accountability_of_risk.md 1.3 KB
So, to summarize our little argument
I am arguing that it's not a matter of asking people to take on risk, because they are already forcing others to take on risk. How are they doing this?
How is it an explicit action of them forcing others to take on risk? Well, it's quite simple -> they are failing to perform the most reasonable action. It's reasonable, because they are being given all of the appropriate information, and that information indicates that the answer is really simple for them to deduce. Thus, if they do no deduce that answer, it's out of wilfull ignorance. Wilfull ignorance is not a sufficient excuse to claim that they are not responsible for the increased risk they have forced others to be subjected to, therefore there needs to be some degree of accountability.
That accountability is going to be realized by forcing these individuals to be excluded from some aspects of society, so long as they truly have the opportunity to realize their mistakes, and this occurs through our dialogue. Furthermore, their exclusion from society is always improving their and other people's health. Since they are more vulnerable to disease, this helps to isolate them / socially distance them from others who, as we know, are either more protected, but still spreading, or aren't protected, and are liable to spread even more // TODO: nope