+This is the end - the supreme good for those who have higher knowledge to become God.
+
+Well then, why do you delay? Should you not, having received all, become the guide to those who are worthy so that the human race may be saved by God through you? You are in hermetic belief to become the saviour of humanity and yourself. You elevate yourself to the plane of the self-begotten at which point you have attained the mind of god, at which point you have the capacity to save humanity and a moral obligation to do all of this.
+
+## Reflecting
+Doesn't this sound how Woke and Marxism operate? We all have to become Socialists, we have to give up all of our stuff, we have to own nothing and be happy, we have to give up all of our inequities so that we can ascend spiritually to being our species being, at which point the Utopia can begin to emerge and we will all be saved from ourselves and the world will be sustainable.
+
+In Hermeticism, using the magical principles, you are to renounce your body, you are to renounce to world as it is and you are to Spiritually Ascend.
+
+Become Zarathrusta - hide in a cave and then come down and tell everyone how to be the Superman.
+
+## Recap
+First, you must realize that you are not distinct from God.
+Than you must go through stages to spiritually purify yourself to transform your essence - to recollect the mind of god and to remember that you have the mind of God and are thus the mind of God which will allow you to elevate yourself to the salvific status of self-begotten which is Mind itself and then use that to save yourself and all of Mankind - this is the religious duty of Hermeticism, Marxism and Queer Theory.
+
+It's Unity - Criticism - Unity.
+
+First, you have to have the desire for unity, then you have to criticize, and self-criticize, and struggle out all those 7 forms of world desire to purge them out of you so you can come together into a new form of unity on a new basis, which is Socialist-Gnosis, and once you have the higher knowledge, you can become God.
+
+But it's not you individually, it's You Plural. That's the story of Marxism. Hermeticism driven by Gnosticism. It's a religion - ac ult religion - hundreds of millions of people have suffered and died as a result of us thinking it's an economic or social theory or political program when, in fact, it is a cult religion that will always result in civilization-scale Jonestown.
+
+Woke is not different.
+
+The sustainability crap, ESG, sustainable development goals of Agenda 2030 and their 17 sustainable development goals - not different. Same thing.
+
+The reason that it's like this is because Hermeticism believs that God doesn't know he's God, because he's the undifferentiated all and cannot directly know he is God, so  through Man and his place in creation, Man can realize his own divine nature and through that the illusion of all distinctions, which drive the spiritual failures that you have to ascend through. And in the mind of Man (as in the Mind of Man), so in the mind of God. Which are only distinct through illusion - the distinction isn't real anyway. Man is God. So when man realizes his true nature as God - as the undifferentiated All - God realizes that God is God and is actualized, at which point all becomes All - and All folds back into the All and all distinction is removed and thus all suffering/death etc are erased, because those things don't exist in God which is perfect and atemporal - always was and always is and always will be.
+
+Man, therefore, makes God realize that God is God (in Hermeticism) and by realizing that God is God, and that all distinction is an illusion, the world is perfected - Man gets to go home to his spiritual origins / birthright.
+
+Hegel, thus Marx, appropriated all of this machinery. Hegel was a hermeticist and he called his hermetic alchemy the dialectic. That's not particularly in doubt - it's worth checking out The Hermetic tradition. Hegel's big initiatory project is the phenomenology of spirit which is literally geared towards the idea that the spirit of the world - the socially constructed holy geist which is the point at which history unfolds through a dialectical process, until it finally realizes itself as the absolute spirit at teh end of history - the spirit that recognizes itself as itself. The Spirit that knows it's complete.
+
+Man's role in this, for hermeticism and Hegel, is to be the philosopher who thinks and makes the opposites collide through the principle of polarity, in order to force a synthesis - the removal of distinctions in the Hermetic project.
+
+The thing: Thesis
+The other: Antithesis
+
+The thing and its other - the divine and the mundane - have to be seen not as opposed but as parts of the same whole from a higher perspective. In other words, aufheben - this is the dialectic. This is also the expression of principle of polarity in hermeticism. So man, therefore, moves the dialectic through his thought, his reflection and intentional conflict using the Hegelian system in the mirror through which it should be reflected so you can understand it correctly.
+
+In other words, Hegel's system is the Vernunft - the higher level reason - that leads you to be able to understand what you're dealing with so that it all continues to point in the direction that it should go which is to the full understanding and actualization of spirit when all distinctions are removed.
+
+Hermeticism retooled in modern-era language. The idea, then, becomes the Gnostic demiurge for him, and when the idea realizes itself and awakens, it becomes the absolute idea or the absolute spirit. The world spirit becomes this vehicle by which this is happening (Vertgeist) and the phenomenology of spirit is talking about the evolution of the Vertgeist and it becoems the absolute spirit when it completes itself and realizes that it has completed itself.
+
+But what is the world spirit? It is the socially and culturally constructed phenomena around us. It's how we understand ourselves in the world as socially and culturally contingent beings. It's the spirit of the people of the world (what is the world? everything with all the conflicts contained within).
+
+This Hegelian system is modern era spiritualism. The new age of middle ages, finally codified for the modern period by looking scientific. What we have, then, is that the Spirit (like by the Fetzer Institute) is social-spiritual. What is meant here is that what Hegel is saying is that the thing we consider to be the Holy Spirit is actually the World Spirit - he continues it in the dialectical hermetic way as a process-oriented thing. The collective manifestation of man and his social and cultural aspects. What he thinks and thinks about himself and what it manifests into the spirit of teh different cultures of the world. The spiritual is no longer a spooky transcendental thing, but is cultural - it's socially constructed, as was taken from Rousseau (concept of Social Contract theory - we are in chains through the social contract that binds us - perfect the social contract to free ourselves from the social strictures).
+
+Hegel created Hermeticism, its Wizardry, but also takes from Rousseau and codifies the idea that the spiritual realm is socio-spiritual. Sociality of the universe of Man - what we would call social reality or cultural reality - to describe what's meant. That's where the spirit actually lives. Your soul - what you mean - is a piece of the undifferentiated Spirit - but that's the social constructions of social reality - so you're just a piece of social reality which is unfolding historically.
+
+Marx took this and retooled it and stuck it in economic conditions. He relocated Hegel's project - made it more violent and more angrily gnostic. Gnosticism becomes the motivation to rebel against an unjust world in Hermeticism. The Dialectical Materialism becomes his method - and it should be strongly suspected that Marx heavily plagiarized the Corpus Hermeticum or through an intermediary. His Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 are the Religious or Theological basis for a lot of his thought. In other words, all this crap about Hermeticism and Gnosticism turns out to be relevant because Queer Theory is a derivative of Marxist thought and Marx got it from Hegel and Hegel is a Hermeticist.
+
+Obvious in Queer Theory if we're honest about what's going on, especially with the trans aspects that are dealing not just with Gnostic - oh my god i'm trapped in my body and I have to escape the prison of my body - but we're also dealing with Hermetic aspects - my secret gender knowledge saves me - that's the Gnostic side. Hermetic aspects - taking on self-knowledge that will save yourself from Death, because your gender-Soul will actualize.
+
+You are learning to ascend through layers of socially-constructed imprisonment of Gender until you can divorce Gender from your body. Gender and Sex become wholly fluid and wholly dependant on Mind - mental phenomenon - and also on phenomenal and experiential knowing. Then you can understand yourself as you truly are outside the social constructions and you get to self-beget. And with transition-stuff - transgender stuff - you get to transform yourself as a sexual being and physically. Undergoing a process of discovering who you really are - your true Soul absent the social conditioning of the social-spiritual world, and then ou are becoming who you truly are as you slowly uncover and start to realize what you are. This is a process of becoming Divine and aware that you are Divine, like the "I, Joan" performance at a Shakespeare Globe Theater with a little hairy-potter looking girl with a little haircut saying "trans-people are sacred!" - because you are actually becoming divine - awakening your gender soul and overcoming the strictures. Your sexual soul is undergoing a social and gender liberation. Overcoming the socialization that has confined you in the prison of being, but you are doing so by transforming the prison and yourself through Hermetic means.
