|
|
@@ -79,4 +79,22 @@ Dressing and presenting as caricatures of the opposite sex, particularly men as
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strangely, some figures whom I have admired actually fall for the absurd suggestion that Drag Queens aren't always sexual, or that some might even be asexual. I am not even sure how this idea got started, but he referenced a TV program as being boring, banal and political.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-At the margin, what is an asexual sexually reproducing species? It is almost like a protest against being. Someone finds either the proposition of life completely untenable, or they find the social aspects of society to have been so distasteful and horrid that they are explicitly focused on making this sexual grievance a centerpiece of their identity. Sex, as it was, was a distasteful proposition and they will live in a way which makes existence unfeasible for humanity. Whether that is void of sex is ridiculous as the entire context is based on male/female sexual relations.
|
|
|
+At the margin, what is an asexual sexually reproducing species? It is almost like a protest against being. Someone finds either the proposition of life completely untenable, or they find the social aspects of society to have been so distasteful and horrid that they are explicitly focused on making this sexual grievance a centerpiece of their identity. Sex, as it was, was a distasteful proposition and they will live in a way which makes existence unfeasible for humanity. Whether that is void of sex is ridiculous as the entire context is based on male/female sexual relations.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# But We Aren't Right Wing
|
|
|
+Yes, anything that is not Che becomes right-wing. Any structure, any specification, any static definition. But of course, the mind which insists as such is perpetually fixated on the evaluation of every prospective participant, and evaluating them as revolutionaries or dead mess to be cleared from the page of time to make way for a supposed New Sensibility.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+That is itself a process which insists that there can be but one kind of society and one kind of citizen. A citizen who does not produce any distortion or disharmony when placed before my conception, my realization.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+And this is why they love children. A revolutionary force by nature, they will rebel against their family and all of society even before I make a modest suggestion.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+But to truly prove you are not "Right-Wing" is to simply be open. Accept no demand to conform, and reject the desire to rationalize tyranny. Have no angst about letting your vulnerable parts be exposed, or to realize that one cannot expect all resources to be made available or to be accounted for at any given time.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# The Right to Vanity
|
|
|
+Imagine, for a moment, that you take the identity which culture told you you cannot apply to yourself, and then think about all the characteristics that are associated with it. Then, think on how those characteristics might be ones which you believed could apply to you, but realize that the association between them and your non-identity (forbidden identity) causes an implicit assumption that those characteristics apply more strongly to the non-identity than to you. Now, imagine that you are rejected by that identity, and that you perceived that identity as being believed to be superior to you because it has a more desirable set of more strongly-weighted characteristics.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+How unfair, no? What did you do to deserve this? You were simply made inadequate, per the essentialist lense.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Finally, imagine that you redefine the path to association with that identity, proclaim your association and then acquire its characteristics. Now, entertain the idea that you express those characteristics exceptionally well and that it is a moral good and even an ethical duty to claim that identity. You feel that you have new rationales and you, in a sense, have taken revenge on the non-identity as well as life and reality itself. In fact, by moving the standard of reality, you yield universal emancipation to all things.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Unfortunately, it is one's quest to believe they are unique which comes to dods with their need to claim an identity, any identity, that is recognizable. For even though a story might be told of one discovering their unique place and form, it is a story that has always already been told and the ability to believe the story can take hold and be relevant only insofar that it is communicable. In having to be told, the identity within the story must be understandable by those with whom it is shared, and it is only understood when the listener can imagine themselves as embodying that identity or by recognizing that it is something for which an association in the world already exists. This composition has already been written, the song already played. How to be unique an dalso have a form and set of thoughts which anyone believes to be their own?
|
logicp