Queer Education is Evil.md 4.6 KB
Queer Education is Evil
From an essay on "Queer Education is Child Abuse".
Introduction
The statement we are looking at is:
"Is it true that queer education and queer theory is something about LGB people?" Is it really about these sexual kids and trying to figure out what to do so they don't kill themselves or have a rought childhood.
No, queer theory has nothing to do whatsoever with LGB anything. The T is informed by the Q, but the LGB part has nothing to do with queer theory and, in fact, they are oppositional to one another. This lie needs to be broken because the Queer Marxists are hiding behind the LGB people as human shields, holding them out. Any backlash which comes out will appear to be against good and normal gays, lesbians and bisexual people, while the marxists get to use them as the excuse to do the things which caused the backlash in the first place.
The essay that we are to publish is a slight expansion of a statement read in the Georgia legislature.
"Queer theory, which nearly all of the gender and sexuality education in America is ultimately based upon (Comprehensive Sexuality Education, the Gender bread and all of the gender ideology comprehensive sex education and so on is based in Queer Theory). It has nothing to do with LGBT education. This is evident to anyone who reads it, not only because its goals are diametrically opposed to LGB acceptance and normalization in society, but because they say so themselves specifically over and over again in their literature".
When I say its goals are diametrically to LGB acceptance and normalization, the problem is acceptance and normalization. Queer theory depends on the idea that people who identify as queer are in resistance to normalization and acceptance. They are not to be normalized and accepted, but to be radical - in resistance to anything considered normal.
Homonormativity
You have the concept heteronormativity, where they say that everything is normatively arranged around heterosexual relations in society.
This similar concept does not mean that society is organized around the normalization of homosexuality, but that society is accepting or considering that homosexuality is a part of the range of normalcy. It is considered a problem - homonormativity is not a goal in queer theory, but a problem - a problematic, more specifically.
So the goals of queer theory, as we'll hear in their own words, are diametrically opposed to LGB acceptance in society. Further, they actually tell you that it's not the same thing - if you read any of their literature, you find that there is a distinct difference spelled out again and again between Gays and Lesbians as people and Queer Theory which is about how people become political activists.
Drabinsky
Emily Drabinsky is the openly politically queer and marxist president of the American Library Association. In 2013 she wrote a paper "Queering the Catalogue" where she writes: "Queer Theory is distinct from Lesbian and Gay studies. Where Lesbian and Gay studies takes gender and sexual identities as its object of study, queer theory is interested in how those identities come discursively and socially into being and the kind of work they do in the world".
"Lesbian and Gay studies is considered with what homosexuality is, Queer Theory is concerned with what homosexuality does".
The openly queer, openly marxist president of the ALA in a paper about bringing Queer Theory into American Libraries, including School libraries, explains that Queer Theory and LGBT studies are not the same thing but fundamentally different subjects.
When Drabinsky refers to "The kind of work" they do when referring to Queer identities what she means is nothing less than activism. Queer is not about who you are - it is, by definition, an explicitly and intentionally activist identity, which means it's not an identity at all but a political stance.
Queer Identities don't exist - Queer is a political stance - it is not a fact of who someone is. In fact, that means it's not an identity at all, but a political position. This is by definition in Queer Theory as David Halperin defined "Queer" in the first place in his 1995 book titled "St Foucault: Toward a Gay Hagiography". A few pages from a rousing discussion on a rousing discussion of the transformative potential of anal-fisting as an ideal sex act, David Halperin defined the difference between gay and queer and defined queer as follows:
"Unlike gay identity which, though thoroughly proclaimed in an act of affirmation, is nontheless rooted in the positive fact of homosexual object course, queer identity need not be grounded in any positive truth or in any stable reality. Qu