+
+The principle of correspondence is key to this - for Marx, what his cleverness was is the principle of correspondence, being "As above so below, as below so above" - Marx took it and said it was stated backwards - "We are the below. The proletariat, the worker, the everyman - these are below. Hegel was in the ideas -> above
+Marx said we have to take Hegel and stand him on his head - turn him upside down. Not "As Above so Below" but "As Below so Above" - that's what comes first. You start where we are - below - do activism (Praxis) to change society - that will, in turn:
+As Below -> Do Activism (Praxis) -> So Above (Society).
+
+The point is not to understand the world, the point is to change it.
+
+## Change from the Bottom
+Hitherto the philosophers have sought to understand the world - the point is to change it. To do Praxis. If you start below in the mundane fallen world, you do Praxis to change the world so the world that's bigger than you changes - that in turn causes society to get new norms (because you've done social activism to accept the new socialist norms, queer norms, critical race antiracist norms) and then people will be socialized into those new norms - Marx called this the Inversion of Praxis.
+
+The state of society, the existing Geist, the state of the social-spiritual is conditioning people - the world soul is conditioning the individual source - through the Inversion of Praxis. That's as above so below.
+
+If you grab the snake by the tail, starting at the bottom, and do activism to change society - the new society will change the next generation of men in the next turn of the screw.
+
+You get to condition everybody by doing activism which changes society which leads to the inversion of Praxis which leads to the Snake eating its own tail in an endless cycle of transformation until you get to the final point where there's no need for change because everything's undifferentiated species being - Communism.
+
+Transform society through Praxis - seize the means of production -> he doesn't mean economic production, he means production of human kind and society. Because you transform society through praxis to transform man in the next turn and then you repeat ad infinitum until liberation or Utopia from the bourgeois demiurge is at hand.
+
+## Queer Demiurge
+Queer theory does the same thing -> liberation from normalcy and normativity as a demiurgic force. You're going to change yourself through transition by making yourself ugly, getting purple hair, blue hair, getting fat, demanding people want you, etc. Then you will are going to do moral extortion to force society to accept people for "who you are".
+
+Why are so many leftist women intentionally sloppy and dirty and armpit hair and stinky and all this? Because it's a shit-test. You have to like the "real them". Why don't they dress up? Ask them - they'll tell you:
+
+"You only like the socially-imposed images of femininity - you don't like the real me. If you don't like me at my worst, you can't have me at my best". Sorry, their goal is for their to be no best. There is no best. It's a shit test.
+
+The goal of Praxis, in Queer Theory, is to change yourself so that you can force society into accepting you in your changed form. The new society that accepts those standards and obliterated standards will socialize people on the basis of inclusion and belonging and all of that. And then you do it again - pushing the envelope further - and eventually, through repetition, you land in Queer Liberation.
+
+The same program the same project - Hermeticism done in the Marxist/Gnostic form.
+
+This is done, as below, by positioning yourself as the Other to Normal Society. The Other enables the Thing to come to know itself.
+
+### Program Summary
+The program works by changing yourself and forcing society to affirm and celebrate and participate in you and your transformation. When society affirms your, ultimately, gnostic-spiritualist claim - what's happening is the social spirit (the socio-spiritual realm) has transformed and now you have a new level of Queer understanding. A new Queer Horizon has been reached. The Prison of the "Here and Now" has been broken free of.
+
+For Marx, you're becoming the Species Being or Communist Man or Social Man. In Queer Theory, Gender becomes a social construct - it becomes irrelevant, it becomes fluid - and eventually there is no gender and nobody's imprisoned by expectations about gender because there are no. Affirmation, acceptance, celebration, participation, and all of these things reify the cult belief and make it real. When society believes it in this gnostic nonsense it's "true" because that's what truth is for them: it's a socially-constructed concept. It's what society believes is true is what is true. So if you can convince society to believe that it's true - Queer Activism is to convince people that the abnormal has to subvert the normal until there is no exclusion by normalcy. Abolish the normal, as Bourgeois Private Property in Marxism.
+
+We see this in some of the big players: Marcuse (Eros in Civilization), Wilhelm Reich (Sexual Liberation), John Money (Introduction of Gender Identity - maybe no as deeply boiled in theory, but was a creeper with a gnostic/dualistic idea of gender being divorced from sex where it exists on a spiritual realm and impose itself on the body - this informed people like Judith Butler).
+
+# Queer Theory
+In some sense, the first Queer Theorist is not Gayle Rubin, Judith Butler or Eve Sedgwick. It's kind of Michel Foucault (who is maybe the progenitor of Queer Theory), but the first person who really points in the Queer Theory is the feminist Simone de Beauvoir.
+
+This is why the feminists can't defend against Queer Theory or Trans. The gender constructivism as the heart of their project leads to Trans. They're just espousing a conservative political point - it's all they're doing - they can't stop at "Women are Biologically Women", because that's just a political point. Biology is just another form of politics (and this is what follows once you accept that gender is socially-constructed, as opposed to a statistically-varied derivative of sex / tertiary sex characteristic).
+
+It is primarily Simone de Beauvoir's concept of the "Other" in a very hermetic way which becomes the key to the development of Queer Theory. Her most famous song is "The Second Sex" with women as the second sex.
+
+## Simone
+Women are incomprehensible except as a dialectical other to men. In turn, men are incomprehensible without the other by which they define themselves. Everybody would otherwise simply be human - but we have men and women. Men understand themselves in terms of women, and women are the second sex because they're subordinated - they're the "fallen other" mundane where Man sets himself up to be divine.
+
+### Stanford Encyclopedia
+Phenomenological account of womanhood - of what it means to become a woman and to enact womanhood. "One is not born but becomes woman".
+
+This inaugurates a sex-gender distinction and the social constructivism of gender and its criticism.
+
+*Critical constructivism (woke) is inaugurated with regard to sex and gender (The Second Sex).* What it says about her is:
+
+"What is not a matter of dispute is that the second sex gives us a vocabulary for analyzing how societal notions of femininity are lived and a method for critiquing them (critical constructivism). In this sense, Beauvoir offers a critical phenomenological analysis of the socially-constituted meanings of woman, and how one comes to assume and negotiate those meanings experientially."
+
+"For Beauvoir, one becomes a woman not just because others say so, but because she actively assumes her bodily existence in such a way."
+
+The social constructions of what it means to be female are being imposed on you by the doctor and society, but you have to seize the bull by its horns - one way or the other, by rejecting or accepting those characterizations, you have to become a woman - you can do so on the terms set by society (reify the construction of Gender), or you can reject those and try to do so with true agency.
+
+And, so, a person becomes his or her sex in the same way that one becomes a spiritual being. One realizes that one's nature is ultimately spiritual, but in this case it's one's sex that defines the relevant spiritual category. One's piece of the social spirit, or the social-spiritual realm of Hegel - and so you get to choose: are you going to go along with it, or reject it? Are you going to go along with it, or try to find true agency outside of those constructions?
+
+This is the Critical Constructivist approach - Woke Feminism, 1949-style.
+
+"Beauvoir's account of becoming is crucial to understanding how human beings called women come into existence. Beauvoir's target here is essentialist arguments that view woman as a biological fact."
+
+What's happening, then, is that "mundane" biological reality, and its consequences, are the target - because she's angry at it - she's gnostic - she's angry that she was born into a body as a woman and that there are patriarchal demiurgic forces that force her to be a woman in a certain way. Being a woman must be understood in this social spiritual way. You must free that realm through the completion of that social spirit and that results in the process of intentionally becoming a woman.
