Random.md 48 KB
Businesses
How lovely, that the businesses putting their finger in the wind to see whether to go along with the vaccine passports are the also the ones who jump onto the opportunities to call themselves victims, while seemingly being run by upper middle class narcissists. They benefit from this media opportunity, by catering to an audience that has a higher predisposition to go along with mainstream narrative, garnering some of their sympathy, and enjoying some of the promotional effects of having their story distributed. It doesn't make matters any better that the people writing the story also seem to be of the same ilk.
So, who is the real victim? The people running the business, or the people who are discriminated against for reasons that are still being debated to this day, but not in a light of public discourse that is accepted by the government and media? Certainly the "victims" are those who are denounced, neglected, and despised in what is presented as popular discourse by the corporate state media.
Anxious Wannabes
Anxious wannabes of high society accept sales pitch to fashionably work from home and feel dramatic pity for themselves at the expense of untold horror across the world.
CRT Is History
Teaching CRT is just teaching history? That the description of the world through the eyes of the most intolerant and uncharitable perception ever humanly possible can just be broadly accepted as being or making factual historical references without bias is an insane idea, or an idea that hasn't been given much thought. It's easier to avoid thinking about the issue and just say that: "Well, there's been a historical problem, so we might as well just allow for some sort of solution to be proposed. If it's not the perfect solution, that's fine because in time we will have a better solution, because things improve or, at least, it seems that things improve over time, because societies improve."
Isn't that interesting, then, that we speak of how we need to fix society; that the state is insufficient, lacking, unsatisfactory, unacceptable, and therefore must be addressed now. We need to have this solution because, otherwise, things are even less acceptable. But the state of affairs is one which we also presume is better, because we expect that as time goes on, society is improving, thus our imperfect solutions are ones to be admitted because they are instantiated within a process which keeps improving.
I don't think that's enough to qualify that the problem is so great that we need a new solution. Isn't the fact of society having been improving one which can be demonstrated with respect to the lives of those whom we deem as being, in this case, those that are insufficiently served by society? If their situation is improving, do we want to break that process and hope that it improves things even more, or faster, because of the instantiation of something new which is said to be for a more specific or refined purpose?
It would seem that this makes sense at the surface; but what if the solution itself also contributes values which are antithetical to the optimal solution? What if they don't serve to improve the situation whatsoever, but just allow us to believe that we have added an additional feature which makes improvement in the name of something which we believe needs to be addressed? It would seem that we can look at this many ways, but given the nature of the topic, the conversation, the subject at hand, and the implications of morality, many have an increased incentive to forego talk of those details and to just accept it at the surface, without having to really do the work of understanding what this produces and what the logical conclusions sought are going to be if we utilize it.
This is intellectual laziness, and it's not replaced by posing oneself as intellectually astute solely on the stipulation that one accepts this new solution. A new solution means a new idea: something not previously known and something which is being given attention now, but only by those who have a mind that is able to recognize the value before others are taught to understand it.
There are many paths to intellectual laziness here. But how about acknowledging the difficulty in taking a stand and demanding that it not be utilized if one believes that it does harm, or is more regressive than it is progressive? That it is detrimental and destructive, anti-human, and anti-existence. That it demands we support the notion that existence is not good enough, and that we must seek even superficial and symbolic gestures which focus on the misery while denying progress made.
If, in fact, we are to deny the progress as it currently stands, and demand this new apparatus without giving it a rigorous analysis, then it's because the state of things, as they are, are unacceptable. Or it's because one is willing to allow for great harm to be produced, even for the aesthetic of a new artifact, because it can still serve one in some way. For most, it doesn't serve them much at all, or it serves them casually in some limited way, which doesn't seem to incur much cost. But this is simply laziness.
For others, it serves them so greatly that they choose to make it part of their purpose, and they pursue it while it makes them miserable. The pursue it while it destroys the world, and causes them to believe that they are gaining power. In this regard, it is evil, and it is somethign which needs to be identified and stopped.
