Is it really just the case that one wishes to prevent someone from pushing the boundaries of what is normal, acceptable, and even true? That would be the first assumption, based purely on the fact of showing resistance to any proposal.
Is it a proposal for me, or for you? Is it really for something new? What of helping others?
A: The useless eaters are at it again. Not listening to instructions from their betters, those who are the only ones observant and intelligent enough to really see what the challenges are, and how we must all work to overcome them.
B: But the challenges must be self-evident. For if they are not, then any demand on our resources for your solution is, in fact, attempted theft. The fact of increasing any type of risk as a consequence of your prescribed solutions is a form of violence.
The fact of it having been remarked when observed before is enough to make it signify that one hasn't a sane mind if they are too allow it again.
A: No one is demanding, they are simply letting you know what choices you have available to you. You should feel fortunate that you have access to cloud computing, medical advice at the drop of a hat, and wonderful vaccines that work.
Really work? Unfortunately, those who support them are, in many cases, perfectly happy to accept temporary solutions that wane, as they:
- are used to the flu vaccine
- feel high anxiety about covid
- see an opportunity for activism