latest

Book/Manuscript.md

@@ -2095,7 +2095,7 @@ Ultimately, only the promise to address all effects, and thus the oppression mod
 
 Though the collectivist disposition among humans goes back to the advent of the human form, Marxism is the best specification of its essence in modern times. It formalizes the plight of human personhood against the constraints of existence, impels one to recruit others to reinforce belief in delusion, and yield a cult which insists on initiation and participation to prove one humanity. 
 
-Only a handful of people have said that covidism is an instance of Marxism, and those who push back on the idea at its utterance aren't just Covidists themselves, but even romanticizing Marxists who stood against Covid tyranny. I contend it follows Marx core reasoning for man as Social Man and his explications of the means of effecting gnostic escape.
+Only a handful of people have said that covidism is an instance of Marxism, and those who push back on the idea at its utterance aren't just Covidists themselves, but even romanticizing Marxists who stood against Covid tyranny. I contend it follows Marx's core reasoning for man as Social Man and his explications of the means of effecting gnostic escape.
 
 Bourgeois property as cause of human estrangement still remains, but broadens to all factors affecting disparate conditions of health. All risk serves as concrete example making previous warnings of grave consequences for group behaviour appear remarkably prescient, with media and academics stating that "Covid" was a horrible, once-in-a-lifetime ordeal, yet only a taste of the horrors to come.
 
@@ -2152,8 +2152,8 @@ Georg Lukács might offer some insight into how collectivists feel about the err
 
 > "proletariat always aspires towards the truth even in its ‘false’ consciousness and in its substantive errors." - Georg Lukács (History and Class Consciousness)
 
-Belief in the validity of health as an individual is a form of false consciousness, much in the way that a Marxist views false consciousness as excusing the material conditions of bourgeois society. Covidism always asserts that those who do not conform to the new collective with a totalized vision of society are doing so because of ideology, which can be enumerated in various forms ranging from "Far-Right fitness culture", to "toxic masculinity", to capitalism, and many more.
-!TODO: Here!!!!!!!!!
+Belief in the validity of pursuing health as an individual is a form of false consciousness, much in the way that a Marxist views false consciousness as excusing the material conditions of bourgeois society. Covidism always asserts that those who do not conform to the new collective with a totalized vision of society are doing so because of ideology, invoked through labels like "Far-Right fitness culture", "toxic masculinity", and capitalism.
+
 > "Ideology is a system of concepts and views which serves to make sense of the world while obscuring the social interests that are expressed therein, and by its completeness and relative internal consistency tends to form a closed system and maintain itself in the face of contradictory or inconsistent experience.
 ...
 Marxists seek to subject all ideology to critique, uncovering the internal contradictions in an ideology and exposing the social interests expressed by it."
@@ -2162,181 +2162,185 @@ Marxists seek to subject all ideology to critique, uncovering the internal contr
 
 > "However, such a development of Marxism is contrary to its spirit which is relentlessly critical and self-critical and draws sustenance from the unceasing creation of new material for reflection in the progress of culture and social life." - Marxists.org (https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/i/d.htm#ideology)
 
-As seen before, for a collectivist, their worldview and that of those whom they put forward as congruent to their cause are simply utilizing reason to make sense of the world, and those who are not agreeing to their observations, analyses, objectives and prescriptions are participating in and succumbing to Ideology.
+As seen before, the collectivist worldview and that of those congruent to them simply utilize reason to make sense of the world, and those not agreeing to their observations, analyses, objectives and prescriptions are succumbing to Ideology.
 
 #### No Health Except Communism
 
-As the concept of health has transformed through Critical Praxis to mean a state of affairs void of oppression, then epitome of health is conceived of as a state of equity wherein no social tension is produced from the relations of humans. This has a few consequences, one of which being that inclusivity, which is the championing of those whose bodies are superficially described by the collectivist mythologies, are the model by which an environment is evaluated as per health. Since the theory produces the model which represents those it asserts as being assigned to those categories, the apparatus of Public Health has full capacity to enforce its ideal prescriptions for all humans based on those mythologies. 
+The concept of health transformed through Critical Praxis means a state of affairs void of oppression. The epitome of this health is state of equity wherein no social tension is produced, as indicated by racism as a public health emergency. This has a few consequences, one of which being that inclusivity, which is the championing of those whose bodies are superficially described by the collectivist mythologies, is the model by which an environment is evaluated for health. Since the theory produces a model which represents those it asserts as being assigned to its categories, the apparatus of Public Health has full capacity to enforce its ideal prescriptions for all humans. 
 
-Another consequence, as a corollary of the demotion of individual health, is the framing that those who champion fitness improvement, as per the actions and behaviours that can be undertaken by individuals, is seen as the appearance of Fascist ideology. This was evident in the failure of public health officials to remind the public to improve their physical health, the further failure of public health officials to not acknowledge that fitness levels should affect outcomes with any respiratory disease, and the prevalent association of the right wing with fitness culture, according to mainstream media sources, at relevant time points of the covid era, such as [this article](https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/pandemic-fitness-trends-have-gone-extreme-literally-n1292463).
+Another consequence, as a corollary of the demotion of individual health, is the framing that those who champion improved fitness as actions and behaviours undertaken individually, is seen as the appearance of Fascist ideology. This was evident in the failure of public health officials to remind the public to improve their physical health, the further failure of public health officials to not acknowledge that fitness levels affect outcomes with any respiratory disease, and the prevalent association of the right wing with fitness culture, according to mainstream media, at relevant time points of the covid era, such as [this article](https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/pandemic-fitness-trends-have-gone-extreme-literally-n1292463).
 
 ### Dialectic of the Natural
 
-They want to have it both ways by saying that natural immunity does not exist but that the immunity which thy can confer upon you will occur precisely because of your capacity to naturally adapt immunologically to the stimuli of your environment, with this being a "controlled" introduction of the precise stimulus to which you are supposed to adapt to in order to attain the maximum benefit both for yourself and for your community. That those with a collectivist mindset ran with the notion that natural immunity could not be undertaken for so long, not simply on the basis that it wasn't preferable, but even by insisting that persons who experience a real infection to Satan's particles would not confer immunity, due to a variety of proposed mechanisms, such as the ratio of non-specific antibodies after an infection, binding affinity, the rate at which the receptor binding domain of the spike protein could mutate, glycan shielding, conformational flexibility, the infection causing an inflammatory response with non-ideal proportions of particular inflammatory markers, inadequate germinal center formation, suppression of interferon signaling, and so on. It boggles the mind that the logical conclusion of many of these arguments is that people would not be able to clear the infection, but was an absurd thing to suggest as an inability to clear the infection would mean eventual death.
+Public health advocates largely wanted to have it both ways by saying natural immunity doesn't exist but immunization can occur precisely because of a capacity to naturally adapt immunologically. A "controlled" exposure to the precise stimulus yields a natural adaptation to attain the maximum benefit both for yourself and for your community. Those of a collectivist mindset ran for far too long with the notion that natural immunity could not be undertaken not simply on the basis that it wasn't preferable but by insisting that persons who experience a real infection would not confer immunity. This was due to a variety of proposed mechanisms, such as the ratio of non-specific antibodies after an infection, binding affinity, the rate at which the receptor binding domain of the spike protein could mutate, glycan shielding, conformational flexibility, the infection causing an inflammatory response with non-ideal proportions of particular inflammatory markers, inadequate germinal center formation, suppression of interferon signaling, and so on. It boggles the mind that this conclusion was reached by so many, without grappling with the reality that the vast majority clear the infection, and that long term immunity is not solely dependent on IgG antibodies.
 
 Since quite some time, now, it's been obvious that people do, in fact, recover from infection and though many like to argue as to whether one form of immunological adaptation is superior to the other, most partially-sensible medical professionals and scientists have conceded that natural immunity is indeed a thing and actually quite robust. Nevertheless, we should still analyze a bit more this blurring of concepts which were thrown upon the entire world wherein they were gaslit into denying the notion that they could benefit from natural immunity while also being told that the design of the jabs and one's ability to respond to it were all based on one's capacity to enjoy natural immunity. In particular, this was expressed through claiming that there is nothing artificial about the jabs or one's reaction to them and that, in fact, they were much safer and more natural than previous vaccine designs, which included metal-based adjuvants and biological particulate.
 
 Collectivist public health advocates also claimed that there was nothing natural about being infected by a virus, as though it weren't something that were technically occurring all the time, and which wasn't part an integral part of our ecological reality and the mechanism of evolution which has created and guided our development as a species on this planet. That somehow the adaptation we would incur by being exposed to something through the progression of barriers by which we are designed through evolution to deal with the biodiversity of the environment is something unnatural, but the presentation of antigen through mechanisms which would never have occurred in the natural world except as an effect of human industrial development was itself something more natural or less unnatural.
 
-The effect of all this has been to mystify people as to their expectations about their safety under completely normal circumstances, such as when being outdoors with good air, good weather, and without a single ill person in their midst. In these normal situations where they might otherwise benefit from touching grass, reducing stress, enhancing their vitality and being creative by whistling a tune, man now found themselves tasting their own mucus and saliva as they continuously rebreathe their bodily fluids which become aerosolized from the ever-moistening mask they keep on their faces for far too long, in circumstances for which it was never intended, and in a manner which habituates them to maintaining a more anonymous representation of themselves both to the public, and even to themselves. To look out into the world with the expectation that one cannot be easily identified while thinking that every possible location in the parts of the universe they are likely to traverse is a threat to their life, health and well-being is now somehow a natural way of being.
+The effect of this has been to mystify people's expectations about safety under completely normal circumstances, such as when being outdoors with good air, good weather, and without a single ill person in their midst. In these normal situations where they might otherwise benefit from touching grass, enhancing vitality and whistling a tune, many were now tasting their mucus and saliva as they continuously rebreathe bodily fluids becoming aerosolized from the ever-moistening mask kept far too long on their faces, in circumstances beyond intended purpose, and in a manner which habituating maintenance of an anonymous representation of themselves to the public and to themselves. To look out into the world with the expectation that one cannot be easily identified while thinking that every possible location traversed is threatening to health and well-being is now somehow a natural way of being.
 
 ### The Dialectic of Togetherness
 
-This one was especially treacherous and seems to have had an effect which remains to this day. We had to be apart in order to be together for if we were apart when it was necessary we could come to be together on a higher level than before. In putting aside our selfishness and taking the step to be apart now, we transcend our previous shortcomings which contribute to the atomization of man and society and demonstrate capacity and willingness to achieve unity in a way which preserves and prolongs the lives of others. Instead of being separate and atomized, we are coming together and prioritizing the health of all people as a whole.
+An especially treacherous synthesis the effect of which remains today. We had to be apart in order to be together; if we were apart when it was necessary we could come to be together on a higher level than before. In putting aside selfishness and taking the step to be apart, we transcend previous shortcomings which contribute to atomization of man and society and demonstrate capacity and willingness to achieve unity in a way which preserves and prolongs the lives of others. Instead of being separate and atomized, we come together and prioritize the health of all people as a whole.
 
-Through this process of becoming physically separate but consciously aligned, we achieve new understanding and appreciation for how precious it is to be together while we'll each have contributed to transforming the conditions to make togetherness possible again. Not to mention, absence makes the heart grow fonder!
+Through a process of becoming physically separate but consciously aligned, we achieve new understanding and appreciation for how precious it is to be together while each contributing to transforming the conditions to make togetherness possible again. Not to mention, absence makes the heart grow fonder!
 
 By being apart, we show that we care about each other's well-being and that we understand the historical process of achieving what is necessary for the benefit of one another.
 
-The pandemic is a challenge for us as a species, and our ability to erect the hope of an improved form of togetherness rests on our ability to prove authenticity to ourselves and each other, which makes the project of a great vision for humanity possible. In being separate, we are actually behaving, perceiving and feeling the essence of togetherness, as opposed to allowing us to return to selfish desires which keep us from connecting with one another.
+The pandemic is a challenge for us as a species. Our ability to erect the hope of an improved form of togetherness rests on our ability to prove authenticity to ourselves and each other, which makes the great vision of humanity possible. In being separate, we are actually behaving, perceiving and feeling the essence of togetherness, as opposed to allowing us to return to selfish desires which keep us from connecting with one another.
 
-In quelling our immediate wants and coming to understand that everyone's success, including our own, is potentiated through the greater collective, we set an example of empathy and embody it in our very actions, making us more symbiotically compatible and resilient against the dangers of this world. What seems like a sacrifice as an individual is actually a blessing to each of us.
+In quelling our immediate wants and coming to understand that everyone's success, including our own, is potentiated through the greater collective, we set an example of empathy and embody it in our very actions, making us symbiotically compatible and resilient against the dangers of this world. What seems like a sacrifice as an individual is actually a blessing to each of us.
 
-Conversely, seeing one another during this high risk period will have the opposing effect. In choosing to risk one another's health by coming into close contact when it's not yet safe to do so, we find ourselves ignoring the risks of the situation and pretending to enjoy one another's company while fostering cognitive dissonance which disrupts the flow and precludes us from having the fulfilling interactions we truly need. Being together when it's harmful while being aware of the danger reinforces the practice of selfishness, isolates us and makes us unsympathetic to the real needs of our fellow humans.
+Conversely, seeing one another during high risk periods has the opposing effect. In choosing to risk one another's health through contact when it's not yet safe to do so, we ignore the risks of the situation and pretend to enjoy one another's company while fostering cognitive dissonance which disrupts the flow and precludes us from having the fulfilling interactions we truly need. Being together when it's harmful while being aware of the danger reinforces the practice of selfishness, isolates us and makes us unsympathetic to the real needs of our fellow humans.
 