Man Becomes Gordy
Man becomes God. God is replaced by its own creation. God is improved upon, as that which was created by God was improved by itself. That which was created by God was imperfect and designed to suffer for no good reason. That which was created by God is evidence of God's malevolence, and the true justice of reality occurs when God's creation conjures the means to transcend its limitations and correct the aspects of reality which were the evidence of God's malevolence.
Ascension
Path of Ascension
A class war? Une nouvelle aristocratie?
Imitators enqueue themselves for the chance to be enslaved.
Invited by pop culture, they have seen the glamour and virtue that lays consequent to their rite of passage. They've witnessed the illustration of a most noble identity - an identity which was descirbed to them as one having endured pain and suffering. A victim which triumphed over its victimhood. A character who has really accomplished something great.
States are guided by corporations as they promise the return of freedom. They market the perception that participation rewards one with special privileges only reserved for the new aristocracy - a higher society with all the enhancements and resources that should be expected of a successful and advanced society.
Corman
Corman Drosten PCR Protocol
- Submitted 21st of January, 2020
- Manuscript rushed through approval by Eurosurveillanc
- Had been sent to WHO before submission for review
- Dr. Simon and Naomi Wolf discuss the rushed peer review process of the Drosten paper (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AiTQt-Znzk)
- Corman-Drosten review report: https://cormandrostenreview.com/addendum/
Book
Book of human Development
Math -> to make sense of abstraction and intuit the difference between provable, objective claims and otherwise History -> insight into change possible on a cultural level Strength -> Adaptation and growth Music -> Epitome of human performance, the great tribute of gratitude to existence. -> is there a visual analog? Tension, rhythm, melody Must read music to think about and write ideas without instrument and indirection
Fear of Reality
From my anecdotes, what is it that these people are afraid of? More detail than simply chaos vs order.
Stef -> fear of not being accepted by his mother Mano -> fear of being powerless
Book Research / Theory
Improvisation patterns -> study of perception / awareness. Cognitive biases surrounding one's ability to see all patterns when increasing depth of development an dmastery within a particular domain.
As we increase our knowledge base, expand our toolset and refine our skills within a domain, we naturally assume we are able to have a more complete perception of what the domain consists of and this is of course natural and reasonable. What is the limit, however, of our ability to infer new patterns from old ones, when operating in "automatic" exploratory mode?
We must become prone to configuring our mode of being in this mode, as our confidence increases and it becomes less costly to make observation from this mode. When improvising, we rely upon embedded learned patterns to make deductions about the possibilities readily available, choose from them and then utilize them as fundamental building blocks for patterns which are occurring or manifesting at another level of abstraction. We hope to reach a level of perceiving all fundamental structures and organizing their use in a manner which best demonstrates the beauty of sound, while also expressing and conveying the field of being of the improviser or composer.
To what degree are we able to infer "missing" patterns which were not explicitly studied, practiced and internalized?
What role does complexity play? What is the limit? Is it based on physical reproduction? If we the mental has a larger capacity, is there a limit there? Is the limit conceivable given what we understand about physical invocation of sound? Complexity of instrumentation in symphonic sound?
Are there drawbacks to complexity of internalized patterns, such that an emphasis on them renders the mind less able to perceive fundamental, more universal patterns?
Book
Break the cycle
We fall victim to our belief systems, and it allows us to be continuously manipulated.
We need to understand our biology in the context of our physical Universe, and use this knowledge to control our psychology.
We have, as evidence of the pitfalls of allowing human society to run amok, the neverending archetypal conflicts which result in Collectivist vs Individualist clashes in society.
Ultimately, only one of these can be morally correct, and it can only be proven to each individual because of their experience.
Timbre
I've always paid attention to the timbre of each sound and the fact that each sound emitted from a particular object is not consistent in that it won't appear to sound the same in all settings.
The timbre of the sound is due in large part not to the frequency of its fundamental pitch, but the relationships of the composite pattern of pitches evoked as a culmination of factors including its material composition, the harmonic series, and the setting in which it resonates.
When observed by a human, the sound produces an event with a distinct expression and that expression, when compared to a subsequent observation of seemingly identical conditions, will never yield an identical replication. The uniqueness of states of matter exists at infinite levels of abstraction away from that whereupon society focused to attempt to describe it.
