# Oh My Cron
Surely these people claiming that doom might be impending have some reason to feign ignorance. Do they imagine a neatly delineated point at which the new variant begins? And, if so, they believe it is noticeable at the point that they have begun measuring it?

New testing methodology? Well, then. What would previous tests have yielded? Negative? There is no reason to assume that therehaven't been cases for quite some time.

But the fact of the matter is that fewer than ever will still support it. You see, some of the always fully-compliant are sharing their first forms of dissent: "After my booster, I'm done!". You can imagine that such a person hasn't refused to comply to authority in their lifetime, so to see any expression of an expectation that they don't want to conform to the demands of the state or the state's favourite corporate companion is something worth celebrating.

Some of it is arguable getting more aggressive than one would have previously hoped, but when you see that police have begun to treat the vulnerable like dirt, you can see taht the value of human life is declining. And should we expect any different? A demand that you perform some action which places any kind of risk on yourself or your body is one which, without choice to say yes or no (under reasonable conditions) is not a proposal.

Oh, of course, you can refuse! Except you will be no longer be able to feed yourself or your family, so you will be forced to send your child to a school which provides food, but only if your child is fully jabbed. And you? You can keep your job, but only if you take the following drugs and perform the appropriate transformations.

Indeed, try to get one of them to explain the difference to qualify their position and they'll tell you that so many have already done so, and it's responsible to refer to them instead of doing an inferior job of it oneself. In fact, any effort to ask for anything more is akin to being against science, reason and good taste.

Why defend positions one doesn't wish to explain? Positions that obviously don't explain themselves well enough to satisfy. This sets and maintains an interaction and standard where things are not learned, but dictated.

And, so, who takes the position of the state? To what degree of support? How frequently is it not the case? Is it not done so implicitly with every acquiescence? Are they your mind? Are they your being? Your material?

Because, as we see here, the common theme is to say "Oh just do it already". If you do, that means you have agreed to more than you might realize.

This all follows the same pattern of eliminating objectivity. No longer must anything be proven, a process which makes all involved the wiser. No, on the contrary, your question tells us which answers you know and which ones you need to be corrected on. If you already held the correct opinions, no trouble would be necessary. Imagine what this does to a society whose entire previous workforce has been made to not be listened to.