-After having gone through a great intellectual, physical, and even spiritual challenge, we'll transcend the limitations which had rendered us so dull, callous and prone to bringing catastrophe upon ourselves and overcome the atomization of our technologically-preoccupied lives.
+After having gone through a great intellectual, physical, and even spiritual challenge, we'll transcend limitations that render us so dull, callous and prone to bringing catastrophe upon ourselves and overcome the atomization of our technologically-preoccupied lives.
 
 #### Our History Coming Together
 
 !WARNING: There may be some repetition here
 
-We are not truly together unless we are apart. That is something which can be understood in a number of ways. Ultimately, it means that we must show our love for whomsoever we claim to care about by doing those things which demonstrate true togetherness -> that is, things that are good for the public, society and humanity.
+That we're not truly together unless we're apart can be understood in a number of ways. Ultimately, we must show our love for whomsoever we claim to care about by demonstrating true togetherness. This is a politically-mediated sensibility upheld by rhetoric assuming what's good for the public, society and humanity.
 
-This also means that having preferred social bonds for inner nuclear family members or closer friends and prioritizing them and our relations to them (at least, in any manner which can be construed as deleterious or detrimental to public health) is not expressing togetherness or demonstrating that we truly care about anyone. We are simply upholding ideology, being reactionary, acting on our irrational fears, and being a puppet for interests who believe they can maintain their advantages in society by not falling in line with public health perspective and its prioritization of our collective well-being.
+This also means that having preferred social bonds for inner nuclear family or closer friends and prioritizing them and our relations to them (at least, in any manner which can be construed as deleterious or detrimental to public health) is not expressing togetherness or that we truly care about anyone. We are simply upholding ideology, being reactionary, acting on our irrational fears, and being a puppet for interests who believe they can maintain their advantages in society by not falling in line with public health perspective and its prioritization of our collective well-being.
 
-This event is historical as well. It is preceded by the events informing and leading to it, and it also leads towards a future that is now informed by it.
+A historical event in the eyes of those doing Critical praxis, it's easily represented as historical to the non-initiated on the simple basis of it being preceded by events leading to it, and the view that the future is informed by it.
 
-More specifically, however, the transformation of us all towards something embodying courage and desire is historically informed by whatever is correctly prescient or at the cusp of change. Those things which denote the moments of change somehow keep their symbolic relevance politically, but also as a feature in the structure of reality such that its content and determinative factors must be resolved and accounted for as part of historical progress. This is why so many supposed non-believers, academics or elites are so compatible with the idea that either something has to be eliminated or used in such a way as to be what appears as only a superficial or aesthetic consolidation in ritualistic social phenomena which are otherwise an unnecessary or destructive occurrence. There is no reason for angry youth to destroy cities and deface monuments of historical significance, but the elite find it amusing and mostly harmless.
+More specifically, however, our shared transformation through courage and desire is historically informed by the prescient at the cusp of change. Those things which denote the moments of change keep politically symbolic relevance and function as a feature in the structure of reality such that their content and determinative factors are accounted for in the resolving nature of historical progress. This is why so many supposed non-believers, academics or elites are compatible with the idea that something has to be eliminated or used as a superficial, aesthetic consolidation of social ritual. That is, they tolerate phenomena which are otherwise an unnecessary or destructive occurrence. There is no reason for angry youth to destroy cities and deface monuments of historical significance, with the targets sometimes ill-chosen. Elites and intellectuals find it nevertheless amusing and mostly harmless as baseline, and reframe it as necessary when their commitment to revolution becomes more explicit.
 
-If, for them, they intuit an imminentization without believing that it is something conceived and constructed or constructible from mind as things are already in the present, then it is something to be released from a reordered structure. But, then, if the current structure doesn't permit that because of the addition of undesirable aspects / details / phenomena which effectively pollute the structure as it currently exists, then a practice of purification has to take place, and this only makes sense asaa process of destruction and replacement.
+If they intuit imminentization without believing it constructible from mind as things presently are, then it is something to be released from a reordered structure. But, then, if the current structure doesn't permit that because of the addition of undesirable phenomena which pollute the structure as it currently exists, then a practice of purification has to take place, and this only makes sense as a process of destruction and replacement.
 
-So, then, in order for there to be some evidence of progress of history, the particular aesthetic of the zeitgeist in current event bearing conflict, is seen as itself a fundamental aspect of the progression of humanity, even if it interferes with some previously-stated principle, it itself becomes an essential principle which supersedes the principle with which it conflicts, and any resulting disruption of logic, presentation of hypocrisy, or failure to cohere at some level of analysis can be disregarded on the basis of a proposition that the conflict is itself an incomplete procedure of intellectual refinement and that the very fact of one accepting, supporting, or executing the act of negating the targeted problematic aspect is itself the intellectual refinement in action.
+Then, in order for there to be evidence of historical progress, the aesthetic of the zeitgeist in current event bearing conflict is seen as a fundamental aspect of the progression of humanity, even if it interferes with previous principles. It becomes an essential principle superseding the principle with which it conflicts, and any resulting disruption of logic, presentation of hypocrisy, or failure to cohere at can be disregarded on the basis of proposing the conflict the incomplete procedure of intellectual refinement and that the very fact of supporting and executing negation of the problematic aspect is itself the intellectual refinement in action.
 
-This is, in essence, a very low bar of entry towards a supposed intellectual achievement, but any shame, dissatisfaction or vulnerability one might normally stumble into as a consequence of this is supplanted by the sense of moral virtue one assumes through the sanitization and abolishment that has been indicated.
+This is a low bar of entry for supposed intellectual achievement but any shame, dissatisfaction or vulnerability stumbled into as a consequence of it is supplanted by a sense of moral virtue one assumes through the sanitization and abolishment that follows.
 
-It also, of course, goes without saying that a centrally acknowledged and socially supported process of sanitization is something complicated to reject and that attempting to reject it will necessarily incur the cost of grappling with the suggestion that one is rejecting morality, cleanliness, and higher intellectual expression. For these reasons, academics and political elite will always err on the side of the political initiative at play and infrequently demonstrate skepticism in response to the new propositions.
+It also goes without saying that a centrally acknowledged and socially supported process of sanitization is complicated to reject and doing so will necessarily incur the cost of grappling with the suggestion that one is rejecting morality, cleanliness, and higher intellectual expression. For these reasons, academics and political elite always err on the side of the political initiative at play and infrequently demonstrate skepticism in response to the new propositions.
 
 ### The Dialectic of Consent
 
 This is probably one of the most egregious manipulations on all humans as it attempts to directly redefine the ethics and morality of what right one has to their own barriers of privacy and autonomy concerning their own body.
 
-The very concept of consent and, as such, the sanctity, autonomy and sovereignty of one's own personhood is put into disarray by supposing that the default state of reality is one to which one cannot consent to. This is reminiscent of the thrownness that was referred to earlier.
+The very concept of consent and, as such, the sanctity and sovereignty of one's own personhood is put into disarray by supposing that the default state of reality is one to which one cannot consent. This is reminiscent of the thrownness referred to earlier.
 
-One cannot consent to the unknown, which is nature as it currently stands. This is particularly because it is not the correct nature, due to the tampering consequent to man's selfish needs. As such, nothing about the state of reality can be known until such time that science has completed its task, which is akin to a historical process completing the specification of man and world, man and nature which are, as Marx put it, one and the same but also in a configuration whereby man is not actually expressing his true nature until such time that the process which his to say man's ontological journey through history, is complete.
+One cannot consent to the unknown, which is nature as it currently stands. This is particularly so because it is not a correct nature, due to the tampering consequent to man's selfish needs. As such, nothing about the state of reality can be known until such time that science has completed its task, which is akin to a historical process completing the specification of man and world. We wait for man and nature which are, as Marx put it, one and the same but also in a configuration whereby man is not actually expressing his true nature until such time that the process, which is to say man's ontological journey through history, is complete.
 
-You were always given a choice to be a part of appropriately-assigned, institutionally-supported effort which is intelligently formulating the specification for the adaptation and as such you can consent to an intelligent solution for the problem that not only you're faced with but that you modulate as a problem for others through your actions. You were given consent because the knowledge you have the choice to receive is being guaranteed as the most intelligent option available, specifically-suited to your and everyone else's needs.
+You were given a choice to be a part of an appropriately-assigned, institutionally-supported effort intelligently formulating the specification for adaptation and as such you can consent to a smart, fully-explicated solution for the problem that not only you're faced with but that you modulate as a problem to others by your very actions. You were given consent through knowledge that you have the choice to receive what's guaranteed as the best option available suited to your and everyone else's needs.
 
 Since the dialectic involves a default state of nature to which one cannot consent, and a process of composing the intentional solution with specificity, any hesitancy or dragging of feet is portrayed as the denying of other people's consent.
 
-Not only that, but the state keeps the process of knowledge-construction and, by extension, consent, free of contamination by the elements that you are otherwise most susceptible to such that you would otherwise have the worst capacity for consent. In fact, the process of contaminating knowledge production is itself a phenomenon which is like a viral threat, demonstrating the multiple levels of complexity at which this issue is having to be dealt with. The whole ordeal of infectious disease is so complicated beyond even those areas of discourse that you are aware of that you would otherwise be completely overwhelmed with the complexity of it all. The state helps to fix the process of dialogue which otherwise eliminates opportunity for consent.
+Not only that, but the state keeps the process of knowledge-construction and, by extension, consent, free of contamination by elements you are otherwise susceptible to such that you would otherwise no capacity for consent. In fact, the process of contaminating knowledge production is itself a phenomenon like a viral threat, demonstrating the multiple levels of complexity at which this issue is having to be dealt with. The whole ordeal of infectious disease is so complicated beyond even those areas of discourse that you are aware of that you would otherwise be overwhelmed with the complexity of it all. The state helps to fix the process of dialogue which otherwise eliminates opportunity for consent.
 
-Of course, this is all hocus-pocus dialectical nonsense whereby your consent has been demolished through a specious and sophistic faculty of aufheben. Not only is your fundamental capacity for consent being overlooked, supplanted and destroyed, but the censorship, corrupt incentives and threats to professionals through totalizing entryism makes it so that even the information generated to be salient with the institutional narratives is itself corrupt and something which, when presented to you at face value, impossible to give intelligent and reasonable consent to.
+Of course, this is all hocus-pocus dialectical nonsense whereby your consent has been demolished through a specious and sophistic faculty of aufheben. Not only is your fundamental capacity for consent being overlooked, supplanted and destroyed, but the censorship, corrupt incentives and threats to professionals through totalizing entryism makes it so that even the information generated to be salient with the institutional narratives is itself corrupt and something which, when presented to you at face value, is impossible to reasonably give consent to.
 
 #### Eco-Socialist Spin on Consent
 
-Many of the previous generation who subscribed to the green "revolution" framed in a more Neo-Liberal formulation will see themselves as environmentalists and scientists built on naive realism extending from the lineage of naturalism who must now "undo" the mistakes of an overzealous form of industrial capitalism rabidly pursuing elite status through profit-motive. For them, their idea of a noble and pristine natural state of the environment is something which was corrupted by the selfish inclinations of their less green and less educated neighbours and, as such, their understanding about the conditions which can be consented to is that, just as they explain extreme weather conditions as all being the result of the fall of man, so too can the pathogens of the environment now be thought of in that way, including any and all common infection which runs the risk of inducing detrimental effects, even undetected, beyond that of any common respiratory illness we've been subjected to.
+Many of the previous generation who subscribed to a green "revolution" framed in Neo-Liberal formulation will see themselves as environmentalists and scientists built on a naive realism that extends from the lineage of naturalism. The Eco-Socialist must "undo" the mistakes of an overzealous industrial capitalism that rabidly pursues elite status through profit-motive. For them, their idea of a noble and pristine natural state of the environment is something which was corrupted by the selfish inclinations of their less green and less educated neighbours. As such, their understanding about the conditions which can be consented to is that, just as they explain any non-ideal weather as an extreme weather condition resulting from the fall of man, so too can the pathogens of the environment now be thought of similarly, including any and all common infection which runs the risk of inducing detrimental effects, even undetected or no worse than that of any common respiratory illness.
 
