# Fascism ## Intro It is becoming fascism, a state of it, an attitude of it. It seems that many might even just demand it, having allowed themselves to believe that they are within a fortnight of losing their lives if just the wrong person exhales in the wrong place. But do they really believe that? Who are those who are most vocal about that sort of thing? ## Who Are they the most at-risk? Doubtful -> it is likely easier to predict the degree to which one is aggressively intolerant of unvaxxed purely from: - Media consumption (quantity, nature of programming) - Partisan affiliation - Workplace environment - Friends and family So, then it comes down to wondering which of the following best applies to them: 1. They are concerned for their loved ones 2. They feel a strong sense of community 3. They are egotistical and manipulative 4. They are predisposed to authoritarianism 5. They are predisposed to disgust sensitivity, hypochondria, anxiety 6. They are concerned that they will be rejected from the community if they don't appear to be respecting the community's requirements ## It's Not Fascism ### It's Not Far-Right The most simplistic breakdown of politics is the left-right paradigm. The problem with this means of formulating the political characistics is that the ideas do, indeed, seem to span off in opposing directions. But though the concepts might seem to be disparate at the surface, the systems they produce don't themselves offer any drastic differences either economically or socially, with both leaning towards an authoritarian system where asymmetric influence is enjoyed by corporations and the political families who facilitate influence by the corporate stakeholders. This lends itself to an oligarchical pattern which never fulfills the collectivist promises it alludes to, while also eroding the fundamental human rights which would otherwise act as a fail-safe against the tendency of systems to become tyrannical. ### Suppression of Opposition - Consolidated views between existing parties prevent opposition/dissenting views from proliferating in the political landscape - Corporate influence of all leading parties - Media corporations that have grown weaker and less influential are kept afloat through government initiatives. This has the consequence of biasing the media to present the incumbent party in an uncritical light. ### Regimentation of Society - The state enumerates and defines all aspects of society in a formalized manner which best befits the goals and ideology of the incumbent party. This is done to such an advanced degree that it supplants the independent values of the society's citizenry, presupposing that the value of their contributions can only be measured in accordance with the formal definitions laid out by the state. ### Nationalism - The state has, for many years now, been complicit in producing copious cognitive dissonance by both promoting ideologies which undermine nationalism, while also replacing definitions for universal values with ones which constrain formulation and participation in promoting these values through means which benefit the state and villify non-participation. ### Fascistic Leaders The bitter irony is ever so clear, as our leaders demand freedom for those subjected to tyranny outside of our local sphere of influence. Within our own homes, however, absolute obedience is demanded and any inclination to question or doubt is evidence to be used for your own subjugation. There is no respect for human reason, just a callous drive to assign you to a lower caste where your capacity to evoke change in the world is replaced with nothing more than a confined potential to serve them. Indeed, work will make you free, but only if you are so fortunate so as to be gifted the option to. HEADER: Fanatics are oppressing women and children in far away lands! HASHTAGS: covidism tyranny globalHegemony doubleStandards afghanistan taliban branchCovidians politicalIncumbency maskingChildren vaccinePassports PROMOTE: Does silence preserve you?