+
+"Beauvoir believes it to be faulty to accept the common sense idea that to be born with certain genitalia or reproductive capacities is to be born a woman. In rejecting this position, asserted in the most famous line of the second sex, she pursues the first rule of phenomenology: Identify your assumptions, treat them as prejudices and put them aside."
+
+So everything you take for granted is a prejudice -> probably wrong and something that can be ignored. You can see how stupidly one would think based on this line of reasoning.
+
+"Do not bring them back into play until and unless they have been validated by experience". (Universalized social-spiritual experience. Lived experience)
+
+"Accordingly, she offers a descriptive account of how some human beings become women as a matter of living an imposed social identity routed in and generated by particular historical, economic and political conditions, as well as social and moral conventions." (in other words, Hegel's and Marx's social-spiritual gnosticism is the framing in which she's understanding the becoming of a woman. Queer Theory is Queer Gnosticism).
+
+"On this view, "woman is an invention, but also a lived, embodied reality"". (Gnosis of what it means to be and become a woman is the experiential bridge between the material world and they social-spiritual world in which womanhood has true higher understanding and meaning")
+
+"For Beauvoir, the social destiny - those who become women - are expected and often coerced to assume as bound up with heterosexism. Such that to become a woman is to be made and make oneself an object for men."
+
+`You're not being forced - you're being tricked into a false spirituality - a false consciousness - of what it means to be who you are - and, thus, you are actually becoming the puppet of the social spirit that's trapping you - the demiurge of society which, in this case, is Patriarchy. You're internalizing the misogyny/PAtriarchy and doing it to yourself. You're becoming a plaything for men because you're being conditioned by men to want to become the plaything for men - an object.`
+
+"The detriment of such self-making (self-begetting),Beauvoir shows, is that a woman comes to live in an existence relative to men. In doing so, a woman becomes the other (the lower subordinated and mundane form - In Hermeticism thats the way that the higher form can come to know what it is and realize that they're not different). Mother are usually accomplice to the self-making as being made the other, although a condition of oppression, also bestows recognition and self-justification in a Patriarchal milieu."
+
+Women are fallen by accepting their status as the other to the divine male, which gives the whole binary and dynamic meaning, but they can be made conscious/gnostic to this fact and save themselves by intentionally reversing it - by resisting it and gaining one's own agency - in other words, saving yourself from the demiurge by becoming a woman on your own terms absent the patriarchy, which then becomes the puzzle.
+
+"Beauvoir also sees becoming woman in accepting womanhood, though absent patriarchal constraint upon it."
+
+`Become a woman in a liberated fashion yb avoiding all of the subtleties of Patriarchy. Womanhood being liberated from its defining binary absent the patriarchal demiurge's influence is the true nature of womanhood, so you're going to self-beget as a woman. Knowing and pursuing this is the gnosticism.`
+
+The feminists's views on virtually everything follow from this, as does all of Queer Theory.
+
+### Abortion
+The feminist view on abortion - that they have to be absolutely free from the reproductive capacities of the body they were born into by whatever technological intervention they can have. - is a gnostic position. They were flung into a woman's body and can be flung into a pregnancy by accident that they didn't choose - that means motherhood is forced upon them, forced birth, forced puberty, forced being into the world the flungness of being. This is how they think about abortion. There are 3 positions on abortion:
+- One trying to understand it
+- One that's socially conservative and completely against it
+- One that believes it's an imprisoning imposition upon a woman's existence to possibly have been born with a uterus so they can possibly become pregnant.
+
+If you think there are just 2 positions, you have nothing to add to that conversation. You understand the Right wing side and probably understand the middle side, but you have absolutely no idea what's going on with the radical left side, which is actually driving most of the dynamic between he Far Right and Far Left.
+
+"Embodiment is central for Beauvoir. The body may imprison the soul unless we figure out how to liberate the soul through the fulfillment of it actually means to be embodied as such, but absent social expectation and patriarchal socialization."
+
+Women are liberated by being able to become women as women, not as dialectical other to men. (This is literally a description of esoteric religion).
+
+"This sets up Foucault for his contention that the soul actually, therefore, imprisons the body (thus Butler and all the rest later, even as at direction which necessarily refutes Beauvoir's intention)".
+
+Foucault becomes the progenitor of Queer Theory, more so than Beauvoir, because she was so distinctly Feminist.
+
+## Foucault
+David Halperin is a hagiographer of Foucault. He gave the first authoritative definition for "Queer", which is at the center of Queer Theory. Queer Theory got its name a few years earlier from Theresa De La Retis (branding of the new radical sexual theory -> Radical Politics of Sex by Gayle Rubin, for example).
+
+Halperin wrote a book in 1995 called "St Foucault" where he defines "Queer". He answers what queer is in that book and uses Foucault as the lense (the canonization of Foucault as a Queer Saint). His answer is:
+- It is an identity of pure resistance
+- An identity of pure becoming
+- An identity without an essence (he uses this phrase more than once)
+
+For example, "Self-fashioning" (self-begetting).
+
+Recommended reading by the Gospel Coalition.
+
+We will skip the part of his book where he talks about anal yoga (anal fisting) as a transformative practice. Instead, we talk about the concept of Queer in his treatment of Foucault.
+
+"To shift the position of the homosexual from that of object to subject is therefore to make available to Lesbians and Gay men a new kind of sexual identity - one that is characterized by its lack of a clear definitional content. The homosexual subject can now claim an identity without an essence. To do so is to reverse the logic of the supplement and to make use of the vacancy left by the evacuation of the contradictory and incoherent definitional content of the homosexual, in order to take up instead a position that is and always had been defined wholly relationally by its distance to and difference from the normative."
+
+Queer means it's something defined in terms of its distance to and difference from the normative. In other words, we have that same other phenomenon we've just heard from Beauvoir, where woman is Other now Homosexual is Other, and it's being assumed within the concept of homosexuality as being other to heterosexuality. And Halperin says that what Queer does is shift outside/sidestep that dynamic, leaving a vacuum while doing so. By defining Queer absent the concept that gives it its meaning, its difference from heterosexuality, you sidestep the dynamic. Like defining woman absent Patriarchy on her own terms. That heterosexuality sets the standard for what heterosexuality means and now heterosexuality can be defined absent that demiurgic heteronormative force.
+
+And so Gnosis would be the perception of this dynamic and the understanding that it is imposed and inscribed upon people so that you can sidestep it by being queer and thus being liberated from it by rejecting the hegemony of the binary itself.
+
+"Homosexuality can now be constituted not substantively but oppositionally. Not by what it is, but by where it is and how it operates. Those who knowingly operate such a marginal location (intentional marginalization) to assume a de-essentialized identity that is purely positional in character (that which is outside of heterosexuality) are properly speaking not gay but queer".
+
+So that's your first real definition of Queer in Queer Theory. Queer means knowingly opposing the so-called essentializing or demiurgic power of normativity that happens through sex/gender sexuality as a result of biology in society. It's literally defined in terms of a salvific knowledge, or gnosis, about the truly esoteric nature (not the exoteric nature of sex, gender and sexuality that we all understand and see and talk about, but an esoteric nature of what it really means to be that that's hidden - isn't availale within the prevailing oppressi and, thus, carceral framework).
+
+#### Foucault
+He thought everything was a Prison. Everything functions in terms of how it becomes a prison for Being. His decontruction was meant to expand the potentialities of Being, because you're breaking down the bars and walls of the prison of Being. The demiurge doesn't just build the wall - he builds the world as a prison - he's your prison warden. That's a carceral framework (like going to jail). You're incarcerated in your Beingness.
+
+The goal here is to position yourself as the dissolver of the prison walls.
+
+Queer oppositionalism, then, is precisely what a Queer Gnostic would do with themselves - to affect that social-spiritual jailbreak from heteronormativity (a prison of Being) built out of social norms and constructions around issues of sex gender and sexuality (the Closet).