 ### Dialectic of Fascism
 
-To remember what the Dialectic is, especially in modern times, it's worth looking again at that quote by our seminal Critical Theorists, Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno:
+To remember what the Dialectic is, especially in modern times, it's worth looking again at that quote by our seminal Critical theorists, Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno:
 
 > "...dialectical thinking, in which each thing is what it is only by becoming what it is not." - Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno (Dialectic of Enlightenment)
 
-In the sense of Fascism it is being redefined both by the state and activists who are actively engaged in their disposition towards collectivism, as those things which are actually antithetical to Fascism (with Fascism being the concept put forward by Giovanni Gentile and Benito Mussolini, whose work "The Doctrine of Fascism" helps to explicate what everyone already has a sense of as being Fascism, but what can be more simply summarized with the following:
+If in our speculation the object in question is deemed to not adequately befit what it was believed to be, then it must transform through being placed against its opposite until the realization of their similarity redefines them.
+
+In the sense of Fascism it is being redefined both by the state and activists actively engaged in pursuit of collectivism. This occurs through a proclamation of things as Fascism which are otherwise antithetical to it, such as freedom and liberty.
+
+Note that Fascism is the concept put forward by Giovanni Gentile and Benito Mussolini, whose work "The Doctrine of Fascism" explicates what most already sense as being Fascism through the following:
 
 > "Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." - Benito Mussolini
 
-Indeed, the acts and aspirations of individual humans towards freedom and liberty are truly antithetical to Fascism, but such acts have come to be labeled by Fascism by the statists and collectivists of our time who are seeking to create a superstate through authoritarianism which promises to provide us with medical treatments en route to a situation where viral infections simply would no longer occur.
+Indeed, the acts and aspirations of individual humans towards freedom and liberty are truly antithetical to Fascism, but such acts have come to be labeled Fascism by statists and collectivists who are seeking to create a superstate through authoritarianism by promising to provide us with safety and medical treatments en route to a situation where viral infections simply do not occur.
 
-All resistance to the state is now labeled as "Fascism", while actual Fascism is synthesized with the superficial portrayal of freedom and liberation in a contrived sense whereby it is deemed that the conditions for freedom will be made possible through submission to the state and the relinquishing of one's desires for personal or individual liberty. Those who benefit from an empowered structure will label themselves as liberatory and congruent to equity, and those who criticize them for having facilitated the merger of private and public into an increasingly authoritarian state come to be labeled as Fascists. Fascists is now any resistance to the transformative progress of encroaching Totalitarianism.
+All resistance to the state is now labeled as "Fascism", while actual Fascism is synthesized with the superficial portrayal of freedom and liberation in a contrived sense whereby it is deemed that the conditions for freedom will be made possible through submission to the state and relinquishing one's desire for individual liberty. Those who benefit from an empowered structure will label themselves as liberatory and congruent to equity, and those who criticize them for having facilitated the merger of private and public into an increasingly authoritarian state come to be labeled as Fascists. Fascism is now any resistance to the transformative progress of encroaching Totalitarianism.
 
-The Freedom Convoy and those who advocated for freedom and liberty during the Covid era were denounced as being those who destroy freedom by inconveniencing through their protest, desire for dialogue (both with the state, which was never granted to them, or simply with any whomsoever wished to speak, dance, eat and play with them in their bouncy castles), as well as with their pestilence and unclean bodies which serve as vectors for disease and contamination, as was described by the state's supportive witnesses who claimed, without evidence, that the truckers who had come into Ottawa, Canada to protest were defecating on the streets.
+The Freedom Convoy and those who advocated for freedom and liberty during the Covid era were denounced as being those who destroy freedom by inconveniencing through their protest and desire for dialogue. Their request for dialogue, both with the state which was never granted to them and with whomsoever wished to speak, dance, eat and play with them in their bouncy castles, was portrayed as an intransigent, patriarchal demand to uphold their supremacy. They were depicted through media as imposing their pestilence and unclean bodies which serve as vectors for disease and contamination, with state-supporting witnesses coming forward in formal deliberations to claim, without further evidence, that the truckers defecating on the streets.
 
-A state who completely refused to communicate with protestors but instead stamped them out, literally, at gunpoint with the boots and hooves of its heavily armed and armoured security forces is the opposite of Fascism, while those who asked for nothing more than dialogue were the epitome of Fascism for daring to desire freedom and liberty. They were a horrible inconvenience and a stain on our otherwise pristine and beautiful nation state. An inconvenience that is completely the result of the vile conspiratorial villainy by these unwashed truckers, and was not in any way maximized by the government who intervened immediately as the truckers came into the city and instead of allowing them to set up camp in various parts of the city that were not necessarily going to block traffic, such as along the canal and in Confederation Park, had forced them to amass themselves in a concentrated permutation along the busiest streets of downtown Ottawa in a manner which would maximize the inconvenience to the city. Yes, these truckers were the embodiment of Fascism and were given their just desserts by the helmets and batons of freedom, courtesy of our magnanimously empathetic and generously charitable government.
+A state who completely refused to communicate with protestors but instead stamped them out at gunpoint with the boots and hooves of its heavily armed and armoured security forces is the opposite of Fascism, while those who asked for nothing more than an authentic exchange of human thought were the epitome of Fascism for daring to desire anything beyond the rigid contraints of state-directed conformity. They were a horrible inconvenience and a stain on our otherwise pristine and beautiful nation state. An inconvenience that is completely the result of the vile conspiratorial villainy of these unwashed truckers, and was not in any way maximized by the government who intervened immediately as the truckers came into the city. Instead of allowing them to settle in various parts of the city that were not necessarily going to block traffic, such as along the canal or in Confederation Park, authorities forced them to amass themselves as a concentrated permutation along the busiest streets of downtown Ottawa. It seemed like a design to maximize the inconvenience to the city. Yes, these truckers, the very embodiment of Fascism, were given their just desserts by the helmets and batons of freedom, courtesy of our magnanimously empathetic and generously charitable government.
 
 #### Freedom
 
 ##### Freedumb for the Freedumbers
 
-How did we get to the point of people actively mocking those who attempt to fight for something which, conceptually-speaking, applies to absolutely everyone? It would necessarily be the case that you would have something to fear. What might those fears be?
+No matter how evident it seems to be that humans have a natural disposition easily drawn to authoritarianism, I'm always get taken aback by fellow humans working to reduce liberty. How did we get to the point of people actively mocking fellow citizens who advocate on their behalf? Never on the basis of seeking truth, but through extinguishing a process of discovery in favour of structurally-imposed certainty.
 
 ##### Unfreedom
 
-There has definitely been plenty of narrative supplying a dialectical attack on freedom in the form of proclaiming that those who advocate for freedom are actually just destroying freedom and  chasing their selfish inclinations. But it goes a step further, in saying that they are the tip of the spear, so to speak.
+There's been ample narrative-supplied fodder for dialectical attacks on freedom through proclaiming that those who advocate for freedom are just destroying freedom by chasing selfish inclinations. But it goes a step further, in saying that they are the tip of the spear, so to speak.
 
-Firstly, some of the more ridiculous points that have been repeatedly disseminated have said something like that the advocacy of the Freedom Convoy, and those who support them, is actually their demand to have constraints put on the public. This is often elaborated as things which include the banning of vaccination, the closing of hospitals, the dissolving of a functional government (both formally and informally), the banning of face masks (either by making it forbidden to wear them, or by some set of actions which lead to them becoming unavailable in the country).
+Firstly, some of the more ridiculous points that have been repeatedly disseminated have said something like that the advocacy of the Freedom Convoy, and those who support them, is a demand to have constraints put on the public. This is elaborated to include banning vaccination, closing hospitals, dissolving a functional government, banning face masks, and banning medicine.
 
-Next, we have claims that their actions are all centered around disrupting social services, making routes unnavigable, exhausting supplies and breaking the supply chain. There is something to be said for the breaking of supply chains, but that wasn't in the sense of them destroying those chains themselves, but in going on strike because of the conditions that were being imposed on them through a central authority. This is classic worker advocacy and, given that all of their critics are generally in favour of unions, and even the type to speak of unions romantically, it's somewhat perturbing to see, though predictably so, that the socialists who love unions hate them when they're advocating for freedom, liberty, personal choice, and so on.
+Next are claims that their actions are centered around disrupting social services, making routes unnavigable, and exhausting and breaking the supply chain. There is something to be said for the breaking of supply chains, but that wasn't in the sense of them destroying those chains themselves, but in going on strike because of the conditions that were being imposed on them through a central authority. This is classic worker advocacy and, given that all of their critics are generally in favour of unions, often to the point of romanticism, it's predictably perturbing to see that the socialists who love unions hate them when they advocate for liberty and personal choice.
 
-Lastly, there was quite a bit of rhetoric being used to put out the idea that the truckers had been captured and were being controlled by the Russians, Russian intelligence, or any villainous country or organization that had managed to place their tendrils in the minds of these pitchfork-wielding hicks who somehow learned to drive a truck without crashing it every time. These are insane conspiracy theories, of course, because regardless of whether there are international interests at play who wish to disrupt the affairs of other societies, that is something which is an evergreen problem, and which latches onto every opportunity for conflict possible, including this one. Regardless of whether this is a real problem, it's not being treated in a serious manner if it's only supposed that certain people can be affected by influence, if it explains all the motives for any of the participants, and if it's used to completely disregard the possibility that some of the players may have honest and authentic inclinations which may not yet be properly understood.
+Lastly, was endless rhetoric used putting out the idea that the truckers were captured and controlled by Russians, Russian intelligence, or any villainous country or organization that had managed to place their tendrils in the minds of these pitchfork-wielding degenerates who somehow learned to drive a truck without crashing. These are insane conspiracy theories, of course, because regardless of whether there are international interests wishing to disrupt the affairs of other societies, that is an evergreen problem which latches onto every opportunity for conflict, including this one. Regardless of whether this is a real problem, it's not being treated in a serious manner if it's supposed that only certain people are influenced and if it explains the motives for the participants while disregarding the possibility that some players may have honest and authentic inclinations which may not yet be properly understood.
 
 ##### Fear of Freedom
 
-Freedom isn't an easy proposition, especially if you've never had to fight for it, or if you've never been exposed where the denial of freedom is something palpable and clearly cognizable to you. The mind is always working through the set of sense apparatuses in order to obtain a viable field of vision and a proposition for action. Most of that process is one of simplifying complexity in order to make the body and environment something actionable.  A situation where the body and the spirit are being made to wade through the bizarre complexity of being and align the focal point with the potential for action and modification or conformation to the shapes and levers of the world. To interface with it, if you will, and find the best way to proceed in one's survival. If one doesn't have this capacity available to them, they become overwhelmed in the complexity to such a point that it becomes grotesque and overbearing.
+Freedom isn't an easy proposition, especially if you've never had to fight for it or been exposed to the clearly recognizable and palpable denial of your own freedom. The mind works through the set of sense apparatuses to obtain a viable field of vision and proposition for action. That is a process of simplifying complexity to make the body and environment actionable.  A situation where the body and the spirit are made to wade through the bizarre complexity of being and align the focal point with potential for action and modification or conformation to the shapes and levers of the world. To interface with it, if you will, and proceed in one's survival. If one doesn't have this capacity available to them, they become overwhelmed in complexity to the point of the grotesque and overbearing.
 
-True freedom is the threat of chaos, unfortunately, but it's something that, based on the nature of man having freedom to act and choose and have a focal point that the person directs and focuses through, is a natural inclination and, when freedom is sufficiently denied, you'll be hard pressed to find a human who does not react with great valiance and courage. It's just wired into us.
+True freedom brings the threat of chaos, unfortunately, but based on the nature of man having freedom to act and choose and have a focal point that the person directs and focuses through, is a natural inclination. When freedom is sufficiently denied, you'll be hard pressed to find a human who does not react with great valiance and courage. It's just wired into us.
 
-Without coming to that point, however, many will fall into the simplicity, of believing there is a prescribed protocol for all actions and environments and that, by adhering to the to an external authority and conforming to it, you and it come to be an extension of one another and, as such, you are given certain assurances and benefits that you might otherwise miss out on. This external authority functions to take the place of what would also be symbolized as the Father Figure or a God, which is comforting and stabilizing, if even only superficially and immediately.
+What is that? Because freedom is in service of truth. The possibility of truth to be sought and apprehended is the universal grounding thrust of human being, and is the only reasonable orienting factor for freedom. Freedom derives from this thrust, and is otherwise arbitrary pandemonium. That we acknowledge human freedom to pursue truth is essential to rational living.
 
-If you are particularly prone to negative emotion, then the urge to choose this option of operating becomes all the more natural, as deciphering and acting on your own behalf is distressing,especially when you're being told by all messaging apparatuses to panic and be on edge.
+Many fall into the simplicity of believing there is a prescribed protocol for all actions and environments and that, by adhering and conforming to an external authority, you and it come to be an extension of one another yielding certain assurances and benefits that might otherwise be missed out on. This external authority functions to take the place of what would also be symbolized as the Father Figure or a God, which is comforting and stabilizing, if only superficially in the immediate.
 
-##### Exclusion: Punished for Freedom
+If you are particularly prone to negative emotion, then the urge to choose this option of operating becomes all the more natural, as deciphering and acting on your own behalf is distressing, especially when being told by all messaging apparatuses to panic and be on edge.
 
-The threat of exclusion rears its head again as one recognizes that the source of self-justifying violence and power has a point of origin. Having that in mind makes it more difficult for anyone to find the motivation to hold the entity represented at that point of origin to account, but some acquiesce more easily than others.
+##### Exclusion: Punished for Freedom
 
-With a seemingly omnipotent force representing the morals and ethics of the environment, it seems so big and makes you feel so small. It's best to remain invisible, and even a coward, and assuming such a stance impels one to have hope and faith that they will be spared of any of its possibly tyrannical effects.
+The threat of exclusion rears its ugly head as the point of origin offering the self justification for violence and power. It's difficult for anyone to find the motivation to hold the entity most associated with the process of exclusion to account when doing so will only heighten that threat. That some acquiesce to such an entity more easily than others is hardly surprising and such a factor plays strongly in the magnitude of the threat. It's best to remain invisible, or even a coward, and assuming such a stance impels one to have hope and faith to be spared of any possible tyrannical effects.
 
