trump_rebut.md 5.5 KB
why might you have received attention from people that was only because of your privilege and status, tied to your ancestry and skin colour? is it because of the expectation that you have more to offer or that, because of your privilege, you might have accrued something useful, sort of like collecting a tax from anyone less privileged and so when people see you when they observe you and take notice of you they're thinking about all the wonderful wealth and fun nights that they might be able to share and enjoy with you because surely exit
exit okay so let's let the flow continue get those thoughts out every idea counts or it has the potential to but it's up to you to make sense of them and try to direct them towards a worthwhile purpose people have questions.. they're wondering why you could believe in something so obscene, but what do they really know about what you believe it is actually their own projected beliefs which consists of af ew things for one, in order for them to rationalize that which they believe, they need to assume that their own beliefs are worthwhile and held for values that would stand the test of scrutiny, should such scrutiny be sought and, that they believe they hold a different opinion from you forces them to assume that, if their own opinion is held for good values, your opinio nis either held for bad values or it is held because of a false belief regarding the semantics necessary to hold that belief, or a false belief concerning what the values are supporting that belief in the case of the trumpster, it's mostly just the same high level, generic narrative drivel which I've been so fortunate to have beheld time and time again it doesn't actually inspire thinking or a deep analysis, it's mostly just akin to "oh the failure has been the worst failure ever, and it's every type of failure imaginable at the same time, making it worse inf act you can prove how terrible it is by the fact that it's every possible failure, to the utmost degree, at all possible times, and that it's such a massive list of monstrous failures means that we can't even contend with describing it, because it would be impossibly time consuming and thorough and since it's so obvious that it's such a monumental failure, it would be an insult to intelligence, sensibilities and the respect of our precious time and resource sto even suggest that we should scrutinize these things the sensible, gentlemanly, civilized, progressive and most appropriate thing to do would be to completely ignore the details and just all agree that it' sso awful, so terrible, so downright insufferable that we can take for granted that it possesses the values as we have described of course, there's a huge problem with this manner of thinking, nad no one needs to actually point it out, or atleast we shouldn't have to point it out but often it is the case that we never point out the most obvious truths, the most obvious issues or the most glaring holes which need to be filled in this case, let's avoid falling into that trap and actually think about the points being posited and what supporting evidence there might exist for each of these and the quality and range of evidence available Race failure well this is a discussion for which much of the common parlance has been satiated with a poison well there's obviously the trope of the fine people hoax, and there's a continuous effort to destroy race relations from all sides that we can have less division by compelling that division exists, that it can be observed by obvious means, and that the predicates for the division are on the basis of believing that there has been fear of understanding the other, and that the other can be determined through attributes which separate the groups at a superficial level, means hta twe necessarily speak of the divison by further dividing it's only at the point where we begin to believe that these divisions don't exist along those superficial lines, and that we can rise above it by thinking in a different way, that we'll start to make progress until that time, we're stuck in a sort of loop but with technological appendages which make the gravety of the consequences of the interactions and behaviours of such a loop become increased this is a huge problem as it leads to an increased chance of more widespread destabilization which can affect us all the next has to do with the public health measures and htis is mostly predicated on what exactly that Trump told people to drink bleach? well I don't think anyone who actually believes that even watched the conference where he made the statement which lead to the reports of him having suggested this his suggestion sounded a bit dumb, but he wasn't asking people to drink bleach, and technically speaking, using oxidizers internally is a common occurrence in medical facilities, especially when critical surgeries and cleanup are being performed the other has to do with economic, but that we separate the behaviour of one person who is participating in the same trends which are occurring everywhere is a bit strange all of the countries are performing crazy bailouts and we can't even talk about how the mone yis being spent, because we don't know the overall usage yet, or what the consequence of the usage actually is it's likely, and we all expect this, that the money is being wasted, and that's probably true so that each leader supports the wasting of money but we are only to criticize the orange man is a void of depth and insight.. it isn't very logical, and it seems to be a continuation of partisan thinking Not really the best way forward exit