WhyWeStarted_WhatWeDo.md 4.8 KB
so why did we start this well we made a decision together what doe sthat mean? it means that we weren't exactly forced into it, that is to say, we all sort of played a part in expressing what we wanted and this was partly due to inaccurate or misleading information such as videos for which no clear explanation or description exists just random scary sequences of media that manipulate people as we all as some foregone conclusions about some of hte data coming out of china, including potential mortalit rate infection rate spread rate etc we thought that it probably couldn't ever come to the scale where everyne must worry at least that's what we were thinking initially but as t ime went on, the stories grew louder and stronger, and suddenly we were wondering when the first cases would hit in our locale, our surroundings, our environment, our country, our city, our neighbourhood, our place of work, and so on So we became resentful resentful that our loved ones might have to be exposed to a threat, all because their employer needed to keep their slave in their pocket needed to keep trying to make a profit needed to hound them to the door before they went to lock it okay i'm just rhyming there we were also resentful that anyone would have expectations about us which might expose us but no one was thinking about some of the most obvious things things for which we've received plenty of input over the past many decades, about immunization, about herd immunity, about approaches to dealing with pathogenic infections, pandemics, epidemics, and what have you the problem with such topics is that the most obvious parts of them are often not discussed making them a distant memory, or something forgotten or misunderstood in the case of immunology, it's the idea that we are actually responsible for it that is to say, our ability to remain immune, or the continue to live in spite of threats which might come or go, has to do with our immunological function that we have an immunological function is intrinsically linked to the human body that the human body is adaptive and able to make the necessary changes to meet the demands of a given moment to identify a predicate for change and to invoke the appropriate response this occurs because of our innate ability, which has developed through evolution over a long period of time therefore it might be taken for granted for many reasons actually the reason that we've had one is not necessarily a strong reason as to why we would have forgotten about it but the fact of the matter is that we have focused primarily on the ancillary and exogenously administered affectors which we hope and are told to believe will have a strong affect on the community, and our own individual health but the manner in which we verify these things has its limits, and that we are to be forced to believe something about it does make the human mind suspicious that we are discouraged from researching it, due to a tendency for humans to be incompetent, is also more unnerving, giving fodder to pursuit at some level In short, it would seem that the only focus on immunological preparation has been on vaccination, and therefore many are at a loss when considering how it is that they have an innate immune system, and how one might act or upon what to decide in order to sustain, potentiate and optimize their immunological function All this time, we could have been disseminating the appropriate messages about how to nourish oneself what critical nutrients might cause one to not have an immunological function which is operating at optimal levels and what the difference is between a reactive, or hyperactive immunological function, or the normal behaviour and operations of an innate immune system which deals with many threats without necessarily bringing to light the details of what it is doing, at least not to a degree which is unignorable I'm not sure if there is one, it's fairly complicated just as it stands NO So we know we made a decision together, because of our need to react to the unknown threat, and also because of scary information which seems to have not been completely accurate or, moreover, not information that should be considered trustworthy now the fact that youtube acts as though untrustworthy information might always have been and always will continue to be considered as being trustworthy, is a cause for concern youtube is a private company, but it is the primary source of media for individuals who are not receiving all of their media from Television and it has received pressure from organizations, including government, to utilize force in order to remove content which mgiht be considered inappropriate for a range of reasons, some or many of which might seem to suggest conflicts of interest in terms of what the government's interests might be the fact that they seem to be exit