In a gesture of subservience, as one acts to offer the necessary cost for incurring a threat (even so little as an afternoon of discomfort), one meets a marvelous call to action, in the name of civility, through offering up the child. The state of the world could even be a fate worse than death, as it's thought that the suffering in the wild is palpably greater than those rare events which happened to someone else's child. As, you see, to leave it be would mean allowing an element of injustice alongside death already unescapable.

The adult mind, with its layers of neurological noise, sports a clumsily constructed structure of symbolic memory (though amazing and sophisticated, we can thankfully always do better). Unable to look back, one has assimilated a propensity to reinforce their sacrifices already made - a demonstration of the sunk cost fallacy - coupled with an evolved sense to acknowledge some form of community tax.

Higher learning makes this sacrifice mandatory for their campuses. Campuses already populated by the higher classes of society are potentiated with enhanced opportunity to observe additional, localized expressions of excluding other dwellers of the community.

We are deep in cognitive dissonance when discussing the potential of SARS-CoV2 transmission among youth.

Either one is fear mongering children into believing they are in grave danger whenever in the presence of any human (even the lowest risk group), or they are frightening them as threats to one another's loved ones. What might even be better is the capacity for educators and administrators to perceive their proximity to ripely passionate creatures, in their age of vigour, as an unreasonable risk.

We either have a message of the young sacrificing themselves for the old, or we have a message to fear that which should is least to be feared, which may oversensitize their fear in perpetuity.

To be broken down into fearing the lowest possible risk might irreperably fracture the mind, though some won't even complain (I hear they're the resilient ones)."

In a gesture of subservience, as one acts to offer the necessary cost for incurring a threat (even so little as an afternoon of discomfort), one meets a marvelous call to action, in the name of civility, through offering up the child. The state of the world could even be a fate worse than death, as it's thought that the suffering in the wild is palpably greater than those rare events which happened to someone else's child. As, you see, to leave it be would mean allowing an element of injustice alongside death already unescapable.

The adult mind, with its layers of neurological noise, sports a clumsily constructed structure of symbolic memory (though amazing and sophisticated, we can thankfully always do better). Unable to look back, one has assimilated a propensity to reinforce their sacrifices already made - a demonstration of the sunk cost fallacy - coupled with an evolved sense to acknowledge some form of community tax.

Higher learning makes this sacrifice mandatory for their campuses. Campuses already populated by the higher classes of society are potentiated with enhanced opportunity to observe additional, localized expressions of excluding other dwellers of the community.

We are deep in cognitive dissonance when discussing the potential of SARS-CoV2 transmission among youth.

Either one is fear mongering children into believing they are in grave danger whenever in the presence of any human (even the lowest risk group), or they are frightening them as threats to one another's loved ones. What might even be better is the capacity for educators and administrators to perceive their proximity to ripely passionate creatures, in their age of vigour, as an unreasonable risk.

We either have a message of the young sacrificing themselves for the old, or we have a message to fear that which should is least to be feared, which may oversensitize their fear in perpetuity.

To be broken down into fearing the lowest possible risk might irreperably fracture the mind, though some won't even complain (I hear they're the resilient ones)."