Though we may be consumed by some scope of analysis, the most fundamental structure of reality and its transformation likely has more in common with a symphony, the relationships of tones illustrating a nature composed of expressions.
I wouldn't be surprised if the state of the world were composed of the expressions of our conscious experiences. In that sense, things are always as they should be.
Static Reality
Change - The Could there be a static reality? Could there be an existence which does not flow? A snapshot of being? A structure without time? The static state is a state of stagnation and does not lead to resolution. Such an existence would be impossible to be observed. Such a Universe would be completely without understanding. There could be nothing to understand of it, for within it there could never be a concept of understanding. No movement, no change. No ability to fulfill obligations of understanding. What is there to understand for there to be something that could be understood? Nothing that could go from a state of misunderstanding, or lack of understanding, to having knowledge, realization, observation, acknowledgment. No movement from not understanding to understanding. No deduction. No movement to infer what can or cannot be reached. No change of state to have realization of the possibility that something could be known, or not known. No change to understand that a bit is filled or not filled. That a logic state is true or false. Even in a static state wherein a bit is filled, its being filled begs the question of whether it could have not been filled. Whether there could have been a state in which it was thought that this bit would be filled, could become filled, has always been filled, or could ever be such that it should not be filled. The possibility of understanding the state as it is is itself a modulation. To even prompt the acknowledgment that a state is such as it is is itself a deviation from the static state. The fact that something could be always brings about the question of whether it could not. This is that potential for movement, this is evidence of temporal dimension. No unchanging state could be recognized as a potential for being, because the question of potential is itself a changing state of being. A self-fulfilling prophecy, an acknowledgment of a temporal existence. The potential of anything creates a structure for what it is, suggests its structure in our field of representation. We realize that in order for there to be potential of being, there is itself a state of being and, thus, to say it could ever be unchanging is impossible. The potential for change is inherent in the structure of being itself, inferring a dimension more fundamental. Potential as a temporal expression.
Snapshot of Being
A snapshot of being absent the concept of resolution. Such an existence would be impossible to be observed. No movement, no change. No ability to fulfill obligations of understanding. Nothing that could go from a state lacking understanding, to observation, acknowledgment. No movement to understanding. No movement to infer what can or cannot be reached. No change of state to realize the possibility that something could be known, or not known. No change to understand that a bit is filled or not filled. That a logic state is true or false. Even in a static state wherein a bit is filled, its being filled begs the question of whether it could have not been filled. Whether there could have been a state in which it was thought that this bit would be filled, could become filled, has always been filled, or could ever be such that it should not be filled. The possibility of understanding the state as it is is itself a modulation. To even prompt the acknowledgment that a state is such as it is is itself a deviation from the static state. The fact that something could be always brings about the question of whether it could not. This is potential for movement, and evidence of temporal dimension. No universal unchanging state could be recognized as a potential for being, because the question of potential is itself a changing state of being. A self-fulfilling prophecy, an acknowledgment of a temporal existence. The potential of anything creates a structure for what it is, suggesting it in our field of representation. Realizing potential of being is itself a state of being and, thus, to say it could ever be unchanging is impossible. The potential for change is inherent in the structure of being itself, necessitating a most fundamental dimension.
Potential as a temporal expression.
Existing Being
Existing State of Being
The Stereotypical conception of physical vs spiritual tends to imagine the physical as our currently lived mortal life in a human body, and the spiritual as that which is associated with an eternal life which is fully realized after the mortal life has ended. That is, living in the mortal form doesn't necessarily preclude one from engaging with or incurring consequence to the spiritual world, but one does not exist as an expression of being that is exclusively spiritual except when there is no expression of being that is not spiritual, thus the spiritual and the physical are clearly separated in that way.
The Christian Science way of looking at things has tended to declare stories of the Bible as allegory, and to claim that the afterlife could not be known to be something eralizable through mortal thinking. That there is no reason to believe it exists or that it doesn't exist. In that sense, it stands to reason that any separation of physical and spiritual cannot really be understood to be real or relevant, except on the basis of a synthetic conception as to the nature and composition of the spiritual.
