Choosing_Parts_of_Science.md 2.0 KB
Public Science
How do we chhoose what parts of science to keep in the public domain? Biology?
How to indicate a biological reality where comprehensivity and dynamic range and rate of change potentiate the most robust behaviours? It seems to be a natural law.
Digital vs Analog. Full potential vs narrow observation. Free and precise vs guided.
No. Connection with free expression allows for the widest range of potential. Systems bleed into one another, or the potentiated behaviours of one system yield a resilient structure, barrier or environment/environmental element in the terms of another system. What is an example of this? Gravity and navigation? Spinning to allow for gravity? We come to rely on and take for granted a property which is made possible because of another system that we may not be attentive of.
So, at this stage, how do we use this understanding? Well, to defend objectivity.
The postmodern academics claim that they need research to know more, but this means that they believe discovering more and quantifying more leads to a better understanding. Either because of a) improved technical capability (because of objective/scientific knowledge), or b) power to persons with group knowledge. Through group knowledge, one cannot be said to represent and aspire to attain scientific knowledge.
Even if you claim "science" of this culture or "scientists that are of this culture" it must be because of mystical osmosis of scientific understsanding if it has to do with their culture, because otherwise the steps and quantifiability thereof would have been independent, and something that is repeatable by anyone of any culture. Thus, to make any and claim of scientific understanding, even scientific benefit, to inclusion of a group is antiscience, because it assumes that science isn't enough on its own to lead us to improved understanding, but faith in the culture revealing reality, or mysteriously making reality better through immaterial influence. That doesn't hav to be a bad thing, but it needs to be called out for what it is