adaptation.md 1.2 KB
Adaptation
There is some misunderstanding as to why some might reject a particular therapy. It is assumed that the individual denies the utility that could be derived, or that the effect of the therapy is a net negative to one's vitality. This is not necessarily the case, however, as it could be assumed to be the following circumstances:
- Therapy elicits adaptation which produces measurable increasing in immunologically mediating / active resource.
- The side effects are nul or comparable -> measured as symptoms or toxic load on metabolism.
- The literature and consensus agree that the adaptation falls within a range which is understood to be significant and beneficial.
-> In spit of what seems like 100% benefit, the missing element is an agreed specification describing the optimal desired adaptation, as well as a proposed methodology to assess the degree of success for achieving that outcome. -> a set of possible side effects as well as a proposed range of verifiability for each.
Understanding of many phemonena seem to suggest a universal principle about physics and reality; our systems adapt to stimuli and the nuance of these adaptations does not have a limit of resolution, but a limit as to how well they can be perceived.