DenisRancourt - Bioweapon.md 3.2 KB
Is It a Bioweapon?
Adverse effects we're seeing are absolutely horrendous and then there's the research you're doing on all-cause mortality. What are your thoughts on the subject of whether these vaccines are bioweapons?
This is a political question and it asks for a political answer. I don't mean that my opinion will be pressured by politics - I mean that this is a political question.
I personally, with my experience and my looking at this phenomenon and my understanding of geopolitics and so on - I do not believe that the injections themselves are a bioweapon. My position is that it's the ability to vaccinate the entire population - roll out vaccines how you want and when you want - that is the military application, here. The military wants to be able to inject things into your arm whatever they want when they want and they are perfecting a way to convince you to - they are perfecting the mechanism whereby they can inject everyone when they want.
I think that is an important military objective - something useful to the military - it's useful because you can decide to make certain populations weaker where there's more trouble. You can also inject an antidote if you believe someone else has a bioweapon that they're putting out - you can put out an antidote to your own population and so on. The military wanted to do this, and it's clear that it's a military operation - and I think that it's the campaign that is military - but the injection, I don't see any evidence that it could be a bioweapon.
They have this idea, this project, with the lipid nanoparticles and a technology for putting things into your body, and so on, but it would be very easy to kill people if they wanted to and they wouldn't have to do it in such a round-about and - I'm sure they have the technology to make a lot of people die from cancer, for example, and you would never know - you wouldn't even have to be talking about vaccines or anything.
I don't believe that the vaccines themselves are a bio-weapon and even the rates of fatality that I am calculating are not that great. I mean, it's horrendous when you're thinking about a medical treatment. But in absolute numbers, 0.2% of the world population has been killed up to now from the vaccines. Most of those people were elderly - a great majorty - because it's exponential by age - which means that you did not harm anyone's economy, their ability to fight, their ability to develop engineers or anything like that.
You have killed vulnerable, elderly people - 0.2% of the world population. So, I don't think it's a bioweapon.
They could choose to inject a bioweapon if they wanted to, and the other thing is that you don't inject a toxic substance that is non-discriminant into your own population and into everybody.
I still believe that geopolitics is real and that the nations are the fundamental blocks and, even though there are elites that are crazy and want all kinds of things and feel threatened by large population and they might fantasize about depopulation, but I just don't think it's a bioweapon. That's my own opinion at this stage, and I'm open to having my mind changed, but right now I don't see evidence that it could be a bioweapon itself.