+
+Unlike gay identity which, though deliberately proclaimed in an act of affirmation, is nonetheless rooted in the positive fact of homosexual object choice, Queer identity need not be grounded in any positive truth, or in any stable reality.
+
+You don't have to affirm yourself as queer, you just have to stop being "not queer". Gay identity affirms this demiurgic system. Gays against groomers? You're actually affirming the system (this is why gays are under attack by the Queer Theory. Why the T and the Q don't get along with the LGB). Because you are just occupying yourself as the Other in the same way as the woman who affirms herself as the plaything of men.
+
+It's dead from a Gnostic or Activist perspective - it's not useful for you to be doing that. If you're coming out and affirming yourself as Gay or Lesbian - you're just saying "I'm imprisoned and I know it, and I love the bars. I love my prison warden". Queer, however, rejects the concept of the prison entirely (along with truth and stable reality, which is what those bars are).
+
+Think for a moment about how destructive that is for a child. It'll destroy adult minds as well, but pause to imagine how destructive it is for a child to encounter.
+
+"As the very word implies, Queer does not name some natural kind, or refer to some determinate object. It acquires its meaning from its oppositional relation to the norm. Queer is, by definition, whatever is at odds with the normal, the legitimate and the dominant. There is nothing in particular to which it necessarily refers - it is an identity without an essence."
+
+In other words, Queer means you've gnostically awoken to the fact that you are in imprisoned by the realities of sex and sexuality, and you're in gnostic angry defiance of that prison and the facts of human sex and sexuality, because you see and resent those things as a demonic constructor that's portraying itself as good and natural. It is a rebellion against reality for the crime of being in a body that is inherently sexed and sexual.
+
+"Queer, then, demarcates not a positivity but a positionality vis-a-vis the normative. A positionality that is not restricted to Lesbians and Gay men but is, in fact, available to anyone who is or feels marginalized because of his or her sexual practices".
+
+In other words, perverts. To pull people, especially kids, into this cult, they will sell it as though anyone who has specialist or different or peculiar sexual practices, interests or desires. And they can convince kids and teenagers that that's anyone: you're demisexual, you're graysexual, you're amorphous asexual, whatever. A million different sexualities, romantic identities, gender identities, etc and whatever the QUIRKS of your personality are, as a teenager just starting to see this stuff and figure this stuff out - they can convince you that that's YOU! There's an identity for that! and it has a FLAG!! and All of these cool symbols and a secret language to go along with it. They can convince kids that everyone is queer because tehy have marginalized sexual practices - because they can take the finest details of a personality and say "that's a sexuality that the world doesn't yet recognize!" And convince them they're queer and pull them into the cult.
+
+He gives some examples: "It could include some married couples without children, for example. Or even, who knows, some married couples with children. With, perhaps, very naughty children"
+
+"Queer, in any case, does not designate a class of already objectified pathologies or perversions. Rather, it describes a horizon of possibility whose precise content and heterogenous scope cannot, in principle, be delimited in advance".
+
+Queer theory has no bottom point. THere is no end to how perverse it can be, how far it can twist, how much it can destroy. Anything that becomes hormative has to become Queer and destroyed. Anything accepted has to be challenged with queer theory further.
+
+"Queerness is not yet here. Queerness is an ideality. Put another way, we are not yet queer. We may never touch queerness, but we can feel it as the warm illumination of a horizone imbued with potentiality. We have nevr been Queer, yet Queerness exists as an ideality that can be distilled from the past and is used to imagine a future. The future is Queerness' domain. Queerness is a structuring and educated mode of desiring that allows us to see and feel beyond the quagmire of the present. The here and now is a prison house."
+
+Esteban Munoz 2009 Cruising Utopia as quoted by Dragqueen Pedagogy paper.
+
+"It is from the eccentric positionality occupied by the queer subject that it may become possible to envision a variety of possibilities for reordering the relations among sexual behaviours, erotic identities, constructions of gender, forms ofo knowledge, regimes o enunciation,modes of slf-constitution in practices of community for restructuring, that is, the relation among power, truth and desire."
+
+What he's saying is that Queer Gnosis becomes a platform from which Queer transformation can be launched - designed to change the social-spiritual dimension, as Hegel had it, of human existence with regard to sex, gender and sexuality under the auspices of modern and postmodern esotericism. This is a perverse pagan religion visited on your kids and being called liberation.
+
+How does he bring Foucault into this?
+
+"Homosexuality, for Foucault, is a spiritual exercise, insofar as it consists in an art or style of life in which individuals transform their modes of existence and ultimately themselves."
+
+In other words, Foucault is a Queer Hermeticist in practice. He is motivated by a raw, deconstructive, Queer, gnostic belief. Gnosticism is the motivation, hermeticism is the means, and what we're dealing with in Queer Theory is Queer Gnosticism.
+
+"Homosexuality is not a psychological condition that we discover but a way of Being that we practice in order to redefine the meaning of who we are and what we do, in order to make ourselves and our world more gay! As such, it constitutes a modern form of ascesis."
+
+Exactly like you saw with the Hermeticist and Gnostics 2000 years ago. Pulling intentionally away from the existing world. Being gay, as ascesis, according to Foucault. Here you're not physically pulling out by meditating in a cave. You're doing it morally by adopting Queer morals - Queer ways of being and living, etc, as a spiritual awakening. But not just as a spiritual awakening for yourself, but for the purposes of transforming yourself and the world around you. For Queer hermetic alchemy, the quote is:
+
+Why do you become homosexual? To make ourselves and the world more Gay.
+
+Ascetics, like Buddhists, often believe that they can go off and withdraw into a cave and meditate on the spiritual advancement of humanity overall, and that makes the whole world advance spiritually - making it more peaceful, and so on. This is the same thing, but you're doing it by being Queer.
+
+"By withdrawing from sexual norms in society, you thus therefore can make the world more gay."
+
+It's undeniably a social spiritual practice, then. It's undeniably a cult religion. Put it into your head that we're reading a Buddhist tract - talking about a bodhisattva that's been enlightened and remains in the world so he can transform the world and save others from the cycle of samsara.
+
+"Foucault proposes to us, then, instead of treating homosexuality as an occasion to articulate the secret truth of our own desires, we might ask ourselves: “What sorts of relations can be established, invented, multiplied, modulated through our homosexuality. The problem is not to discover in oneself the truth of one's sex, but rather to use, from now on, one's sexuality to achieve a multiplicity of types of relations”"
+
+Homosexuality is not about saving yourself from the gnostic prison of being, alone, but it's actually about saving the world from its own suffering through that same set of social relations. So we can transform and end all the suffering caused through the demiurge's power of establishing norms that are built around the physical realities of sex and sexuality that they deny. (They deny biology, btw).
+
+"Expanding on this theme, Foucault expressed himself as follows:
+It's up to us to advance into a homosexual aesthesis, a transformative Queer Practice of the Self. We might be able to define and develop a way of life that, in turn, can yield a culture and an ethics and "new forms of relationship, new forms of knowledge, new modes of creativity and new possibilities of love"."
+
+"Foucault insisted that homosexuality did not name an already existing form of desire but was rather something to be desired. Our task is therefore to become homosexual, not to persist in acknowledging that we are."
+
+One is not born but becomes (woman/homosexual/queer).
+
+"To put it more precisely, what Foucault meant was that our task is to become Queer.".
+
+Having achieved spiritual awakening and gnosis - a saving self-knowledge that allows you to break jail in a prison of Being in a world that functions like a prison full of unnecessary suffering through norms and expectations about sex and sexuality. it is religious awakening to become Queer, so you can transform teh world and end that situation.
+
+"For his remarks make sense only if he understood his term homosexuality according to my definition of Queer. As an identity without an essence not a given condition but a horizon of possibility an opportunity for self-transformation, a Queer potential. Just like Beauvoir - you become queer increasingly by rejecting the "Demiurge's"

