# Profit

## Question
*Does it all just come down to profit?*

Obviously, none of these undertakings are even viable if they cannot yield a profit, or the productive capacity wouldn't exist. These types of mechanisms are all set up as part of emergency preparedness planning, which is achieved through intergovernmental agencies at the global scale. That these agreements constitute a form o evidence supporting profit motive is akin to calling it a conspiracy. These are all things that can be organized in plain sight, therfore there are plenty of commonly understood explanations for every implementation detail.

We have already heard key politicians declare that covid is a unique opportunity to initiative and advance operations otherwise unfeasible and unviable - We should stop our habit of failing to criticize demands and proposals under general fear of being labeled conspiracy theory, because we can see that there needn't be a conspiracy when those who stand to benefit garnish their bias with hubris as they gloat in open sight without the most minimal semblance of self awareness (that which would be necessary to acknowledge risks associated with gamefying situational response (disaster relief, even sustainable development)).

So this brings us to the next question: why are we so uncritical? Well who are we talking about, in considerating being uncritical of the response?
1. Those who support it, or don't support it
2. Those who experience a consequence of their public visibility on the matter
- supporter visibility: congruence with the overwhelming and prevailing narrative - one which makes them salient in political discourse, media discourse, medical discourse, compatible with many popular messages that had been ramping throughout (or at least, for the first )
- non-supporter visibility: