So here's the situation

Many people believe Bill Gates might be driven by evil, or driven by the past. Driven by the skeletons in his closet, which manifested and were influenced, in unknown levels of significance, by his family. It seems, at the very least, that his family may have had an interest in eugenics. This was, of course, more commonplace, as the ideas had not been as far realized as they were throughout the 20th century, and had not yet proven themselves to be Universally rebuked, and held in contempt, if even just at a superficial level - we're not really in the day and age where difficult subjects are given comprehensive scrutiny. No, we're in the day and age where the most difficult subjects are conflated with the most difficult effects. To affect someone or a group of someones in a manner which can be deemed difficult, insofar as the spirit in which it is expected to be experienced, is not really the same thing as engaging something which is truly difficult, in the sense that to observe or reason about it, ask questions about it, and come to conclusions which answer these questions can be considered difficult.

I digress, but back to Bill Gates, this issue of his having a nefarious trait which might govern his decisions as pertaining to matters of global human health, and whether or not it is plausible to assume that it would be nefarious, in any degree, when considering certain coinciding facts, certain predicates of probability still to be fully evaluated, and how this relates to human personalities and the survivability of the species.

Whew, that's a lot of stuff to take in, so let's back up a little.

Bill Gates has experienced success, as can be measured in material wealth, economic participation, technological influence, and impact on human behaviour, especially with regards to how we work. Now, that's not to say that all humans are on a course of pursuing all of these things, or any one of these things, though it might be possible to assume that humans do pursue these things, even involuntarily, with the exception of some outliers (as usual..) But, it still needs to be taken into consideration when trying to produce even a modest contribution of conjecture worthy or thought provoking enough to be heard.

Well, does Money lead to happiness? Does material wealth, even as it exists to facilitate the engagement and participation, of a human being, in the activities or actions which are in line with the values of the being? 

Certainly, it does allow for an individual to have an easier time going about the activities