queer/TransformingTheChild.md

@@ -165,4 +165,41 @@ You have "male" and "female" which are just like 2/13 of the possible types alon
 
 The system of sex is as a developed strategy for reproduction, with 2 strategies. Male and female describe them.
 
-Everything else here is a description of something as a deviation/complication/dysfunction relative to the strategy. On their own, they don't describe anything
+Everything else here is a description of something as a deviation/complication/dysfunction relative to the strategy. On their own, they don't describe anything
+
+# Bruno Chaouat's Theory of Male Transhumanistic Fantasy
+September 11, 2023
+
+- Man wishes to be self-made without the need for a woman or sex
+- Men have greater anxiety about death compared to women
+  - Men cannot give birth
+  - There are social expectations for men to produce something of worth during their lifetime
+- Circumvent relation to the other sex
+  - Marx's "man in himself"
+  - Immortalizing the self
+  - One's work becomes them or is them as reflected by others
+- Decline of this fantasy in art form
+- Rise of fulfilling fantasy through the material (immanent)
+- Upload myself into a higher level plane of existence
+  - Infect the world with myself
+  - Humanize the world into a form that would revive my essence
+
+# The Cult Religion
+April 2, 2023
+
+`Yes, a cult religion`
+
+- Targets initiates
+- Induces anxiety
+- Introduces a mythology
+- Codifies the world and places the target in it
+- Induces guilt and anger
+- Gives target a way out:
+  - ritual to affirm and confess
+  - Life-long commitment to doing the work of self purification
+- Distance the target from family
+- Do the work (create conflict)
+- Bring into new family (found family)
+
+And it has been going on for al ong time. Is it simply ideology seeping in? I remember that public school had certain things that I criticized, such as a lack of insight from teachers who played favouritism and who couldn't regulate the bullying that would take place on tehir watch. There were persons providing the appearance of expertise in certain ideas, but without the insight to help those who perform the worst, or who are most distracted by the treatment they receive from their peers. On the one hand, why should that become their priority? They have places to be and I often feel the same way. But this has more to do with reaching a particular level of success and happiness and, more importantly, it has to do with the fact that assertions are made on the part of the educator which either shouldn't be made, or if they are made, they should be made by consolidating these issues as well. The fact that the assertions are made (you don't work hard and you have mental illness) without even mentioning the other factors shows that there is less of a willingness to help people work through issues and make improvement and more of a willingness to achieve maximum conformation and assimilation without resistance.
+

queer/double_negation.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ We highlighted the manner in which the human mind is prone to adapting an expect
 ## Queer Negation
 The Queer activist insists that some are characterized by unnormal forms and behaviours and that this puts them into the position of being oppressed by a social structure which values normalcy. It also contends that what is imposed as normal has come to have been asserted as such by those who have the power to set norms, and that they do this to maintain their access to power.
 
-Furthermore, it suggests that as long as oppression exists, it becomes our duty to identify queerly in order to push back against the normalizing aspects of society, since it is these normalizing aspects which are maintaining oppression.
+Furthermore, it suggests that as long as oppression exists, it becomes our duty to identify queerly in order to push back against the normalizing aspects of society or at least to maximimze the likelihood of queer identification, since it is these normalizing aspects which are maintaining oppression.
 - Those who are not normal are oppressed by those with power who set or maintain the norms
 - Moral impetus to identify "antinormal" as a strategy of eliminating oppression
 
@@ -262,7 +262,18 @@ We will go about describing the gnostic mindset as it affects our world today.
   - detriment of not participating
 
 ## Gnostic Covidism
-Covidism as a form of gnosticism is an eye-opening framing because it explains the multitudes who have completely come to disregard the benefits of the natural state of affairs in social, biological being - exposure to one another's biology
+Covidism as a form of gnosticism is an eye-opening framing because it explains the multitudes who have completely come to disregard the benefits of the natural state of affairs in social, biological being - exposure to one another's biology. That is, the natural state of affairs has always been biological exposure.
+
+### Aversions to Infinite Regress
+This isn't the first time that we come upon the discussion of whether it is considered scientific or even just sensible and valuable to consider questions of the infinite regress, particularly when looking at history and evolution. One might say that we find ourselves in a circumstance where we either a) no longer need to worry about such matters or b) the environment is such that it renders evolutionarily-mediated adaptations as completely irrelevant.
+
+The other manner of dismissing questions of an Infinite Regress is to say that choosing how to spend our time means choosing amongst activities which lead to progress in our particular set of matters, or that those activities are best judged along the dimension of progress in relation to those affairs and that our knowledge base is such that we can, with high certainty, choose to implement changes or to completely avoid concerns that we might otherwise have, if considering a historical or evolutionary mode of conception.
+
+It's impossible to get around the historical fact of biological exposure, at all the worst times, and it having occurred in a manner which informs our biological structure and our ecological situation. We can claim that these things are only worth studying in a narrower frame, but that isn't immediately obvious, and is disposed to hubris and blindedness. It becomes far too easy to claim that something new is the primary aspect of consideration, because you can now no longer regard any historical or evolutionary facts as being relevant. You can avoid massive parts of the discussion about human nature by eliminating anything beyond immediate superficial analysis.
+
+There's also the related factor of biological feasibility - meaning that the organism achieved and maintained biological feasibility not simply in spite of the conditions it encountered, but through having been moulded by those conditions.
+
+We also needn't note or understand whether there are lasting features or characteristics in humanity that aren't just an arbitrary feature of human embodied experience. Do we no longer need to understand our histories? Could the kstudy of human knowledge have been averted.
 
 ### Bio-Gnosis
 - Aware of the dangers of biology
@@ -273,8 +284,28 @@ All biological interactions presuppose that there is a viable nature that can yi
 
 Exposure to even more harm beyond the difficulty of life is akin to evil treachery which only serves capitalist and white heteronormative interests.
 
+#### Initial States
+As the narrative of COVID was normalized, many completely abandonned the idea that we could have a healthy adaptive response to any pathogen. That is that there is a finite capacity for adapting to anything, especially a pathogen, and that the adaptation itself is also deleterious to one's health in any theoretical absolute or narrowly scoped evaluation, and that as such we should consider our capacity to evolve with technology to support an ethical argument that we should avoid immunological adaptation in all situations except those expressly sought for specific and deliberate adaptation.
+
+The idea here is that we can choose what particular antigen to adapt to, the manner in which we deliver it to the body, the time of administration, the target recipients, and so forth. With medical research and observational study of use, we can ensure that we have the most comprehensive understanding of these adaptations that is possible, and that this always is a more complete view than when contrasted when whatever adaptations are manifesting under the circumstance of raw living itself, which is brutal, unrelenting and a chaotic and perilous soup of entropic violence.
+
+With these two framings, it's clear that one of them is a proposition for something that we can consent to, and that the other is not.
+
+#### Who Consents
+Further to the question of whether one consents to what they themselves choose to administer to themselves, or whether one chooses to allow themselves to inhabit the circumstances and environments which lead to their being exposed to something, there comes a new set of questions at another level of indirection: the exposure to one's peers.
+
+Here we are clear that, in light of our improved understanding of the jumbled pathogenic landscape which we are already subjected to, we are now going to consider whether the fact of our being able to choose an adaptation, to mitigate some of that chaos, suffices as requirement to consider that those who fail to perform an adaptive action using a documented strategy or using a readily available tool or product are not causing others to be committed to an adaptive process to which they have not consented. Furthermore, we wish to understand whether one's failure to attempt the mitigatory strategy is itself constituting a form of consent, both in terms of one's intention to allow personal exposure and in terms of extending that exposure to others, by virtue communicating an explicit and deliberate choice to accept conditions which can be argued to potentiate a form of exposure of interest, with an understanding that such an exposure confers the undertaking of a transaction to which the other party is not necessarily privy nor, if even so, is not able to provide explicit consent. Is this an implicit act of choosing to give their consent to the potential occurrences which may result, and can they be deemed accountable for the consequences?
+
 ### Better Past or Future
-Is this a recolltion to a better world/time? It doesn't appear as such at first until you realize that they always presuppose that we had less volatile pathogenic circumstances prior to now, because we allowed capitalist greed to destroy efforts to make our world safer and more stable.
+Is this the recollection of a better world of the past? At first it may not appear as such - what a ridiculous suggestion.
+
+But you should see that they in fact do refer to a "better past", at least in the sense of likelihood or rate of encountering a deadly pathogen whose novel aspect was the product of a process whose of activity or differentiation was previously more modest. This is the dimension of corruption - the evidence not simply of things not being right in this world, but of the ways in which things are not right. That is, it informs us of the manner in which we should understand whether things are not right in this world.
+
+#### Made Unright
+In learning of this new mode of interpretation and evaluation for understanding whether the circumstance of the world is in right order, we are also proposing that this permutation of the world, in which a particular attribute can be logically discerned, is one for which the operations and activity which lead to its actuality are the effect of a human's activity, whether that activity is deliberate insofar as it relates to the outcome, and whether that activity and its contribution to that effect is best understood in a way which supports these assertions.
+
+#### How It Was
+Realize that it's presupposed that we had less volatile pathogenic circumstances prior to now, at least insofar as mutation or zoonotic transmission of a pathogen, and that in recent history there has been an acceleration in rate of occurrence or an increasing of the likelihood because we allowed capitalist greed to destroy efforts to make our world safer and more stable.
 