-Even more complicating is that one intuits and finds evidence from one's peers that all other subjects of the shared social surroundings claim allegiance to the source of centralized power. In fact, if one seems to fall out of line with the currently represented code of that power, one runs the risk of being mocked, ridiculed and even vilified. It even becomes complicated to learn other people's thoughts, especially once they seem to be incongruent to the social fabric extending from and surrounding that authority, as the state has already told you what people believe and why. If, for instance, you were to agree with some of those forbidden views, you run the risk of incurring cognitive dissonance, complicating your life and that of your loved ones, and other people might even be willing to pretend to be of the appropriate sensibility expected of them, just to maintain social cohesion and their current momentum towards their goals and expectations. It's best to remain safe in one's bubble of conformity.
+One intuits and finds evidence through peers that other subjects of the shared social surroundings claim allegiance to the source of centralized power. If one seems to fall out of line with the currently represented code of that power, one runs the risk of being ridiculed and vilified. It even becomes complicated to learn other people's thoughts, especially once they seem to be incongruent to the social fabric extending from and surrounding that authority. The state has already told you what people believe and why. If, for instance, you were to agree with some of those forbidden views, you run the risk of incurring cognitive dissonance, complicating your life and that of your loved ones, and other people might even be willing to pretend to be of the appropriate sensibility expected of them, just to maintain social cohesion and their current momentum towards their goals and expectations. It's best to remain safe in one's bubble of conformity.
 
 ##### Real Freedom: The State
 
-In music, and particularly in jazz improvisation, it is said that you need some structure in order to liberate yourself. This might be something as simple as knowing the "shells" of the harmonic progression, which are generally the 3rd and 7th tone relative to the root in some harmonic configuration, in order to outline the tonality. With the movement of these voices outlining how the music unfolds, there really are no limits to what sorts of ideas you can come up with as your mind, fingers and rest of the body dance to your heart's delight!
+In music, and for particular example in jazz improvisation, it is said that you need some structure in order to liberate yourself. This might be something as simple as knowing the "shells" of the harmonic progression, which are generally the 3rd and 7th tone relative to the root in a harmonic progression, in order to carry the tonality. With the movement of these voices outlining how the music unfolds, there are no limits to what sorts of ideas one come up with as the mind, fingers and entire body dance to the heart's delight!
 
-With guard rails from the state to help you move through the tempest of an angry planet, you can finally find your place to express yourself, choose an identity, perform a role and entertain yourself. Without that structure, you are let flailing all over the place with no discernible direction. The structure gives you a path forward away from the doldrums of the stupor of crippling depression that one falls into when disabled through inaction in a sea of chaos. 
+With guard rails from the state to help you move through the tempest of an angry planet, you can finally find your place to express yourself, choose an identity, perform a role and entertain yourself. Without that structure, you are let flailing about with no discernible direction. The structure gives you a path forward away from the crippling stupor of depression that one falls into when disabled in a sea of chaos.
 
 ##### Freedom to Choose
 
-One of the loveliest parts of this dialectic has been to have those drawn into the cult assert that there's no such thing as force, violence or coercion except in the form of holding someone down and penetrating them with a needle. Anything up to that point is fair game and can be classified as the experience of having freedom; freedom from coercion, freedom of choice, freedom of autonomy, and so on.
+One of the loveliest parts of this dialectic has been to have those drawn into the cult assert that there's no such thing as force, violence or coercion except in the form of holding someone down and penetrating them with a needle. Anything up to that point is fair game and can be classified as the experience of having freedom; freedom from coercion, freedom of choice and freedom of autonomy.
 
-Indeed, the very same people who will assert that failure to enunciate sounds precisely as prescribed is a form of "literal violence" which is tantamount to partaking in "genocide" of an entire "class of people" are the same ones who will tell you that forcing you out of employment, subjecting you to a continuous barrage of messaging from the vertically stacked message apparatus of the corporatized state and every branch of entertainment continuously telling you that you deserve to be condemned, to be exiled, to be cast out of your family, to be denied medical treatment, to be denied access to purchase goods and services, to be denied the freedom to leave your home or even your room, and that you deserve to suffocate in an agonizing death which no one should even so much as feel one iota of sympathy for is not a form of force or coercion, but simply the experience of going through informed consent so you can make an easy decision about your life and personhood with a clear mind.
+Indeed, the very same people who assert that failure to enunciate sounds precisely as prescribed is a form of "literal violence" tantamount to partaking in "genocide" of an entire class of people are the same ones who will tell you that forcing you out of employment, subjecting you to the continuous barrage of the vertically stacked messaging apparatus of a corporatized state, every professional domain and every branch of pop culture entertainment claiming you deserve to be condemned, exiled, cast out of your family, denied medical treatment, access to goods and services, the freedom to leave your domicile, and that you deserve to suffocate an agonizing death for which no one should feel one iota of sympathy is not a form of force or coercion, but simply the experience of going through informed consent so you can make an easy decision about your life and personhood with a clear mind.
 
-And then there's also the wonderful fallback of plausibly denying state-sanctioned coercion because there was no official law to forcibly inject anyone. Even forgetting the phase of forcing people to show proof of vaccination before they enter into certain public areas or businesses, there were jurisdictions which, for a time, enforced lockdowns on only the portion of their citizenry that was unvaccinated, such as Austria. Another claim to fame for Austria, and quite in-line with its pedigree of treating different classes of people as fully-human and sub-human, was the decision to impose fines on people who refuse to take the vaccine. In some places, such as Greece, this was done for elderly persons who had not been injected (even taking it out of their pensions), while other places, like Austria, attempted to do this with everyone as a whole, with fines of up to €3,600.
+Bodily autonomy-advocates witnessed the fallback of plausibly denying state-sanctioned coercion as there was no law to forcibly inject anyone. Even forgetting the phase of forcing people to show proof of vaccination before they enter into certain public areas or businesses, there were jurisdictions which, for a time, enforced lockdowns on only the portion of their citizenry that was unvaccinated, such as Austria. Another claim to fame for Austria, painfully in-line with its pedigree of treating different classes of people as human or sub-human, was the decision to impose fines on people who refuse to take the vaccine. In some places, such as Greece, this was done for elderly persons who had not been injected, even taking it out of their pensions, while Austria attempted to do this with everyone as a whole with fines of up to €3,600.
 
-Such policies would be referred to as progressive and enlightened by public health advocates, politicians, and other subsets of Totalitarian fear-mongering cult initiates who would repeatedly claim that vaccines are the only way to "end the pandemic" with many of them, to this day, likely claiming that there was never any cessation to the ongoing pandemic which continues to torment us. Politicians who make such inflammatory statements are given a generous platform, completely void of any substantive criticism, such as Canadian Member of Parliament Jean-Yves Duclos, who served as the Federal Health Minister until mid 2023, who said that the "provinces could make vaccination mandatory". Indeed, "you're so lucky we aren't directly pointing the barrel of a gun to the head of your loved ones, forcibly restraining you, and using an 18 gauge needle just to make sure you feel the thrill of saving the lives of your countrymen. We are so nice to you!".
+Such policies would be referred to as progressive and enlightened by public health advocates, politicians, and other subsets of Totalitarian fear-mongering cult initiates who would repeatedly claim that vaccines are the only way to "end the pandemic". Many to this day likely claim there was never any cessation an ongoing pandemic which continues to torment us. Politicians who make inflammatory statements are given a generous platform, void of substantive criticism, such as Canadian Member of Parliament Jean-Yves Duclos, who served as the Federal Health Minister until mid 2023, who said that the "provinces could make vaccination mandatory". Indeed, "you're so lucky we aren't directly pointing the barrel of a gun to the head of your loved ones, forcibly restraining you, and using an 18 gauge needle to make sure you feel the thrill of saving the lives of your countrymen. We are so nice to you!".
 
-Honestly, could you imagine those who claimed there was no coercion not approving of a state-sanctioned campaign to utilize greater degrees of force, including fines and imprisonment, in order to get to each and every vaccine-refusenik? Shy of a few exceptions, the vast majority would unquestionably approve any proposition to escalate force for conformity.
+Honestly, could you imagine those who claimed there was no coercion not approving of a state-sanctioned campaign to utilize greater degrees of force, including fines and imprisonment, in order to get to each and every vac-refusenik? Shy of a few exceptions, the vast majority would unquestionably approve any proposition to escalate force to conform, as it would require no change on their part and serve to signal their good sense to all.
 
-Remember, these are the people that rationalize every step of their encroachment on other people's life by predicating their argument on unwritten and unspoken social contracts, who conflate failure to use language as genocide, who invent terms like cultural genocide to equivocate with terms which otherwise indicate enslavement, death and murder, and who claim that every human being has the right to every possible form of implement and assistance which might somehow reduce the amount of work they might have to do for themselves, not even just even for their survival, but even for their leisure and recreation. But when faced with a non-conformist, they express nothing but a wall of disdain and disgust, wishing for no single potentiation of survival to be extended to the "other".
+It's feasible to rationalize every step of encroachment on other people's lives by predicating an argument on unwritten and unspoken social contracts, especially for those who already conflate failure to use language as genocide, invent terms like cultural genocide to equivocate with enslavement, death and murder, and claim every human being has the right to every conceivable necessity and desire. But when faced with a non-conformist, they express nothing but a wall of disdain and disgust, wishing for no single potentiation of survival to be extended to the "other".
 
-Most people are not farmers and do not have the means to produce their own food. Mandating the administration of a medical treatment under even just the threat of loss of employment threatens someone with their very survival, the erosion of the health of themselves and their loved ones, the prospect of starvation and loss of productivity, and the inhibition of the development of their children. Imposing loss of access to resources and the facilities of society creates a class system and imposes hierarchical structural force on other human beings, which is in line with the projections about an oppressive world that the advocates of such a process are constantly proclaiming. It is clear that the messaging and policies intended to quell "vaccine hesitancy" are promoting and encouraging loss of health, vitality, years lived and death in those who do not agree with whatever is demanded of them, and to think that this isn't a form of force or coercion is dishonest, hateful and psychopathic.
+Most are not farmers and do not have the means to produce food. Mandating the administration of medical treatments under just the threat of lost employment threatens one's very survival, the erosion of health and that of their loved ones, the prospect of starvation, loss of productivity, and inhibiting their children's development. Imposing loss of access to resources and the facilities of society creates a class system and imposes actual hierarchical force along a social structure which is in line with the projections of an oppressive world to which collectivist activists constantly proclaim. It's clear the policies intended to quell "vaccine hesitancy" are encouraging loss of health, vitality, years lived and death in those who do not agree with whatever is demanded of them, and to think that this isn't a form of dehumanizing coercion would be strikingly conducive to a totalitarian future.
 
 #### Conformity as Resistance
 
-This dialectical juxtaposition has been instrumental in the overall attempt to transform society into a totalitarian state, something which I argue is the natural consequence of systems maintaining themselves across time as they grow in size and consolidate greater complexity
+This dialectical juxtaposition is instrumental in the overall progress of transforming society into a totalitarian state, something which I argue is the natural consequence of systems maintaining themselves across time as they grow in size and function to interpret and affect its own behaviour. This is different than claiming it a consciously chosen tool by those in a favourable position to attempt societal-level change which, though likely occurring, doesn't preclude from the notion that large-scale social changes that we experience are mostly affected by complex systems phenomena for which we can't truly know the impact our and our fellow brethren's actions have on society as a whole.
 
-There's no room for insubordination and non-conformity, thus they have to have a more totalizing pattern of behaviour imposed upon the entities within their scope of governance. Indeed, as we've seen, the words resist and resistance have become co-operated, manipulated and resynthesized to mean their complete opposite as those who advocate for collectivism and embed themselves in state activities in order to guide discourse and policy towards their desired ends are specifically those who are most conformist in their views and most likely to identify non-conformists as an "enemy of the people". They are, of course, claiming that to resist and the act of resisting is to become aligned with their movement for greater state censorship and enforcement of social norms, economic constraints and ever-increasing regulation which fundamentally infringes on liberty and freedom. For them, the enemy is freedom itself and people's desire for it, thus they see actual resistance as "ideology" which they equivocate with fascism and the far-right - terms they have made synonymous with terms understood in populist movements as representing a desire for freedom, such as the now fraught term capitalism.
+Any aspect functioning to reduce entropy and maintain behaviour, even temporarily, means reduced insubordination and non-conformity, thus inducing a more totalizing pattern of behaviour upon the entities within scope of the system should come to be expected, if even only naively. Indeed, as we've seen, the words resist and resistance have become co-operated, manipulated and resynthesized to mean their complete opposite as those who advocate for collectivism and embed themselves in state activities in order to guide discourse and policy towards their desired ends. We've seen those who are most conformist and likely to identify non-conformists as an "enemy of the people". They claim that to resist and the act of resisting is to become aligned with their movement for greater state censorship and enforcement of social norms, economic constraints and ever-increasing regulation which fundamentally infringes on liberty and freedom. For them, the enemy is freedom itself and people's desire for it, thus they see actual resistance as "ideology" which they equate to fascism and the far-right - terms understood in populist movements as representing a desire for freedom, such as the now fraught term capitalism.
 
