They change their methods at their whim, and then they claim they have proof of our mortal limitations which perfectly cinclude that we should have faith in them. You will be safer, but only if everyone else has followed suite and done the very same as you. Otherwise, you are not safe, nor are those who should have listened. If only they had the courage to undergo discomfort, or the intelligence necessary to be afraid.
It's not that they are too stupid, but that they listen to persuaders, and they are still not exceptionally intelligent ( they are adequate, just not as high as one who does as I), such that they are able to defend themselves from trickery.
Did we say "Lie with Statistics"? That was a joke, I promise. In fact, I only read it to make sure that I never lie and teach others not to as well. Of course, the real lie is to live a life helpless and unable, which is why I can use lesser lies in my uncovering of truth.
Who is left to be persuaded? What do they need?
Some have been complacent in ignoring aspects of the narrative coupled with suspicions brought on by their own good sense, all the while complying and expecting a timeline of normalcy that might, as an administrative nuissance, be delayed.
They find, however, that as time goes on, the benefits of tehir compliance are not noticeable, and that the for mof resolution they had in their mind becomes increasingly difficult to specify, slurring into an indistinct blur that is the place o trickery -> a place where acts done for one reason have also been done for the pleasure of some entity.
That they haven't this ability, or haven't the proper and sufficient ability, then we are one acting with the intrinsic assumption that their own agency and direct expression needn't be an integral part of them performing actions which they truly want to perform. Like the embittered pearent who lives vicariously through their child, we cannot say that it is an act of altruism and benevolence.
The question must be posed: Might these assumptions about others be made as a consequence, not of love, empathy and concern, but out of fear? Might som ebe afraid to live in a world where all the outliers are not made to be conforming to the norm? Where they haven't been given ample assurances that in the event of the most unpredictable of all actions will be controlled, and they will be given poorly described explanations and illustrations.
Control is difficult, yes,