 If climate change causes migrations of species such as to place the world into a configuration where biological obscenity takes place, then the supposition is that a previous, undisturbed world was more harmonious and not as liable to produce pathogens which seemed to be a "biological misstep".
 
@@ -282,7 +313,7 @@ But what is the mistake of biological life prior to capitalism and human technol
 
 Whether that can be due to volitional work capacity, or simply capacity for self-reflection/awareness, it's something which becomes sought in Praxis (with the attitude that any unyet understood aspects of such a pursuit will be continuously better realized through each conflict).
 
-Just one of our remarkable talents, separating ourselves from the animals, serves to make existence utterly unbearable given the fact that we must anticipate our failure, suffering and ultimtae demise, knowing full-well that the childish exicitement and curiosity of trying something new as a child simply has been kept from us as we continuously negate those parts of our personas.
+Just one of our remarkable talents, separating ourselves from the animals, serves to make existence utterly unbearable given the fact that we must anticipate our failure, suffering and ultimate demise, knowing full-well that the childish excitement and curiosity of trying something new as a child simply has been kept from us as we continuously negate those parts of our personas.
 
 # Viral Genome
 February 7, 2023
@@ -798,4 +829,246 @@ Any prospect of uncovering or declaring a new identity becomes evidence that the
 
 This all means that there will be a bias for seekign to declare new identities over something and though it can be so easily performed with simple redundancies, that practice creates momentum for identity declaration and the prospect of declaring a liberatory identity carries the weight of itself being a form of liberatory praxis based on the theories which inform the applied whole-child model.
 
