It's a conspiracy
We live in a world of competing
It's always suggested that if you question any aspect, any details of what you're being told, then it follows that you are alleging a conspiracy, and to even step towards such a road, as framed by your critic, is sufficient evidence that you are a crazy person who shouldn't be listened to.
To be one who is willing to organize and analyze piecemeal bit by bit, and the reveal the manner of their thought, the findings of their research offends they who have an aversion to the idea of new knowledge. Repelled and unable to indulge or entertain the thoughts and ideas of their brethren, they who are unable to conceive of any reason why someone would wish to busy themselves with such concerns, or wonder why they would have thoughts and beliefs that would compel them to expend their resources -
no, there is no willingness to hear such madness to be heard, but there's ample time for the intolerant to speak and share their thoughts and feelings and experiences as though they were a whole, complete and bonafide human being, unlike their brethren who are, perhaps, nothing more than an illusion, a caricature with a broken mechanism that patters and sputters without emitting any intelligent pattern worth of time or attention.
The truth is that there needn't be any conspiracy. No conspiracy as to the reach protecting their possessions. No conspiracy to the rich depth of expression that can be embodied by humans. No conspiracy as to the mechanism of incumbency - it is logical to protect one's position. No conspiracy as to the need for business to maintain or exceed the transactions it has as its precedent. No conspiracy to the ego whose corresponding conception of identity risks incurring infinite despair if it fails to be propagated. No conspiracy as to the utility of categories and nomenclature in mustering and directing political power. No conspiracy in accepting short-term benefit of complacency in place of facing the wrath of calling everyone to what lies beyond their eyes.