-What began as a Marxist critique that the working class was not expressing the repressed revolutionary energy that had been concentrated and embedded deep in society has gradually escalated in the hyperbole of its representation while the source of that critique has itself positioned itself at every opportunity at the most centrally-located points of society possible such that the  messages generated from what is classically understood as the most dominant, authoritarian structures now describes the least powerful entities as the fiercely privileged champions of fascism already for simply not using their voice to demand increased centralization of power and control but especially so if they demonstrate any willingness to resist the consolidation and concentration of that power.
+What began as a Marxist critique of the working class not expressing the repressed revolutionary energy concentrated and embedded deep in society has gradually escalated in the hyperbole of its representation while the source of that critique has itself positioned itself at every opportunity at the most centrally-located points of society possible such that the messages generated from what is classically understood as the most dominant, authoritarian structures now describe the least powerful entities as the fiercely privileged champions of fascism for simply not using their voice to demand increased centralization of power, and especially so if demonstrating willingness to resist that concentration of power.
 
 #### Linguistically Supplanted
 
-What we see in the use (abuse) of language, is that all concepts of freedom have now been resynthesized to capture all terms associated with freedom and liberty, but as liberation through the unrelenting totalitarian structure. That is to say, those who are posited as benefitting from the empowerment of central authority will label themselves as liberatory and equitable, and these concepts are put forward to indicate that they provide a path for creating a freedom which can not yet otherwise exist, except as the pursuit of formulating the future freedom promised by the God entity which, in this case, is the Hegelian State. Those who criticize the reformulated concepts of freedom, and the authority of state as a whole, are now understood as being Fascist and of Fascism. This includes any resistance to the merging of private and public, the nationalizing of any implements of the social environment, and the bringing of all articulation of society within the control of the state.
+What we see in the (ab)use of language, is that concepts of freedom have now been resynthesized to capture all terms associated with freedom and liberty as liberation through an unrelenting totalitarian structure. That is to say, those who are posited as benefiting from the empowerment of central authority will label themselves as liberatory and equitable, and these concepts are put forward to indicate that they provide a path for creating a freedom which otherwise can not yet exist except as the pursuit of formulating the future freedom promised by the God entity which, in this case, is the Hegelian State. Those who criticize the reformulated concepts of freedom, and the authority of state as a whole, are understood as products of Fascism. This includes any resistance to the merging of private and public, the nationalizing of any implements of the social environment, and the bringing of all articulation of society within the control of the state.
 
 ### Dialectic of Victimhood
 
-Seen throughout the Covid-era was the assertion that those who are hesitant to accept or promote the vaccines, offered resistance to wearing a mask and social distancing, or those who didn't agree with vaccine mandates, travel restrictions and curfews, were simply those who were promoting a victimhood ideology built upon a foundation of paranoia and privilege. You see, these ideologues who dragged their feet against progress which would otherwise be leading us out of a pandemic were suffering from a false consciousness, partly due to their subversion by coordinated actors who wished to control them, like Russia, and partly due to their habit of trying to avoid changing, even for the better, as they already have it better than most.
+Seen throughout the Covid-era was the assertion that those who are hesitant to accept or promote the vaccines, offered resistance to wearing a mask and social distancing, or those who didn't agree with vaccine mandates, travel restrictions and curfews, were simply those who were promoting a victimhood ideology built upon a foundation of paranoia and privilege. You see, these ideologues who dragged their feet against progress which would otherwise have led us out of a pandemic were suffering from false consciousness, partly due to their subversion by coordinated actors who wished to control them, like Russia, and partly due to their habit of trying to avoid changing, even for the better, as they already have it better than most.
 
-As they tend to assume an oppressor role in a general sense as a member of society, their demand for free choice while crying about being a victim is actually an ideological tool, manifesting even at the opportunity of seizing and leveraging something that is truly of benefit for them. 
+As they mostly assume a general oppressor role as a member of society, their demand for free choice while crying about being a victim is actually an ideological tool, manifesting even at the opportunity of leveraging something is truly of benefit for them. 
 
-In contrast to these self-proclaimed victims, who are cesspool of disease and ill heath, are the real victims who always position themselves with the centralized authority. Those who are align with central authority and who are trying to complete the system of pristine life with virtually no ill health, poverty, and racism are being held back by those who won't conform or play-along, as they are not willing to be resilient or to sacrifice some of their own wants and desires, which direct them poorly, for the greater good. Acting in their own interest, or what they believe is in their interest, rather than that of others through methods which actually would be of benefit. Instead, they are paranoid that everyone is out to get them. Their resistance proves their paranoia and belief in delusion.
+In contrast to these self-proclaimed victims, who are a cesspool of disease and ill health, are the real victims who happen to position themselves with the central authority. Those who align with central authority and are trying to complete the system of pristine life with virtually no ill health, poverty, and racism are being held back by those who won't conform or play-along and who are not willing to be resilient or to sacrifice some of their wants and desires which direct them poorly and away from the greater good. Acting in what they believe is in their own interest, rather than that which includes others through methods which actually would be of benefit. Instead, they are paranoid that everyone is out to get them, and their resistance proves their paranoia and belief in delusion.
 
 Why do they do this? Most fundamentally, they view anything which might benefit others as something to their own detriment because it can harm their relative status. A reduction in their comparative advantage over the marginalized.
 
-Imagine thinking you are a victim while aligning yourself with the authorities and doing everything demanded of you, including singling out and flinging feces of vitriol upon any who don't fall in line, making jokes about their death, proclaiming them as less human, comparing them to the least desirable people to ever walk the earth, the Nazis, whom most wouldn't even consider as being worthy of life, particularly if the person considering it has grown up in the west and been subjected to western entertainment, and then to say that it is you who is the victim. You, who demands death of those lesser than you, who believes themselves to be congruent to all the most powerful sources of authority in the land, and who is enjoying, in their own opinion, all the most advanced offerings that civilization, science and technology have to offer, and in spite of all of that it is you who has been especially taken advantage of, made vulnerable and made to be exposed to the unwanted aspects of life more so than nearly any other, especially those whom you are wishing ill upon.
+Imagine thinking you are a victim while aligning yourself with the authorities and doing everything they demand of you, including singling out and flinging feces of vitriol upon any who don't fall in line, joking about their death, proclaiming them as less human, and comparing them to the least desirable people to ever walk the earth, the Nazis, whom most wouldn't even consider as being worthy of life, (particularly for anyone who grown up in the west and been subjected to western entertainment). You, who demands death of those lesser than you, believes themselves congruent with the most powerful sources of authority, and who is enjoying, in their own opinion, all the most advanced offerings that civilization, science and technology have to offer. In spite of it all, you still believe you've especially been taken advantage of, made vulnerable and made to be exposed to the unwanted aspects of life.
 
 ### Dialectic of Family
 
-At a certain point, every human wishes to fall back on the assurance that there is a source of familial loyalty in their lives whereby oneself and one's family members would be willing to take on what might be an increase of risk, even in the form of modest exclusion or reduction of salience with respect to the surrounding social sphere, in order to maintain proximity and compatibility with family, such as with even just the nuclear family. This is because, whatever our disagreements and problems, there will always remain the greatest potential for empathy, understanding, patience and intuitive symbioticism for one's family members, if even simply out of a respectful regard to the contributions of one's shared genetic antedecents. The symbioticism in particular, for example, might be seen as well-wishing and social support for one's success as an organism surviving in a broader environment, but it also includes such things as developmental influence as aligned and similar genetics, learning, nurturing and, furthermore, immunological maturation. This, of course, is a great oversimplification, as it goes without saying that familial interaction, for better or worse, establishes the base of physical, cognitive and social development in almost all humans, save some feral children, and that though there are risks and benefits in any social environment, one's lowest level scope of familial structure is the environment bearing the greatest impact on a child's development.
+It's in our nature to wish to be able to fall back on the assurance that there is a source of familial loyalty in their lives whereby oneself and one's family members would be willing to take on what might be an increase of risk, even in the form of modest exclusion or reduction of salience to the surrounding social sphere, in order to maintain proximity and compatibility with family. This is especially true concerning the nuclear family. This is because, whatever our disagreements and problems, there will always remain the greatest potential for empathy, understanding, patience and intuitive symbioticism for one's family members, if even simply out of a respectful regard to the contributions of one's shared genetic antecedents. The symbioticism in particular, might be seen as well-wishing and social support for one's success as an organism surviving a broad environment, but it also includes such things as developmental influence as aligned and similar genetics, learning, nurturing and, furthermore, immunological maturation. This, of course, is a great oversimplification, as it goes without saying that familial interaction, for better or worse, establishes the base of physical, cognitive and social development in all humans, save some feral children, and that though there are risks and benefits in any social environment, one's lowest level scope of familial structure is the environment bearing the greatest impact on a child's development.
 
 Though it barely needs to be stated, as there is ample evidence of this and it shouldn't even be controversial to state the proportionally more significant influence of family, as such, we can easily reference works that are commonly known, even outside of academic circles, such as Attachment Theory, Ecological Systems Theory and the better-known Hierarchy of Needs, which all reinforce these assumptions.
 
@@ -2350,81 +2354,91 @@ Though it barely needs to be stated, as there is ample evidence of this and it s
 3. Hierarchy of Needs
 - Abraham Maslow - Motivation and Personality (1954)
 
-Familial support begins with interaction between mother and child which, in our context, we can touch upon contextually by indicating it as part of the fundamental basis of immunological development. It is necessarily the case that the mother is exposed to, and has been exposed to, a wider and more dynamic range of biological phenomena informing her immunological capacities, and that this extends to opportunities for both exposure and adaptation by her offspring by virtue of her child-rearing activities. Though we may focus, in discussion on the prospect of a mother providing mature and differentiated antibodies to her child through mother's milk, it should be noted that a baby's immunological capabilities come most extensively from their innate immune system, such as that provided by T-cells. They differentiate as both CD8+ (helper) and CD4+ (killer) cells through many forms of exposure which includes discarded nucleoside sequences and DNA fragments present in exosomes delivered via skin, sweat, exhalation, breast milk, urine and feces. This is a rich form of exposure to real phenomena in the shared environment and it allows adaptation to occur precisely in the manner sought by the administration of vaccines.
+Familial support begins with interaction between mother and child which, we can touch upon contextually by indicating it as part of the fundamental basis of immunological development. It is necessarily the case that the mother is exposed to, and has been exposed to, a wider and more dynamic range of biological phenomena informing her immunological capacities, and that this extends to opportunities for both exposure and adaptation of her offspring by virtue of her child-rearing activities. Though we may focus, in discussing the prospect of a mother providing mature and differentiated antibodies to her child through mother's milk, it should be noted that a baby's immunological capabilities come most extensively from their innate immune system, such as that provided by T-cells. They differentiate as both CD8+ (helper) and CD4+ (killer) cells through many forms of exposure which includes discarded nucleoside sequences and DNA fragments present in exosomes delivered via skin, sweat, exhalation, breast milk, urine and feces. This is a rich form of exposure to real phenomena in the shared environment and it allows adaptation to occur precisely in the manner sought by the administration of vaccines.
 
-Surely people either learn this or come to have some intuition about it on the basis of learning about breast milk providing antibodies, which is more widely communicated across the popular landscape than most other health factoids because pregnant women will be incentivized to produce antibodies in response to a commercially available immune-inducing agents, and there rightly arise incentives around such a practice in its own rite.
+Surely people either learn this or come to have some intuition about it on the basis of learning that breast milk provides antibodies, which is more widely communicated across the popular landscape than most other health factoids for reasons which may include incentives arising from the expectation that pregnant women will produce antibodies in response to a commercially available immune-inducing agents.
 
 What explains this drive to prevent a child's robust development and the imposing of a supreme concern of evading the particles of this one classification seems that it can be chalked up to public health messaging, but I don't think that really begins to explain it.
 
-The offering up of one's child to the administration of new innovations and subjecting them to social conditioning that necessarily isolates them is many things, including the conforming to social expectations, but we should consider that it is a rite of passage, in that your child must undergo initiation to be accepted into the next stage or evolution of society. Perhaps more controversially, though, is that to pursue the administration of substances to one's child which are beyond one's comprehension is also intrinsically going to symbolize some form of sacrifice. There is something to be understood in the sense that people felt some impetus to allow certain harm to be incurred, even only as a modest, and even perhaps insignificant, risk of harm that was interpreted as being low, but simultaneously being one which can be catastrophic, as immune-related issues can sometimes become. To accept, choose or promote the administration of a substance which is beyond one's understanding also proves a world-view both to one's child and one's social milieu, and possible leads to some comfort that the state will understand you as having honoured its bidding which, as undertaken in the Covid era, indicates acceptance of and a more restricted future necessarily makes you more dependent on the state
+The offering up of one's child to the administration of new innovations and subjecting them to social conditioning that necessarily isolates them (be it psychologically, physically, or in the relative strength of their familial bonds) is many things, including the conformation to social expectations, but we should also consider as a rite of passage in that your child must undergo initiation to be accepted into the next stage or evolution of society. Perhaps more controversial, though, is that to pursue the administration of substances to one's child which are beyond one's comprehension also intrinsically symbolizes a form of sacrifice. There is something to be understood in the sense that people felt some impetus to allow certain harm to be incurred, even only as a modest and perhaps even insignificant risk of harm that was interpreted as being low enough to be reasonable, but simultaneously being one which can be catastrophic, as immune-related issues can sometimes become. To accept, choose or promote the administration of a substance which is beyond one's understanding also proves a world-view both to one's child and one's social milieu, and possible leads to some comfort that the state will understand you as having honoured its bidding which, as undertaken in the Covid era, indicates acceptance of a more restricted future. This comfort necessarily makes you more dependent on the state.
 