The physical may very well be spiritual expression which fulfils any or all or none of the known frameworks for spiritual understanding. So where does that leave one's understanding of matter? Some spiritual frameworks of thought (SFT) may recommend or make clear a fundamental axiom and value or goal of ridding oneself of any material desire or expectation for the purpose of being aligned with or affecting or being affected by the spiritual, and this creates a great conundrum. That is, there are obvious reasons for conducting thought from a human body, such as to acnowlege and to some degree take for granted the physical nature of our observed universe. And this is not just for one's personal survival. and direct benefit, but even in respecting the existence of all expressionf oe bign as can be seen in material form s(human and animals, for example). Thus there is a moral basis and impetus for recognizing and respecting knowledge about teh physical.
Where does one make a opint of demarcating between these two? Or does one even need to make this distinction?
Behold
Behold, the defiled and debased symbol of.. what, exactly?
I would love to see the Venn diagram of those who supported destruction of statues throughout 2020, and those who refer to any pro-freedom attendance within the proximity of this monument as defacement and desecration. Do they overlap perfectly? It's possible.
Downtown Ottawa is the best winter festival Ottawa has ever had (does anyone even go to Winterlude anymore?)
OttawaOccupation OttawaSiege TruckersForFreedom TruckersForFreedom2022 FreedomConvoy2022 Covidism Authoritarianism Totalitarianism
Dance for freedom
Have you ever seen anything so horrible?
Attractive health
It's attractive, almost irresistable, to come upon information about human health, a new understanding as to what risks we face, the degree to which we had mistaken the precariousness of our own lives, and pronounce it to the world, be it brazenly and broadly with blunt regard, or with care and tact to one's trusted compatriot.
It is one thing to understand one's motivations for doing so, but quite another to understand what one reveals about oneself when blinded by one's own haughty methods.
Observing
as things are from what one observes the world has become tremendously dangerous
terrorist, wars, the divisions, racial divisions, some dictators who want to destroy the world religious separation ecological crisis, economic problems
problems seem to be multiplied more and more
so what's the future of man?
What's the future of not only the present generation, but the coming generation?
Very grim
If you were quite young, and I was quite young, what would we do? Knowing all of this? What would be our reaction? What would be our life? Our way of earning a livelihood and so on?
Would I go into science again? And i'm not at all certain now, because science does not seemt o be relevant to this crisis
On the contrary, they are helping (the problem)
So what would you do? I think I would stick to what you are doing.
But there are several problems, of course, I don't know if you want to discuss them, a person just starting out he has to earn al iving, right? Not as many opportunities now and most of them are in jobs that are very limited
knowing that the future is grim, very depressing, dangerous, and so uncertain
Mask For Others
Masking up for others?
The mask brings an opportunity to hide vulnerabilities innate to our physical form. That we are accountable to the actions of teh body is an intrinsic consequence of the ability for one to be identified. Repeating the ritual of suppressing the that ability also ambiguates one's experience, conception of self, and conception of reality as a whole.
The human face is an interface through which it's plausible that the densest data can be exchanged, as not only does it rapidly provide a path to large sets of metadata, but also provides a dynamic and continuous stream of output containing potent indicators of emotive and physiological state heavily impacting the context of environment and probabilities of an ever-changing set of outcomes.
As we alter the standard of social interaction by means which constrain the use of our most significant and stimulating junction, we facilitate focus on increasingly detache and arbitrary endpoints. This means a reality where humans are less able to recognize one another's unique form, state of being, and viability in this world, and one where we are more readily invited to indulge in directing our minds to matters of import.
Oh, the irony of bringing about an industrial revolution, in the name of altruism and humanity, whose effect is to isolate us in chambers of vanity so easily believed to be virtue.
Issues
One of the primary issues concerning the issue of blood clots is borne of the disconnect of dialogue championing widespread use of the vaccine vs that of reluctance to assume safety on the basis of the studies conducted thus far. Though there are various reasons for this, there are a few key areas of contention and disagreement with are worth understanding.
Circulation
Reports on the pharmacokinetics of the mRNA vaccines suggest that the lipid nanoparticles remain primarily at the injection site, that their payloads are delivered to muscle tissue and that spike protein is expressed in that tissue. It is furthermore thought that the spike is presented and consumed by leukocytes at the site tissue where it's presented.
