# ALA

What we have happening in the world right now is that states starting with montana and iowa and some others are looking at separating in terms of finances and activitiy from the american library association entirely.

The state of montana has voted officially to break off of the ALA, especially financially. The American Library Association is getting what's long overdue nad deserved, btu their justification is that they're doing so on the basis of the fact that their current leadership is openly Marxist, and that it violates one's duty as a state entity to do business with an organization that is Marxist in its orientation and leadership.

Lots can be said - the head of the ALA is a man named Emily Drabinsky - an openly Marxist Queer Theorist who said recently "Never in a million eyras did I think they'd give a Marxist a chance".

We have a wholly corrupt ALA. The American Library Association isn't just run my a Marxist and has lots of things going back over a decade in terms of manipulating how it catalogues books, it's also tied directly into (liek virtually everything else that's a fake professioanl captured organization) United Nations Agenda 2030 sustainable development goals. 

For example, here off the ALA website we found a task force on United Nations 2030 sustainable development goals. If yu look more closely, the ALA is, in fact, working in cahoots with a bigger organization called the International Federation of Library Associations, which is completely captured and working in concert with the United Nations and UNESCO.

So why are these weird books in our libraries? Because the ALA is a captured organization working under the direction fo a further captured organization.

There's absolutely no doubt on their website how much they're tired to the SDGs. They are completely consistent with the UN and WEF vision.

From Degroiter: "Libraries exist to serve the sustainable development goals. The UN is fully invested in return.". The UN website dedicated to the sustainable development goals has a libraries page and it describes the relationship with the International Federation of Library Associations.



# Consciousness and Evolution of Gospel of Marxism
## Cultural Marxism
Censored from Wikipedia and replaced with "Cultural Marxism Conspiracy Theory".
Critical Theory was not Marxism until Isaac Gottesman in 2016 said "The right name for it would be Critical Marxism". The goal there is to redefine the very terms and resurrect Utopia.

They were informed by a Cultural Marxist by the name of Gyorg Lukacs, who laid out a theory of consciousness to overcome the cultural milieu that people were in - the cultural Hegemony that kept people from becoming Marxists. 

He said you don't just have to give people the agitation of Marxist, you have to conscientize them. You have to make them have class consciousness.

In History and Class Consciousness.

The Critical Marxists obsessed about how to overcome False Consciousness with Critical Consciousness. Not just class, but the entire operation of society has to be brought into criticism.
This is because  the guy who named Critical Theory, thus began in essence critical marxism, max Horkheimer said that he conceived of the Critical Theory specifically because we can't describe a good society in the terms of the existing society. We have to question the terms of the existing society.

Tangential to this, a postmodern Marxist movement arose in France out of linguistic theories that were ultimately derived not just from Marxist thought, but also a lineage of Rousseauian thought. Rousseau -> Romanticism -> French Existentialism (despair/nihilism) -> Structuralism (study of how language conditions your reality) -> Post modernists (post structuralists) with more despair and Marxism (though they claim to reject Marxism, as this is a dialectical process) 

Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Jean Baudrillard

## Derrida
True post-structuralist because he said the structure of language reproduces the forms of power, so we have to rrethinkin the structure of language itself (creating a despairing and depondent theory of ho)