# Adaptation
There is some misunderstanding as to why some might reject a particular therapy. It is assumed that the individual denies the utility that could be derived, or taht the effect of the therapy is a net negative to one's vitality, by some metric or another (or implied metric). This is not necessarily the case, however, as it could be assumed to be something more akin to the following circumstance:
- Therapy elicits adaptation which prouces measurable increase in immunologically mediating / active structures.
- The side effects are nil or are, at worst, comparable to the a normal toxic load on metabolism.
The literature and consensus agree that the adaptation falls within a range that is understood to be significant.
  - In spite of what seems like 100% benefit, the missing element is an agreed specification escribing the optimal desired adaptation, as well as proposed methodology to assess the degree which indicates success for achieving that outcome.
  - A set of possible side effects as well as aproposed range of verifiability for each
Understanding of many phenomena seem to suggest a universal principal about physics and reality:
- Our systems adapt to stimulii and the nuance of these adaptations does not have a limit of resolution, but a limit as to how well they can be perceived and observed.
exit