-### Sin and Karma
+### Sin and Karma
+April 8, 2023
+
+One must remember that for them, though they use the word frequently, it's not about process (at least, not in terms of the quality of process). They have a mystical outlook and already believe that they see the end of history, or at least feel that they have a sense/intuition as to the direction things will proceed by until reaching that endpoint. So, for them, they needn't critique the process itself (they will appear to be doing that, but what they are actually doing is critiquing something to suggest that it is not actually part of the process to which they are adhering, and if there is any doubt they will simply frame their process using a description from a higher level, or a reference to the higher level through a shared characteristic from the low level).
+
+For them, sin in this context is simply a failure to demonsrate loyalty to the process by virtue of its high-level description and ultimate endpoint, which has to be the conformed definition of an end of history or idealistic target. They define all of these things through the dialectic, such as by continuously replacing the thing they criticize with a thing which even does that which was the meat of their criticism (but at least now it's being done explicitly and with intention).
+
+
+# ES Acronyms
+April 9, 2023
+
+Something that isn't adequately recognized in our understanding of some of the new industry regulations / standards is not that they are an imposition of demands on certain companies, or even that they produce new market dynamics which can be used to provide disparate advantages to certain entities within an industry, but that it is a step in the dissolution of the ability for humans to vote.
+
+Not only can this be seen in the sense that the new regulations are ones which are formulated without input from citizens, or that they are applied without agreement and acknowledgment by citizens, but it is becoming readily appraent that citizens are losing the ability to vote with their dollras or feet.
+
+That is to say, profitability is being replaced with financability, and since everything works within bubbles, it is less important for a company to turn a profit than it is for them to adhere to these regulations, emphasizing top-down dynamics which naturally extend from centralized, authoritative interests rather than those that have culminated from the ieas, sentiments and behavours of the ppulace or, specifically, public citizenry.
+
+It might seem that these affect certain industries and the largest companies, but we have seen how, in the past 3 years, a declaration of emergency leads to sudden and aggressive destruction and transfer of their assets into these largest of corporations which are most significantly participating in all of the newly instantiated market regulations, namely those of inclusion and sustainability or, put another way, those that are congruent to the UN SDGs.
+
+# Structured like a Bitch
+April, 2023
+
+Everyone has to be a victim of the structure in order to have fire and the structure is the root of every problem.
+
+Remember younger years where, no matter who you are, you had a different conception of what is possible and why? Not necessarily what is technically possible, but what the range and quality of one's intuited expectations happen to be. It might be something only worth representing as a phenomenological event, that is, a snapshot of your neuropsychological state, the visually expressed generation which accompanies the moment of conception, and so forth.
+
+...
+
+# Other
+April 2023
+
+Is everyone so afraid of being an other? Does the fact of being an other offend them so greatly that they are unable to enjoy being itself? Why have a desire for something leading to absolution in the material realm? If truly you believe that this is the order of things for all, then why not have faith that it comes to pass?
+
+`Commentary needed on Rosa Luxemburg's natural progression of Socialism VS state-mediated conscious instigation of proletarian revolution argued by Gyorg Lukacs in terms of the Bolsheviks`
+
+Simone de Beauvoir speaks of the female itself as though it is chiefly defined as Other to male, is forced to accept this by men, and that somehow this distinction might not exist if not for this dynamic (the last part is implied). But realy, how would you wish for it to be different? Could it be different at the most fundamental levels, or is this focus taking place at another level?
+
+The truth is that once you make your case and predicate it on woman-ness, or the concept of an identity, then the reactionarism and even duty becomes to push back on it anywhere you might relate, and this naturally lends to the outlook that if you are angry, or discontent, then you now have a means of making your case at any level you where you feel comfortable to proceed.
+
+And so let's think about how this fundamentally leads to a gnostic outlook. A conflation of the naturally emergent structure yielding a female experience and phenomenology with the assertion that one's enforced role in society is one of performing an invitation to serve and be violated in such ways that exacerbate the subjugation.
+
+The problem with this mode of protest is that, regadless of one's intuition or beliefs, the protest itself is seen as performative.
+
+# Effeminate Bigotry
+April 15, 2023
+
+`Predicated on the proposal that a enhanced image of a man posing effeminately and made to look female is proof that a man has now become a woman`
+
+This has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
+- Photoshopped pictures indicate that this is again something asserted artificially
+  - even your example is positing that reality is supplanted as what can be actualized per someone's beliefs as prompted through greater indirection, if necessary
+  - Also, lends to the concept of a religion which sees reality as being composed through belief as opposed to something that is
+  - It is becoming through the beliefs and language.
+  - If, indeed, these people pass as well as someone of teh biological sex that they are mimicking, then there is really no problem - but that isn't the issue at hand
+
+What we have here is a demand for legal support to put those who couldn't possibly pass in thos environments, and this invites many issues being avoided (purposefully?) with your heavily tampered representations. Buck Angel doesn't have this issue, but a large overweight man with sexual pathology can and will take advantage of teh social means of acting out the fantasies bound to his pathologies, and one can call another names for having brought it up, but that doesn't really matter to someone who is speaking to reveal truth rather than seeking operational success at all costs.
+
+So why even try to conflate these things? Obviously the issue has to do with either those who do not present in a way which convinces others that they are in the appropriate washroom, as well as those who, regardless of how they present, are engaging in activities which cause one to be understood as either trespassing or harassing in some capacity.
+
+# Covid Sensibility
+
+The covid narrative was the ultitae reset for instilling a new biologically mediated (psychologically pronounced) sensibility for Socialism. The redistribution schemes, the perilous outlook towards a perceived common enemy that can supposedly only be defeated, or at least mitigated, through submission to the state and its dictates - a set of dictates and explications that are understood to be both fluid, not necessarily accurate, yet still both better than any suggestion from a citizen, while also being something which should never be questioned.
+
+To even doub or hesitate complete submission to the states dictates is seen and treated as malice towards every other citizen; this is something for which no patience, tolerance or consideration is to be afforded. In fact, those who engage in such repugnant behaviour are to be disenfranchised and described as destined for death as a form of capital punishment not by state, but by nature itself.
+
+Nature, as we have seen described in elucidations and analyses of modern instances of collectivist religions, is something which is denied in the sense of it producing anything of its own accord, but the same does not hold for destruction, erasure and negation. That is, it is the ultimate
+
+Nature, as we have seen described in elucidations and analyses of all the modern instances of collectivist religions, is something which is denied in the senes of it producing anything of its own accord (this is expressed to different degrees, but it is ultimately that our activity is either, at one extreme, that our activity is responsible for it in its totality, or that our activity is such that nature itself is overcome or overridden), but the same does not hold for destruction, erasure and negation. That is, it is the ultimate dialectical synthesis for a natural order that is to be replaced by the impetus and capacity for Man's creation of reality.
+
+The consequence of this is that there is no requirement to yield a specified structure representing some endpoint. Instead, the negation process makes clear that something has been decried as immaterial.
+
+# Feminism is Extremely Effective
+Social constructivism; necessarily has to become anti sex-essentialist, rendering the gender critical feminism's contingent ineffectual and receiving it, though ingenuously (only because biology is either real, or it is not the most universally reasonable means of describing life on earth that we can agree on), as reactionary and seeking to conserve, which, whether you agree or not, is something woke will posit as anti-progressive and right wing.
+
+From a purely logical standpoint, that has to be true in all cases except through insistence on an understood biological reality
+
+The crux of this is that if criticism of Patriarchy includes the insistence that sex essentialism, which is biology, is used to oppress, then the logical endpoint is Queer Theory. It becomes nearly impossible to differentiate properly between biology as oppression, misuse of biology as oppression, and bad biology/incorrect biology as oppression, because the discourse will take place in forums of the subject which sublate it, or ones which claim to be marginal to the milieu in which they contend the subject is able to breathe itself through the social fabric.
+
+Again, we must touch on the statement "You are not born a woman, but become". This clearly Hegelian statement follows the same logic of seekign to transform in order to self-beget. It already was the case that the woman should reject any notion of what it might mean to be a woman, even if she agrees that there is a biological reality, or that women have a body which specifically differs from that of a man. But Queer Theory took the same idea and made sure to apply it quite specifically to the body -> especially that of the woman.
+
+Once you name the Patriarchy as your sworn enemy, this must become a mystical movement which can never be satisfied. With other more vulgar domains of thought, an identified enemy, whether through malice or false consciousness, can be destroyed as a materially discernible entity. But the purpose of Patriarchy will remain until such time as feminism is no longer viable (Double negation).
+
+## Hope
+There was but one mild glimmer of hope that a feminist could, upon seeing how her own philosophy would be used against her, come to lose interest in holding to the tactics of Activism that rely on it.
+
+Who is ready to move past the solace, comfort and assurance that a group provides? That might be perfectly alone, but they have the sense that in the great plight of it all, there exists comrades in arms who are resonating at a compatible frequency and that, together, they are creating, or at least acknowledging, the true reality.
+
+It's not that far-fetched as humans come to match temporal cycles in other regards, including even facial expressions and body language. So what are these other dimensions of human existence which might synchronize and influence one another accordingly? Does the fact of women synchronizing menstrual cycles speak to our ability to have faith in changing the world in ways which don't need to be understood? Could we imagine that we create the perfect human by having similar faith? How about, that it is worth suppressing and repressing humanity on its journey towards that end?
+
+# Patience for the Intolerant
+April 29, 2023
+
+Remember that only one side of the simulated dichotomy was wishing to make intolerance an explicit modus operandi for their formulation of progress, and that the implication of disagreeing with this idea comes at the cost, as per the evaluations inherent to that dichotomy, one into someone who tolerates Nazis and is then, by extension, smoeone who keeps the company of Nazis -> this is, as we've seen through smears predicated on representing groups as Nazis based on even allegations of the presence of, not even particular people, but even just an artifact of any kind.
