stuffs.md 3.7 KB
the mss]pppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppso it changs the standard surrounding the privacy we expect to be allowed the standard by which we allow ana uthority to get into one's body and this stnadard effects all other aspects of ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss so here we go let's contie the strea we wanted to talk about the fact thatwe are changing standards affecting how we preceive human pives the rights which we believe are in herent to all humans which should be expected for all humans which must be requested as a matter of dignity to huamns which should be expected out of respect for thos ewho have suffered a fate where they no longer had complete authonomy over their boillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll the idea is that those who do not vaccinate are not treating their fellow humans with dignity and respect thta they are knowingly absconding from participating in a process which benefits vulnerable people which reduces the chance of covid spread but this has not been proven... and that this is one's responsibility to be deemed as a person fit for society as a person who is worthy of participating in liberal society in a dignified society but participation in society should be limited to thsoe who are willing to take the necessary steps to preserve it to ensure that society is able to maintain itself, to propagate forward but this manner of thought itself holds its own set of assumptions and expects that this society is propagating somehow on its own, and that the humans who wish to be a part of it prove themselves worthy of it or can be left to expire without it the society, however, is composed of those humans and that it could be considered civil or dignified is not something that can be fundamentally proven on the basis of whether its members have successfully abided by its eternal tenets fundamentally what is dignified are the transactions between the members of that society, and the moment we are choosing to exclude transactions without allowing them to run their course, is the moment that we are being undignified the society is dignified because of the standards expected for each individual if there is a matter which is contentious, and if matters of contention are growing in significance, then what do we assume about it? is it that the Russians have tweaked a few too many minds? is it that some groups of humans have become too unintelligent to keep up with the rest? is it that one group of humans wishes ill upon the other, and are doing their best to stay in proximity to their rivals? their objects of hate? or is it, perhaps, that the matters are complex enough such that actions predicated upon them can be concluded in the simplest terms with the least effort to disambiguate with no regard for the nuance of perspectives which have culminated into contention? no society can remain dignified while also allowing for such behaviour to become more commonplace the society is failing, and is choosing courses of action which are increasingly less dignified and though technology and a buffer of resources might bring about the appearance of a society in its most dignified form, if the potential for resolving the contention within its participants is eroding, then dignity will die, and humanity along with it