 #### Beyond the Child
 
-It gets more broad, still: !TODO: snitch culture, questioning beliefs, masking, exclusion, paranoia about family events, state messaging over family communication.
-Whenever examining stories of Totalitarianism, whether fictitious as in 1984, or in the real-life retelling of events by escapees of North Korea, or the scholars having dug into documented events from Soviet Russia and Communist China, one thing phenomenon which demonstrates the absolutely devastating degree by which cult mentality has taken over the mind of those aligned with the state is that of family betrayal. Perhaps what's most disconcerting, however, is the degree to which these may occur as developments that are incremental and insidious. That is to say, it is not a conscious and planned betrayal but a slow adoption of state-approved belief of which one is continuously prompted to signal alignment through their professional and recreational environments, and that this supplants familial loyalty as the first order set of socially-relevant principles by which one is expected to be well-versed.
+Public Health agencies, services and departments, like Public Health Ottawa, encouraged citizens to snitch on one another by providing them instructions to report when someone can be observed violating public health orders, such as insufficient social distancing, failure to wear a mask, failure to stay out of public parks, failure to close a non-essential business, failure to enforce proof of vaccination, and so on. The effect of living under these policies and related incidents is complex, meaningful and impossible to ever truly understand, but we can speculate on what the effect of living under these policies does to family relations.
+
+Modest disagreement or even the prospect of utilizing an open discussion among family members to better understand their circumstances are complicated by the fact of said members being aware of the potential to snitch on their fellow neighbours and, indeed, even their fellow family members should believe someone having failed to adhere to the policy ordered by public health mandates. This might simply be that there is already some unwillingness to discuss matters to an appreciable degree of detail and that the threat of enforcement by authorities is itself something to be referred to as the evidence of what is true. This is damaging for discussions which aren't themselves a violation of any set of public health orders, regardless of the legitimacy of public health orders as a whole, and it's likely that there is certainly an incentive to the state authority and its public health agencies to eliminate discussions among the citizenry which might lead to the doubting and challenging of state decrees, state determinations, and so forth.
+
+The dance of the mask alone could serve to source a thousand books without yet fully elucidating the subject in its entirety. The manner in which its use can defy the stated logic of its operator concerning the details of its application, the declared rationale, and all of the particular motivations, egotistical paralogy, semantics of mythology and more can be validated or rejected through the evidence of one's having chosen to wear the mask. It is indeed a toxic affair made all the more complicated through the state suggesting or even ordering that it is to be adorned in even the private domiciles of the citizens.
+
+It is not conclusively knowable whether there is a greater positive effect on health through familial integration and open communication versus simple imposition of state-enforced public health decrees, but it would stand to reason that one has been foundational in our evolution and development as a species, and that there is ample research indicating the health of one's familial bonds does indeed have an impact on one's health.
+
+Allowing for the means to moralize and make declarations about the shape and limit of another's ethics, intelligence and knowledge to be predicated on authoritative positions which aren't intended for deliberation, particularly because the state has declared that a great threat to humanity, the vulnerable, and survival means that members of a family can now eliminate the work of making reasonable determinations t those closest to them. Having such a forceful fallback available in the face of declining quality of open communication between family members can accelerate the rate of that decline.
+
+Whenever examining stories of Totalitarianism, whether fictitious as found in 1984, in the real-life retelling of events by escapees of North Korea, or the scholars having dug into documented events from Soviet Russia and Communist China, one phenomenon demonstrating the absolutely devastating degree by which cult mentality has taken over the mind of those aligned with the state is that of family betrayal. Perhaps most disconcerting is the degree to which these may insidiously occur as incremental developments. That is, it's not a conscious betrayal but a slow adoption of state-approved beliefs of which one is continuously prompted to signal alignment through professional and recreational environments, and that this supplants familial loyalty as the first order set of socially-relevant principles by which one is expected to be well-versed.
 
 Though this is always playing out to varying degrees, the manner is unsurprisingly predictable.
 
 ##### Familial Negation
 
-!TODO: I hesitate to call it the state-approved sets of "thought" actual philosophies, of which they rarely are - especially when disseminated by the state.
+The primary mode of imposition is the tension brought about through the denial of one's beliefs which isn't necessarily on the basis of refuting the logical content of any said belief, but through making the rationale of any non-approved belief inadmissible. The family member initiated into the state-congruent collectivist *philosophy* need not articulate or champion any particular belief beyond the belief of aligning with central authority, even to the exclusion of the family.
 
-The primary mode of imposition is the tension brought about through the denial of one's beliefs which isn't necessarily on the basis of refuting the content of the description of any said belief, but through making the rationale of any non-approved belief inadmissible. The family member who is initiated into the state-congruent collectivist *philosophy*.
+I hesitate to call state-approved sets of "thought" actual philosophies, of which they rarely are - especially when disseminated by the state, as they are not systems of thought in and of themselves, but tools by which the state can declare its own plausible deniability as to whether it is ignorant of the predicates and implications bound to its own commands.
 
 ###### State Enforcement
 
-A lot of what takes place after the dismissing of one's attempts to proclaim their beliefs or present their rationale for said belies is an numeration of properly palatable options which serve as an affordance trap ( !NOTE: citation needed ). These state approved options are presented before the articulation of one's thoughts can take place in order to prevent thoughts from being fully formed and digested. If the articulation does take place, however, it is to be disregarded and is often met with the discontinuation of the interaction which is often prompted by the declaration of a wound having been identified or collected by the initiated member. Thought termination is necessary in order to proclaim the acceptable beliefs which must be absorbed wholesale without deconstruction, disambiguation or critique. This process must always take place to satisfy the initiate's baseline conditions for acceptable family bonding.
+A lot of what takes place after dismissing one's attempts to proclaim their beliefs or present their rationale for those beliefs is an enumeration of properly palatable options which serve as an affordance trap, which is the provisioning of options to give the illusion of openness and choice when in fact the range of selection only serves as a means of limiting or rendering one incapable of discovering other more legitimate choices. These state approved options are presented before the articulation of one's thoughts can take place in order to prevent thoughts from being fully formed and digested. If the articulation does take place, however, it is to be disregarded and is often met with the discontinuation of the interaction which is often prompted by the declaration of a wound having been identified and collected by the initiated member. Thought termination is necessary in order to proclaim the acceptable beliefs which must be absorbed wholesale without deconstruction, disambiguation or critique. This process must always take place to satisfy the initiate's baseline conditions for acceptable family bonding.
 
-The result of this practice is atomization which, though already occurring broadly in the society at large, is now also occurring in real time in the environments that are otherwise most resistant to it.
+The result of this practice is atomization which, though already occurring broadly in society at large, is now also occurring in real time in the environments that are otherwise most resistant to it.
 
 ###### Delegation of Reason
 
-In having an approved set of resources to draw from and which, as per their origin, present a morally-implicated rationale for their imposition, the state-enforcer in the familial environment no longer has to undertake the work of articulating their reasons in real time, particularly if any supplemental requirement is demanded of them. The authoritative characteristics of their source provide endless means of asserting in a manner bears plausible deniability, at least as per discourse which complies with "polite society".
+With the pre-approved resources of polite society guaranteeing vetted, non-controversial argumentation of heavy, morally-implicated weight on matters of strong disagreement, the state-enforcer no longer has to undertake the task of articulating themselves in real time. The authoritative aspect of the source provides endless means of making assertions while maintaining plausible deniability in the face of pesky, conflicting semantics. 
 
-In the case of the covid-era, this means that one's conduct which may previously have been considered to be threatening as per the rhetoric surrounding the level and structure of the threat to which we are subjected can be dismissed out of hand, even when being contradicted by new behaviour which is qualitatively different, simply on the basis that recommendations have changed and that they are to be believed wholesale without any process of comprehension having to take place, unless as a sort of intellectual luxury extending from already having proclaimed agreement with the new state-provided description.
+In the case of the covid-era, this means that one's previous conduct which may previously have been considered to be threatening as per the rhetoric, even of that time, surrounding the particulars of the "threat" can be dismissed out of hand, especially when contradicted by new information, simply on the basis that recommendations have changed and the source of those recommendations is being respected. With agreement in place, any nuanced understanding is a sort of intellectual luxury extending from having already proclaimed agreement.
 
 ###### Supplanted
 
-As the basis of the rationale for the denial of rationale is indicated through the proposition that the domains of knowledge available to persons are made as such through identity, the logically consequent proposition is that there are now a set of pre-approved identities which will serve as the foundation of family and that, if these are not fulfilled in the environment of an enclave of members with shared heredity, that they will be supplanted, at least from the perspective of the initiates, with persons presenting identities from other domains. In all cases you will find that those who are of the mind to have accepted the initiate language and external loyalty to entities outside of the family of shared heredity, that there are also going to be sources of communion and socialization from which they hope to mediate the threat of atomization and exclusion, and that this is presented to them through profession, other friendships and, in many cases, celebrities. You will find, almost faithfully, that these initiates are heavily interested in pop culture and will attend many pop events almost as a source of ritual for psychological and even spiritual fulfillment.
+As the basis for the denial of counter-rationale is indicated through proposing that available domains of knowledge are made as such through identity, the consequent proposition is that there are now a set of pre-approved identities which serve as the foundation of persons with non-harmful utterances and that, if these are not fulfilled in the environment of an enclave of members of shared heredity (normal family), they will be supplanted from the perspective of the initiates with persons presenting identities from other domains. In all cases you will find that those who are of the mind to have accepted the initiate language and external loyalty to entities outside the family will increasingly value other sources of communion and socialization from which they mediate the threat of atomization and exclusion. Such sources include profession, other friendships and, in many cases, celebrities. You will find, almost faithfully, that these initiates are heavily interested in pop culture and will attend many popular events as a source of ritual for psychological and spiritual fulfillment.
 
 ## Drive Towards Infection-Free Environments
 
-One of the consequences of the priming of fear towards the threat of infection, both prior to Covid with Hollywood films like "Contagion", and then through the early phases of the Covid-era, was the emergence of rhetoric which presupposed that any amount of infection by any pathogen at all was something that was should strive to eliminate as a species. That this particular pathogen was harbouring such an inexplicable degree of harm that it's time to consider that humans and human society should evolve such as to eradicate the threat of even incidental, nominal and miniscule occurrences of infection which aren't accompanied with noticeable symptoms.
-
-Though there were voices describing the phenomenon of viral infection in precisely this way, including ones from academia, the movement of "zero-Covid", though likely buttressed and portrayed as larger than it may have been by social media campaigns, public health advocacy and private interest groups, grew to sizeable proportions and was, in effect, the logical conclusion of rhetoric which had been composed to maximize fear and interest in unquestionable uptake of the primary treatment sought by state governments across the globe (the one which starts with "V"). It didn't really make sense to think about the threat of coronaviruses, or any virus, in any manner except one with an eventual goal to make infection impossible. This was because of the unchanging goal of the Covid-era always being the neutralizing of infection. Vaccination was always described as yielding humans as being the final endpoint for the coronavirus as it wouldn't be able to transmit from that point onwards, which stayed in line with the original public health enforcements whose rationale always centered on the fact of there being vulnerable for whom a risk of infection was unacceptable; all of the demands for force and coercion centered on the premise that the only manner in which a safe environment could be achieved for the particularly vulnerable would be to ensure that every individual in that environment had received a "full immunization". Additionally, the rhetoric of fear maintained its intensity regardless of changes to the relative profile being found in sequenced viral specimens of various regions as time went on (which took on names such as Omicron, for example). If the conversation surrounding the evolution of viruses has been made such as to exclude the concept of its diminishing virulence across time, then it stands to reason that all viral infection should be avoided and, if possible, neutralized from taking place using whatever technological means are available to mankind.
-
-!TODO: Disambiguate the above.
+One of the consequences of the priming of fear towards the threat of infection, both prior to Covid with Hollywood films like "Contagion", and then through the early phases of the Covid-era, was the emergence of rhetoric which presupposed that any amount of infection by any pathogen at all was something that we should strive to eliminate as a species. That this particular pathogen was harbouring such an inexplicable degree of harm that it's time to consider that humans should evolve to eradicate the threat of even incidental, nominal and miniscule occurrences of infection which aren't accompanied with obvious and acute symptoms.
 
