Against Woke Marxism, Corporatism, Communism, Corporatist Communism? If you're against this monstrosity largely championed from the left, you need to understand:
Virtually every statement is a provocation to engage in a dialectical attack. Bait. Bait into a dialectical trap
A rhetorical device to get you to argue so that you'll argue on behalf of something that they're framing. This is:
You argue about the content while they have an operation based on the fact that an argument will emerge. They wish to achieve something based off of the reaction and argument cycle that comes out of the provocation. If you don't react, they can't move.
If you make a magnetic field go around a wire, a current will run perpendicularly along the wire. They need the argument to spin because it changes the understanding of terms and concepts over time.
This is also referred to as Political Catnip.
You've gone on an Instagram and stolen pictures. You send these pictures to people baiting them into sending you something back. They feel like they need to reciprocate, but the only thing you sent to them was something stolen.
Leftists are not invested in the arguments they're putting out in order to provoke you. It's not a lack of facts for people setting dialectical traps. They're doing so to cause the argument, to bait you in, etc.
Everytime you see a provocative statement about something big and relevant politically from a left-wing agitator - if you see a provocative statement scenario, you need to have the slack to be able to
What argument is it trying to trick me into having how can they use that argument to advance an agenda If you don't get strategic about this they're going to get you over and over again. Right wing people step into virtually every trap that's set for them. Arguing about the grounds for self-defense, the true history of the 2nd amendment, etc. The activists/cmmunists don't care. They only care that you're going to argue, knowing that eventually a body of argument is going to be built that they can use to hang you with.
The more you argue with the content, the more vigorously, the more likely they are to do that. They get you to argue something that sounds horrible - argue in defense of your right to massacre people in defense of the 2nd amendment like an idiot. Now all people who support the 2nd amendment are only interested in massacring people.
Or you say perfectly sane things and some other person logs in who migh tbe a crazy person, sock puppet, bot, or an activist on a burner, and they'll say some extreme thing for you to get lumped into. Especially if you do something idiotic, like liking their stupid comment.
They use that to whip up their base - keeping you busy, wasting your time arguing about something and using the most extreme respones to whip up their base and validate their positions and actions. Vote people into power and demand from those in power to take away people's right to self defense, right to freedom of speech, etc.
What you really have to do is you have to NAME THE DYNAMIC
When being manipulated: dialectical attack, DARVO, cry-bullying, wound-collecting. Whenever in a conversation/dialog with someone that's going off the rails - Stop, Back up, Name the dynamic.
Say what's happening. You can't manipulate me. This is your manipulation and this is how it works.
Robert Reich wants me to argue about what the correct necessary legal or philosophical limits to the 2nd amendment are so they can generate responses used to motivate people to take away the right to self-defense. This is what you're doing and this is how it's manipulative and we're rejecting it. We're not doing it.
If you are up to scratch to doing this, you need to do it everytime. There are only a few things to do for deaing with woke agitations:
Rather than arguing in a satisfying way and chewing it out, wasting your day instead of doing something productive (touching grass, even), they steal that from you and keep you busy slightly sharpening your arguments. They'll create the argument to scare their base to advance their power agenda. You are in the wizard's circle and you are lost as long as you are arguing the substance of their issue.
Magnets in a circle, horizontally spun around a wire The wire runs vertically
The direction of political movement is along the wire. Their goal is to get you to spin the magnets which creates the reflexive argument which makes it seem like a big deal in order to generate political energy.
What you need to do is to get up above the goal and cut the wire. Get on top of it and block it from going up. They want it to look contested and you're giving it to them. You need to state: this is where things are going and I reject it.
What are they sucking you into? Why are they trying to suck you into it? Which right or value is being targeted for destruction?