+
+The proposition is then, of course, to become a foot soldier for their causes as well as also to have you acknowledge their right to define the meanings of terms like Nazi and tolerance, as well as complete control over what can and cannot be tolerated sans discussion.
+
+The question must immediately be turned back around:
+- Do we tolerate such antagonistic, bad faith and violent actors, or do we find a new way of making the intraction as fruitful as possible for all involved?
+  - How so?
+    - It is not necessarily the case that the degree fruitfulness can be measured insofar that everyone feels their proposition is reinforced
+    - Would it not eventually lead to a world where understanding can be achieved without force?
+
+## Social Sentinel
+*aka Woke Sentinel**
+- Seeks out those that threaten proliferation of ideology (to impede proliferation of the woke ideology) and attempts to tag them as not being worth listening. They don't offer anything intelligent or genuine nor can they commit to anything beyond smearing the perceived threat (which is actually a process of dialectical negation through replacing that thing permanently with its opposite).
+
+# Mystified Materialism
+July 5, 2023
+
+## Fundamental
+All negative theology-based mysticism
+- Control the Structure of Being universally by removing the mundant property/component so that the true reality can be made visible
+- Marxism:
+  - Division of Labour
+  - Control of the means of production
+  - Claim to science since it is atheistic, and since it seeks to declare an organized understanding of some phenomenon
+  - Replaces God by being one portion of the God Head
+
+## Details
+We come easily to the mystified belief in that concepts, rather than expressing or bearing characteristics which can be evaluated against principles instead become something through which an expectation can be made for principles after the process is complete. If one is mystified, then they cannot rely on principles, as these now are also mystified (or the understanding of them is mystified).
+
+Wondering as to how one could have ever had stated principles that one might now have to question:
+- This leads to more mystification and a greater sense of disappointment
+- An even greater impetus to engage into nihilism and frustration with society or the world itself
+
+## Replacement
+Mystification becomes the replacement/suppplantation for any sense of principle except the one principle binding the cult; that is, allegiance to the cult of acknowledging the cult's stated purpose/reason for having any intentional moment. We refer to it as completely abstract and implicit as the cultists wish to declare that they are other to an oppressor who must be beaten and transcended over. In fact, it is an oppressor that can only be beaten through transcendence, or by act of transcendence.
+
+# Feeding Crocodiles
+## Conceptions of this
+**Normies or mild initiates**
+- Cowards who just comply to any social pressure
+- People who always seek to align with structural foce in order to:
+  - maintain or acquire social privilege
+  - wield power sanctimoniously
+## Enthused Initiates and True Believers
+**Sliding scale of these, mostly as can be functionally/pragmatically ascertained**
+### True Believers
+- Seeking the means to control reality
+- Strong desire to force their views on others
+  - Makes their perspective / belief true when unchallenged by others
+  - taking a position bound to threat of force is an easy way to establish that one has correct beliefs
+### Distraughtly Gnostic
+- Sees possibility that reality can change
+- Make fantasy reality - syntheses:
+  - Synthesis of racism
+    - Racism to transcend racism, then unreal can transcend to become better real
+### Double Negation thinking/enablement
+- Practice of acting or behaving or believing that which one expects will change
+- Keep doing what you want (even if problematic):
+  - Assumption that it presents as a virtue
+  - It will be negated at a later time
+- Motivations:
+  - Libido Dominandi
+  - Permit the play of the mind
+  - Self-loathing
+  - Puritanical cleansing
+  - Making one compatible with what one perceives as structural forces, especially ephemeral ones
+
+# The Dance of Cringe
+September 9, 2023
+Musical chairs of legitimate/competent and the bitter self-disenfranchised (more than just bitter, they have an aspiration to condemn as an assurance that they are in the right and that they aren't responsible for or accountable to any aspect of their circumstance for which they feel discontent or dissatisfied, leading to resentment and animosity)
+
+So, then, the resentment is itself the fuel for the will to power with an assumption or at least a suspicion that one would believe they might not have felt similary had they already have come upon the placement so desired. But how would one have come upon it, otherwise? Without brute force and without this ideological excuse of competence that they now scoff at?
+
+Well, though we say their desire is for an arbitrary power, what would be the story they instead tell themselves? Certainly, they would see it as a form of competence as well, but competence in what?
+- Awareness of what things to refuse and destroy
+- Desire to leave the current state of affairs
+- Desire to express their resentment and disdain wihch, when spoken from the position desired, would grant others the same desire, confirming it as real, and unleashing a great power that would rid the world of those very things they know must be destroyed -> elimination of evil, or the source of its illusions and the mundane.
+
+## Mundane
+What is mundane? The aspects and portions of the world that are, to begin with, not interesting to them but are, more importantly, causing others to become occupied become occupied with, to be infected with the mundane, when they would otherwise have come to hear and understand those things necessary to come into alignment with the subject - the resenter - leading to actualization of the correspondence of truth that would satisfy the sages, the rabbl and all the naysayers. Control the mundane and choose what being is to be reflected.
+
+# Comprehensive Warrior
+*Needs more work*
+
+# Blasting deBlasio
+September 13, 2023
+
+Looking back to deBlasio comparing lockdown victims whom he had punished for breaking orders (and who are punished regardless, and vulnerable to the imposed regulations due to their profession, skillset, choice of vocation and choice of investment), it brings about a foul taste in one's mouth and causes one to suspect they must prepare for the worst.
+
+To be frank, he is implying that any random person, regardless of tehir experience or choice of vocation, is dealing with grief and mental issues which surpass the issues of any private business owner.
+
+Infinite Regress:
+- Biological exposure
+- Biological feasibility
+- Any lasting characteristic from pre-modern or pre-society
+- Do we need to understand our own histories?
+
+# Remembrance
+Yes, we remember, but is it just to feed bitterness? Surely the first thought is that thinking of it at all would breed some resentment and make one more stubbornly resistant against differences of opinion.
+
+But, we were never permitted to express differences of opiion, because we were made to be inconsequential advocates, nullified and made inhert insofar as being able to affect the world for anything we believe to be of value, save one small exception
+
+We were declared as being the detriment of all mankind. The real virus who, worse than the mere limiting factor, were the source, the switch, the predicate which enabled the terror and misery for humanity as a whole.
+
+So, no, it wasn't mere difference of opinion, as we became uncertain of our very survival in this structure whose powers all seemed to content to feed to whatever point it might reach. And if nothing was learned from before, then we expect even lesser chances to make it through further iterations of similar kind.
+
+# Truth
+The truth is that, rather than understanding any of the issues, the different perspectives about them, the points of contention, and the possible paths to bring about the most resolute and universally viable outcome, many have predicated their position and opinion on the assumption that only one manner of thinking and being will be supported by the regime, and that the regime will be willing to escalate its use of force to impose this as time goes on.
+
+They are, essentially, choosing whether or not to be vocally supportive of the regime, supportive of condemning those who dissent, and manner in which one cultivates rationale about the aforementioned after having accepted the regime's supremacy.
+
+And we know why they do this:
+- Fear
+- Greed
+- Pride
+
+# Aempathy
+October 4, 2023
+
+Mendacious mendacity. Foaming at the mouth with endless aempathy.
+
+Yes, Aempathy. You can't help but say it funny, with its snarky, eccentric, flamboyant, presumptive, mocking, pretentious, exuberant, inauthentic, dismissive, condescending, sanctimonious, aberrant, sarcastic, menacing, ridiculing, agitating, petulant, pedantic, insidious, outrageous, self-assured, pompous, showy, arrogant, grandiose, inflated, haughty, ostentatious, exaggerated, extravagant, threatrical, tasteless and overbearingly inauthentic flavour.
+
+And, because of this flavour, because of the sentiment which surrounds it, because of the unmistakeably dubious forms of propositions which come along with it, you will be accused of having made your assertion for no reason other than your having been motivated by the very sentiments it produces.
+
+You are too haughty and can't tolerate even considering the pronouncement exclaiming itself as being in the name of empathy. For you, it is a personal attack and you see the fact of an attack as itself being a form of apathy/lack of empathy. You predicate your determination of empathy on whether someone holds you with prime consideration. This is, in veritability and in effect, evidence of your selfishness. When, truly, what it should be is an evaluation based on whether we are considering and able to understand how others who are affected/involved, would be feeling.
+
+Response:
+```
+Don't you mean "should" be feeling? Could? Or might be expected to be feeling? How could you ever be certain as to what another is feeling, even if they were to describe it to you in great detail? Why even require your perception and position to assume something so brittle and subjective? To even invoke empathy as a percept to your position is itself a haughty little manipulation as not only does it demand that your assertion be accepted on the basis fo something unprovable, but it concomitantly implies that those who disagree with your perception do so because of a lack of empathy.
+
+A truly empathetic position is one where you never need to compel another to your view in the name of empathy. Why? Because to be empathetic, in any sort of authentic form, would require you to experience another's perception so clearly that you would feel their precise emotive and embodied state. In its ideal form, you would feel exactly what they feel.
+```
+
+Barring such an ideal which, with no demonstrative capacity, should be treated as unattainable, at least in a scientifically provable manner, we must move towards a standard of empathy which forms its own axiomatic standards around the principles of the ideal model:
+
+- to assume that we could have the same perception about something in this world, or;
+- to assume that if it could be the case that it would be a good thing
+- to assume that, though we are separate people, the achievement of one person's goals is not necessarily the exclusion fo the other person's goals
+
+In employing such a standard, one might come to realize that assuming one is not empathetic for failure to agree is not supported by evidence, regardless of the position being argued, whereas the expressing that one is without empathy is itself evidence that one is not empathetic. This is another reason for us to call false empathy aempathy. It is not presumptive or menacing, for we would not speak of it or write and think of it except as a defense against dialectical attacks, which necessitates a more complex understanding
+
+# New Woke
+Covidism is the new woke because it puts even non-devout covidists into the wizard's circle and keeps them doing the work predicated on the logic of a covidist world:
+- nature is harmonious without the division of labour/property
+- adaptation is non-consensual
+- placed in the circumstance of ideology -> robbed of true nature
+  - nature returns through the collective
+  - all must do the work of bringing the conditions for a harmonius nature after the threats are overcome by eliminating motividowel
+
+Man who has false consciousness, by eliminating indiidual man who has false consciousness at best, and is actually trying to worsen the trip of ideology/domination due to KM's bourgeois indoctrination