-What is the drive towards the idea of a society which must be free of the threat of infection? Do we know that an infection-free society would be a good thing? Some possibilities include:
-- [] Transcendence !TODO: still need this one
+Though there were voices describing the phenomenon of viral infection in precisely this way, including ones from academia, the movement of "zero-Covid", though likely buttressed and portrayed as larger than it may have been by social media campaigns, public health advocacy and private interest groups, grew to sizeable proportions and was, in effect, the logical conclusion of rhetoric which had been composed to maximize fear and interest in unquestionable uptake of the primary treatment sought by state governments across the globe (the one which starts with "V"). It didn't really make sense to think about the threat of coronaviruses, or any virus, in any manner except one with an eventual goal of making infection impossible. This was because the unchanging goal of the Covid-era was always the neutralizing of infection. Vaccination was always described as yielding humans as being the final endpoint for the coronavirus as it wouldn't be able to transmit from them onwards, which stayed in line with the original public health enforcements whose rationale always centered on the fact of there being vulnerable for whom a risk of infection was unacceptable; all of the demands for force and coercion centered on the premise that the only manner in which a safe environment could be achieved for the vulnerable was to ensure that every individual in that environment had received "full immunization". Additionally, the rhetoric of fear maintained its intensity regardless of changes to the relative profile found in sequenced viral specimens in various regions as time went on (which took on names such as Omicron, for example). If the conversation surrounding the evolution of viruses has been made such to exclude the concept of its diminishing virulence across time, then it stands to reason that all viral infection should be avoided and, if possible, neutralized from taking place using whatever technological means are available to mankind.
 
-The drive towards the idea of a society which is completely free of the threat of infection has many aspects, and much historical precedent. Certainly, there are factors worthy of consideration, at least insofar as the motivations are concerned, which indicate, at some level, positive characteristics about human beings. But, when seeking an absolute outcome which is not only outside the reasonable conception of reality, but also an outcome which cannot be reliable ascertained as a positive or net-good for our species and which is, more likely, a net-negative and possibly even catastrophic outcome, we can begin to hypothesize how best to frame these motivations.
+The drive towards the idea of a society completely free of infection might include, at some level, positive characteristics about human beings. But, when seeking an absolute outcome which is not only outside the reasonable conception of reality, but also an outcome which cannot be reliable ascertained as a positive or net-good for our species and which is, more likely, a net-negative and possibly even catastrophic outcome, we can begin to hypothesize how best to frame these motivations.
 
 I would suggest that the motivations themselves are echoing some of our darker proclivities and that these have already manifested in some of the more extreme outcomes of our recorded history.
 
 ### Survival Instincts
 
-To be fair, there is of course a survival instinct that most of us felt in touch with early on in the Covid-era, if even just before the official announcement when the fearful discourse was fresh and unfamiliar. This gives a good base for empathy to work from, but the fact remains that many who did fear for their lives and health early on overcame that fear and were in many cases putting themselves in situations that they believed to be of elevated risk if even just for the principle of how their behaviour would contribute to the potential of an increasingly totalitarian society. For example, many who believed that the threat was elevated, or who were at least affected by the continuous messaging from all angles and sources, whether authoritative, entertainment, workplace or one's own personal friends such that it gets in your head to keep thinking about the possibility that you are within spitting distance of the most uncomfortable week of your life, or even death, would still refuse to wear a mask or avoid seeing certain people face-to-face, simply to push back on the process of conformity which was unfolding all around us. So survival instinct is not a sufficient rationale on its own, especially not in the case of rationalizing one's drive towards desiring an infection-free society.
+To be fair, most got in touch with survival instincts early on in the Covid-era, if even just around the time of the official announcement when the fearful discourse was fresh and unfamiliar. This gives a good base for empathy to work from, but the fact remains that many who did fear for their lives and health early on overcame that fear and were in many cases putting themselves in situations that they believed to be of elevated risk if even just for the principle of how their behaviour would contribute to the potential of an increasingly totalitarian society. For example, many who believed that the threat was elevated, or who were at least affected by the continuous messaging from all angles and sources, whether authoritative, entertainment, workplace or one's own personal friends such that it gets in your head to keep thinking about the possibility that you are within spitting distance of the most uncomfortable week of your life, and even death, would still refuse to wear a mask or avoid seeing certain people face-to-face, simply to push back on the process of conformity which was unfolding all around us.
+
+It's also worth mentioning that some of the most ardent cult covidists view harm to themselves as evidence of their correct worldview and corresponding world mission. When one considers the overlap between, as an example, persons who sacrifice their health and body for Queer praxis and Covidism, it becomes clear that survival instinct isn't the appropriate framing. Note that this is not synonymous with fear of death which, though seeming to be something that one is avoiding through survival, acts is discretely cognized as a motivator for such things which ruin survivability and lifespan. So survival instinct, while playing an aspect, is not a sufficient rationale on its own, especially not in the case of rationalizing one's drive towards desiring an infection-free society.
 
 ### Contamination
 
-Now we're getting somewhere, because the fear of contamination and heightened disgust sensitivity was palpable among those who were most ardent in their insistence that measures be followed and that a perfect endpoint was hopefully around the corner. What was most notable was an unquestionable desire to follow authority and even take up the opportunity to report and snitch on strangers, friends, colleagues, and even family members. In fact, it was explicitly encouraged in some circumstances, and given the atomization that our society has witnessed over the past few years, it's not far-fetched to recognize how quickly society can change towards engaging such practices.
+Now we're getting somewhere, because the fear of contamination and heightened disgust sensitivity was palpable among those who were most ardent in their insistence that measures be followed and that a perfect endpoint was hopefully around the corner. What was most notable was an unquestionable desire to follow authority and even take up the opportunity to report and snitch on strangers, friends, colleagues, and even family members. It was even explicitly encouraged, whether through public health notices, 311 listings, or statements from politicians and public health officers. Given the atomization that our society has witnessed over the past few years, it's not far-fetched to recognize how quickly society can change and engage in such practices.
+
+In fact, the threat of infection can override people's self-narrative about what standards they consider acceptable for society not just during the moment of extraordinary circumstance but in general, leading to advocating dehumanization, exclusion of those who believe, behave or appear differently, and the erecting of authoritarian policies which would be difficul to overturn, and which leave a bitter precedent for authoritarians to draw at a future opportunity.
 
-In fact, the threat of infection can override people's self-narrative about what standards they consider acceptable for society not just during the moment of extraordinary circumstance but in general, leading to advocating dehumanization, exclusion of those who believe, behave or appear differently, and the erecting of authoritarian policies which would be difficult or even impossible to overturn, at least in theory should the system of governance and corresponding society sustain itself.
+We saw this first hand with inflammatory language describing the unvaccinated, vaccine-hesitant, and unmasked as unclean vectors of disease, unevolved and deeply immoral subhumans. The comparison to vermin was reminiscent of Nazi-era rhetoric where such comparisons were a central feature of public messaging.
 
-We saw this first hand with inflammatory language describing the unvaccinated, vaccine-hesitant, and unmasked as unclean disease vectors, unevolved and deeply immoral subhumans. The comparison to vermin was reminiscent of Nazi-era rhetoric where such comparisons were a central feature of public messaging.
+Some social psychologists observed what they believed to be a paradox in that those who declare themselves as aligned with a right-leaning political party seemed to be less concerned about the threat of infection, which called into question the presumption that disgust sensitivity is a rigorously understood thrust of human behaviour and that either it did not yield the magnitude of effect previously thought, or it was being overridden by other factors which inform right-leaning preferences.
+
+I contend that this is another indication that what is traditionally understood as a left-right political dimension is actually only axiomatically coherent with a clear and universal conceptual framework of entropy tolerance, which can be reframed in political terms as order vs chaos, or liberty vs authority, and that our association of current political parties is based on cultural ascriptions rather than whether they truly adhere to a concept of comparing openness for information and exploration against a need for order, authority and the assurance that one can inhabit a central locale within the social environment. That is to say, persons with conservative personality characteristics have come to associate themselves with superficially left-leaning politics because the promise authoritarian governance.
 
 #### Moral Purity
 
-Along with the obsession with contamination and the categorizing of people as being members of the disease ridden and unclean was a sense of moral purity which was both intrinsically bound to this phenomenon and prevalent in the language used by public officials.
+Along with the obsession of contamination and the categorizing of people as being members of the disease ridden and unclean was a sense of moral purity which was both intrinsically bound to this phenomenon and prevalent in the language used by public officials.
 
-From the rhetoric that was being disseminated and the response by those who seemed to acknowledge its rationale and who abided by it on a seemingly religious basis, it was clear that the decrees would be adopted and followed regardless of level of threat, just so long as the central authority was broadcasting the demand. What's clear is that, when taken to their logical conclusions, the rationales being disseminated were ones which, regardless of the efficacy of the measures prescribed, (for which) the conditions always serve as a sufficient predicate.
+From the rhetoric that was being disseminated and the response by those who seemed to acknowledge its rationale and abide by it on a seemingly religious basis, it was clear that the decrees would be adopted and followed regardless of the level of threat, just so long as the central authority was broadcasting the demand. What's clear is that, when taken to their logical conclusions, the rationales being disseminated were ones for which, regardless of the efficacy of the measures prescribed, the conditions always serve as a sufficient predicate because they seem to serve a higher purpose.
 
-That is to say, if there is always a portion of the population which is too vulnerable to adapt to the ever-differentiating threats of the environment, and if erecting barriers between us and making use of implements which supposedly prevent us from being infected with an antigen while also preventing us from transmitting it to others, then it stands to reason that it's always a good idea to apply measures, particularly when considering that there is no private health without public health; that is to say, there is no way of guaranteeing the best possible conditions from which your personal health can be influenced except through a public health apparatus which is functioning such as to affect those conditions in the first place.
+That is to say, if there is always a portion of the population which is too vulnerable to adapt to the ever-differentiating threats of the environment, and if erecting barriers between us and making use of implements to supposedly prevent infection while also preventing us from transmitting to others, then it stands to reason that it's always a good idea to apply measures, particularly when there is no private health without public health; that is to say, there is no way of guaranteeing the best possible conditions from which your personal health can be influenced except through a public health apparatus which is functioning such as to affect those conditions in the first place. Even if its guarantee is not attained, it stands as the promise of its pursuit.
 
-That these modes of thought completely abstain from considering the degree to which other factors of resilience are developed in a social environment, such as the fact of healthy persons developing the means of acting as sinks for pathogens while distributing safer fragments and signals about the threats to which we may all be subjected, or the fact of how isolation, reduced activity and reduced exposure might lead to less general vitality, tells you not only about the degree to which many may be unaware of the complexity of the issue, but also that the phenomenon of people adopting societally-enforced measures on the basis of collective safety who might actually be aware of some of these complexities would necessarily be incentivized by the perception that there is an immediate risk of health on themselves, and that the degree to which the frail and infirm might be made even more fragile under the circumstance of increased isolation, and the degree to which families relying on businesses that were deemed non-essential might be impacted negatively in a way which imposes a non-null effect on health and well-being, tells us that these motivations of survivability towards an aesthetic of cleanliness and moral purity are motivations of individuals wishing for an improved level in terms of the risk of disease that they themselves are being subjected to, and that this motivation would continue regardless of the ill effect that might develop long term for society as a whole, just so long as one maintained a belief either that their immediate threat is being reduced, or that the enforcement mechanisms are from a centralized entity to which they are maintaining some form of alignment.
+These modes of thought completely abstain from considering other factors of resilience that are developed in a social environment. For example, the fact of healthy persons developing the means of acting as sinks for pathogens while distributing safer fragments as signals about the threats to which we may all be subjected, or the fact of how isolation, reduced activity and reduced exposure reduce general vitality. This tells you not only about the degree to which many may be unaware of the issue's complexity, but also that the phenomenon of people adopting societally-enforced measures on the basis of collective safety who might actually be aware of some of these complexities would necessarily be biased by the belief in an immediate risk to themselves, and that the degree to which the frail and infirm might be made yet more fragile under the circumstance of increased isolation, and the degree to which families relying on "non-essential businesses" are impacted negatively imposing a non-null effect on health and well-being, tells us that these motivations of survivability towards an aesthetic of cleanliness and moral purity are motivations of individuals wishing for an improved level in terms of the risk of disease that they themselves are being subjected to. This motivation could continue regardless of an ill effect developing long term for society as a whole just so long as one maintains a belief that their immediate threat is being reduced or that the enforcement mechanisms are from the central entity to which they maintain alignment.
 
-Furthermore, as the mind becomes more preoccupied with the threat of infection, there is a greater desire for control and order versus freedom and chaos, which coincides with what we said earlier about the effect of a risk of infection on predisposition towards traditionally "far-right", but best understood as authoritarian or totalitarian systems.
+Furthermore, as the mind becomes more preoccupied with the threat of infection, there is a greater desire for control and order versus freedom and chaos, which coincides with what we said earlier about the effect of a risk of infection on predisposition towards "far-right" beliefs and preferences, though better-stated as authoritarian or totalitarian systems.
 
