Useful_Discussions.md 1.8 KB
Discussions that could be so useful if only certain pitfalls were avoided.
That we could talk about deep values, methodologies, what actual transactions take place. Instead it is always the same representation of a walled institutional narrative which proclaims as though it has never spoken before. These narratives always miss the mark of conducting themselves in the locale of greatest interest, but that cul dbe forgiven if only it wasn't a shutting down of other inquiry.
In consideration of motifs that are deeply embedded in the human experience, a mere motif - That deserves disambiguation: ``` It's not enough to simply say that something injust occurred to one's ancestry. This is a neverending game no matter where it is played. So for this reason, we need to examine why and how these particular pursuits are coming into being. The mechanism, the rationale at a more semantically complex level, and then deliberate over the values being proposed. Instead, we get a relegation to assuming that people's experiences are different on the basis of an arbitrary characteristic, while also pretending experience to be equal in other circumstances. Relegating us, inevitably, into groups which facilitate a move towards what one might call a set of interesting names, all of which bearing a notoriety in disregard for human life. Both mortal measure and also by connection.
Nevertheless, we are kept from making such distinctions, and instead create unnecessary conflict in bad taste, and with some expense. So if there is a high resource requirement for proper conduct, an da high risk of insufficient conduct, then it becomes irrational to pursue. The proposition is so distasteful that even describing it sounds like an undesirable and irrational endeavour. How to rectify this? Is this to be rectified? What for?