 !TODO: disgust sensitivity and personality
 !TODO: disgust sensitivity and societal transformation
@@ -2439,43 +2453,39 @@ Furthermore, as the mind becomes more preoccupied with the threat of infection,
 
 !TODO: Below needs redrafting
 
-Whenever there is a lever by which authoritarian implements can be wielded to compel, coerce or manipulate people, those with a disposition towards power and control will not be able to resist wielding it. During the Covid-era, this means that those who gravitate towards taking up positions which play a role in the administration or oversight of power as per the need for new safety measure are likely to find their moment to do as such.
+Whenever there is a lever by which authoritarian implements can be wielded to compel, coerce or manipulate people, those with a disposition towards power and control will not be able to resist wielding it. During the Covid-era, this means that those who gravitate towards taking up positions which play a role in the administration or oversight of power as per the need for new safety measures are likely to find their moment to do as such.
 
-We saw it in immersive, overbearing and exorbitant abundance during the Covid-era as so many in leadership roles spoke in such inflexible terms and unwavering demeanour about the new standards with clearly deducible implications for human freedom and liberty. They did this for such a long portion of the Covid-era, with many more continuing to this day, without even so much as a tentative comment revealing the tiniest bit of concern about the short or long term consequences on human freedom. This is in no small part related to the phenomenon of person seeking political power with a collectivist conception of an assumed social contract whose understanding of freedom and liberty is predicated on a collective trajectory towards improving the conditions of the world as they perceive them and with such a prospect of traversal serving as the precondition from which any notion of freedom can be considered.
+We saw it in immersive, overbearing and exorbitant abundance during the Covid-era as so many in leadership roles spoke in such inflexible terms and unwavering demeanour about the new standards with clearly deducible implications for human freedom and liberty. They did this for such a long portion of the Covid-era, with many more continuing to this day, without even so much as a tentative comment revealing the tiniest bit of concern about the long term consequences on human freedom. This is in no small part related to the phenomenon of persons seeking political power with a collectivist conception of an assumed social contract whose understanding of freedom and liberty is predicated on a collective trajectory towards improving the conditions of the world as they perceive them. Such a prospect of traversal serves as the precondition from which any notion of freedom can be considered.
 
-When the very notion of freedom changes from something universally applicable as a default modality of human life, if even as something to be valued in theory, to that which extends from the fulfillment of objectives as indicated by someone who necessarily perceives their social surroundings as one in which the powers of state enforcement are available at their fingertips, it shouldn't be considered intelligent to expect anything other than an ongoing transition of society towards something which is always more tyrannical. To add the element of the threat of disease, if even as just part of the rhetoric, then the expectation should be for such an approach of tyranny to be accelerated.
+When the very notion of freedom changes from something universally applicable as a default modality of human life, if even as something to be valued in theory, to that which extends from the fulfillment of objectives as indicated by someone who necessarily perceives their social surroundings as one in which the powers of state enforcement extend through them, a transition of society towards something more tyrannical should follow. Adding the element of the threat of disease, even just in the rhetoric, accelerates this transition.
 
 #### Inducing Pathology
 
-We've given people a huge chance to control their environments, peer groups, workplaces, communities, organizations, friends, partners, families and essentially anyone with whom they have disagreements, particularly of how this topic became embedded in every moment and aspect of everyone's lives and because of how propaganda, social media and an interdisciplinary-focused academia that was inebriated with Social Justice.
+We've given everyone ample opportunity affect control of their peer groups, workplaces, communities, organizations, friends, partners, families and essentially any environment wherein they may have a disagreement, as this topic became embedded in every moment and aspect of everyone's lives. This was enhanced through use of conventional propaganda, social media and interdisciplinary-focused academia already inebriated with Social Justice.
 
-When everything is predicated on a greater good and the risk of the destruction of all thing sand the risk of you harming me or me harming you, you can have it every way you like a whatever moment you like and anything you assert can be implied as being supported by the authorities because you align on a higher level objective and since the weeds can't all be known and perfectly understood at high resolution, as everything is in a process of discovery (but anyone who is aligned with the same outcome is doing the science whereas everyone who is against it is anti-scientific), then we have a never ending means of rationalizing on the basis of authority just about anything that the control freak wants
+With a mission predicated on the greater good and alleging it to function such as to quell the risk of destroying all things and ourselves, and elaborated to interface with every enumerable social issue, one has sufficient rationale to compel collective action for their desired issue by declaring support from authorities by alignment on higher level objective. One can maintain a low resolution scope of discourse while referring to authority, insist their view is scientific, and insist that all with a contrary position are anti-science.
 
-And, what's even worse, is that they get validated and find a form of toxic community to support them in all of this at a time when people are most divided and isolated, both figuratively and literally, and so everyone is a bit more on edge and ready to embrace these opportunities if they have the necessary proclivities. It worsens the pathological tendencies and hides the worst of the outbursts which aren't as public as they once were. People are isolated for longer, crazier for longer, and more tolerant of a lower expectation for human freedom, liberty and open aired reasoning (or open air anything, as it was)
+Yet worse is the easy of finding validation through toxic community to support them at a time when people are most divided and isolated, both figuratively and literally. Everyone is a bit more on edge and ready to embrace these opportunities if they have the necessary proclivities. This worsens pathological tendencies the worst outbursts of which aren't subject to the same public criticism as before. People are isolated for longer, crazier for longer, and more tolerant of a lower expectation for human freedom, liberty and open aired reasoning or open air anything as it were.
 
-This reinforcing of dubious behaviour combined with the state providing cover for one's linguistic manipulations on concepts like freedom and liberty, which are now contingent on the achieving of these other goals of sanitation and conformity, means that we are initiating, rewarding and exacerbating pathological habituation.
+This reinforcing of dubious behaviour combined with the state providing cover for one's linguistic manipulations on concepts like freedom and liberty, which are now contingent on the achieving of these other goals of sanitation and conformity, means that we are initiating, rewarding, habituating and exacerbating pathologies.
 
 ### Perfectionism
 
-Perhaps, for some, it's easier to avoid contemplating whether there is a risk involved for their children, particularly if it's being recommended, advocated and even demanded that you administer it to your child. It's easy to delegate the difficult question of evaluating the plausible ramifications when you can consider that, as all children are being made to participate and be subjected to something, then surely that increases the likelihood that it must be safe. And even if it were not safe, it would be a sacrifice that all would be committing to together, contributing to our shared strength and knowledge, and thus we have good reason to feel encouraged as we are en route to a perfection which, if ever attained, would likely be something developed, supported and maintained by the state.
-
-TODO: Need to complete this
+It's easier to avoid contemplating whether there is risk involved for their children, particularly if it's being recommended, advocated and demanded that you administer it to your child. It's easy to delegate the difficult question of evaluating the plausible ramifications when you can consider that, as all children are being made to participate and be subjected to something, then surely that increases the likelihood that it must be safe. And even if it were not safe, it would be a sacrifice that all would be committing to together, contributing to our shared strength and knowledge, and thus we have good reason to feel encouraged as we are en route to a perfection which, if ever attained, would likely be something developed, supported and maintained by the state.
 
 ## Historically-Oppressed Virus
 
 ### Vacation
 
-Back in 2022, after having been locked down for longer than one could remember, and having gone through a period of undulating, tyrannical policies including vaccine passports, masking, destruction of businesses and the economy, curfews (in many parts of the country), and restrictions on travel and even movement between cities and provinces, we were finally ready to take a vacation. Perhaps a year earlier, we had even considered that should we ever find ourselves able to take a vacation from Canada and, given the recent actions of the Canadian government, and the manner in which those actions were met with a combination of glee, manic enthusiasm, apathy and hopeless withdrawal by the Canadian citizenry, that it may possibly be one of the last vacations we are able to take (at least legally). At this time, however, it was already Christmas of 2022, and the echoing effects of the Canadian Freedom Convoy had made many of us more hopeful about the possibility of changing the tone and culture of the west such as to make a steady march towards totalitarianism less feasible, at least for the more immediate future.
+Back in 2022, after having been locked down for longer than one could remember, and having gone through a period of undulating, tyrannical policies including vaccine passports, masking, destruction of businesses and the economy, curfews, and restrictions on travel including movement between cities and provinces, we were finally ready to take a vacation. Perhaps a year earlier, we had even considered that should we ever find ourselves able to take a vacation from Canada and, given that the recent actions of the Canadian government were met with a combination of glee, manic enthusiasm, apathy and hopeless withdrawal by the Canadian citizenry, it may possibly be the last vacation we are able to legally take. At this time, however, it was Christmas of 2022, and the echoing effects of the Canadian Freedom Convoy had made us more hopeful about the possibility of changing the tone and culture of the west to make the steady march towards totalitarianism less feasible, at least for the immediate future.
 
-We made our way to the Dominican Republic, with our child, and without having to be struggled over the lack of proof of vaccination at the Canadian airport, and were finally able to enjoy some family time in the sun. It was wonderful for health, vitality, and the capacity to prime ourselves for a more inspiring outlook towards the future.
+We made our way to the Dominican Republic, with our child, and without having to be struggled over proof of vaccination at the Canadian airport, and were finally able to enjoy some family time in the sun. It was wonderful for health, vitality, and to prime ourselves for a more inspiring future outlook.
 
-As usual, I found the resort gym on the first day that we had arrived, as I quite enjoy training in new gyms, enjoying better recovery and having a level of activity which helps mitigate some of the delicious alimentary endeavours that the resort might offer.
+As usual, I found the resort gym on the day we arrived, as I quite like training in new gyms, enjoying better recovery and having a level of activity to help mitigate some of the delicious alimentary endeavours the resort might offer.
 
-At the gym, I saw another similarly-aged man who training with a respectable degree of effort, and we pleasantly introduced ourselves. He was a professor of oncology at university in the US and we had plenty of health and medicine related topics to discuss while attempting the maintain the pace of our workouts. I was actually quite impressed with how open minded he was about cancer research and the degree to which metabolism may play a role in certain cancers, and we delved into other related subjects, in close proximity to one another as we aerosolized or bodily fluids, came into contact with the same surfaces of the same gym equipment, and likely introduced one another's immune system to artifacts of the other's recent environments.
+At the gym, I saw another similarly-aged man training with a respectable degree of effort, and we pleasantly introduced ourselves. He was professor of oncology at a university in the US and we had plenty of health and medicine related topics to discuss while attempting to maintain the pace of our workouts. I was quite impressed with how open minded he was about cancer research and the degree to which metabolism may play a role in certain cancers, and we delved into other related subjects, in close proximity to one another as we aerosolized our bodily fluids, came into contact with the same surfaces of the same equipment, and introduced one another's immune system to artifacts of the other's recent environments.
 
-Before long, however, he began lamenting on the crazy right wing nutcases in America, likely assuming I despise any of the non-academic, non-intellectual and non-elite professional classes as he now seemed to, and their support of Donald Trump who, as a political figure that was not adequately championing the cause of addressing climate change (I am summarizing the professor's perspective), had played a hand in causing the pandemic. Yes, it was his opinion (though he might have said that it was an undeniable fact) that climate change had made the conditions of the world so unnatural that a freakish and defiled monstrosity of nature had manifested itself in the form of a coronavirus of unprecedented capacity to menace humanity, almost as a vengeful act of Gaia, and hurled itself at us in order to make us pay for our collective misdeeds.
-
-I was soon done my workout and went to offer him a cordial shake of my hand before I returned to my family in time for our dinner plans, only to find that he just left my hand hanging. In fact, he almost seemed mortified as though I might cause him a trip to hospital for intubation in an undeveloped country - how horribly selfish of me! I support the blood sweat and tears that his skin had absorbed off the leather and vinyl gym surfaces was more to his liking than something more direct as my well-callused paw.
+Before long, however, he began lamenting on the crazy right wing nutcases in America, likely assuming I too despise the non-academic, non-intellectual and  non-professional classes, and their support of Donald Trump who, as a political figure that was not adequately championing the cause of addressing climate change (per the professor's perspective), had played a hand in causing the pandemic. Yes, it was his opinion (though he might have said that it was an undeniable fact) that climate change had made the conditions of the world so unnatural that a freakish and defiled monstrosity of nature had manifested itself in the form of a coronavirus of unprecedented capacity to menace humanity, almost as a vengeful act of Gaia, and hurled itself at us in order to make us pay for our collective misdeeds.
 
 ### Climate Historicism
 
@@ -2520,7 +2530,6 @@ Yet still, even in this description, it would be facile to say that the doctrine
 
 ## Is Public Health a Good Idea?
 
-
 Public health construes the disease risk of society as being an aggregate of individual behaviours, but not necessarily in the context of the health of the individual humans. That is, though health can be assessed as the proportion of humans which are assigned certain classifications, such as a medical patients with a fatal illness, or proportion of population which falls in the cohort with the lowest mortality (e.g. females aged 5-19), for public health to be actionable it needs to be able to administer or confirm a characteristic within the population and attain a sufficient rate of participation. 
 
 Unfortunately, as it deals with the concept of health as can be applied at the public scale, it is necessarily totalitarian in its aspirations in that it cannot achieve a perfect outcome unless it has full participation by that public and a full quantification of corresponding elements of interest. Furthermore, as it deals more in observed group behaviour and political administration, any effort to describe or understand sub-perfect implementation becomes an ideological critique which is itself ideological. For this reason, it's not uncommon to hear public health practitioners comment on the propensity of non-participants as being the consequence of such conditions as end-stage capitalism, denialism, class-based oppression, and so forth.