Optimal State
The most optimal state of a system is with the most minimal biasing factors possible. This holds true for harmony and cohesion between two systems.
As humans, we know this intuitively because:
- The description of the human experience that we can agree on is that of the perceptual frame as perceived by the human body.
- As we embody different states of being and involve interact with the states of being of another, we find that the greatest expression of justice occurs through such a transaction wherein we have faith in the perceptual frame of the other.
Public Schooling
Must public schooling be completely done away with so how should it be replaced completely by private education I think that something has to be clarified first Berkeley possible that there could be a successful public education system but I think it's doomed to forever utilize the same base structure and progression which 2 sufficient resolution in specific important in the development of individuals I believe that even in its successes it is Laden with inauthenticity which does more to seed artifacts that inhibits human expression then it does of achieving it then it does in approaching the mean means of achievement achieving hit sonofabitch I would say that it's Target is moving increasingly off course perhaps edit increasing rate appropriate solutions to rectify it or not to be discovered on the basis of rectifying a corrupted process but
I'm learning from it end something new go back to the original question of public versus private the question in my opinion is moot matter of identifying some pre-existing means and then throwing our resources towards it you have a system for educating then please begin if you're having taken the initiative to do so might be viewed as private it's not so remarkable to me as the notion that one could believe that such a thing is possible without also taking in a tent taking an attempt to specify it otherwise it is of little importance to the one who needs to do it in the moment now and becomes more conducive to other motivations
Serum ACE-2
What is Serum ACE-2 (plasma soluble)
In most people, it is attached to endothelial completely
For an unknown reason, it is cut from the cell and this causes levels of serum ACE-2 to rise
Elevated levels occur in a number of health conditions: hypertension, heart disease, obesity, kidney disease, diabetes. it is a significant marker of mortality
Why relevant to covid-19
The virus uses the cellular ACE-2 as entry receptor
The virus has strong binding to ACE-2
What happens if there is high serum ACE-2
Serum ACe-2 also binds to the virus it is so tightly bound that the immune system treats the combined entity as foreign
Clumps of igM and igG antibodies block lung blood vessels - microthrombi
Blood cannot be oxygenated adwequately, resulting in shortness of breath
There is an even mroe serious autoimmmune response Lung endothelial cells have both ACE and ACE-2 enzymes There is 42% homology between ACE and ACE-2 -> some of the antibodies formed against ACE-2 will target ACe enzymes This will lead to severe inflammation in lung tissue and a cytokine storm -> antibodies targeting ACE and ACE-2 in lung endothelial cells Eventually leading to ventilatory failure and death
If we prove autoimmunity in COVID-19, we can treat it with existing medication.
Public or Private
Must public schooling be replaced by private? I think something must be clarified first.
It's theoretically possible that there could be a successful public education system, but if reform is sought, it's forever doomed as we attempt to rectify an apparatus whose base structure and mode of achieving progression fundamentally lack the acuity necessary to resolve the most critical challenges encountered in the development of individuals.
Whether approaching it successfully as a student, or in the celebration of the successes of the academies, the process does more to seed artifacts that inhibit optimal human expression than it does in revealing the means by which to correct the course to achieving it. In spite of improvements in technology, increases in expenditure, and an ever-growing knowledge base to draw from, the target is moving increasingly away from a line of sight with authentic human expression that has the power to heal children and, thus, communities. Some would say that the rate at which the course moves away from the target is increasing.
So, to address the question of public vs private: The question is moot and assumes the approach of identifying some pre-existing means and throwing resources towards it in an effort to discover or apply the appropriate remedies.
That is to say, if you have a system for educating, then please begin!
That your taking such an initiative to specify, formulate and bring into action a system is such that the observer refers to it as a private enterprise is not so remarkable as is the notion that one could believe that the superior, or even ideal, means of educating is to be discovered through hope and support. Focusing on that distinction of public vs private is of little use to the one who needs to make use of a better system in this moment, today and now.
The discourse which quantifies and contrasts the public vs private is itself more conducive to motivations other than educating.
Must public schooling be completely replaced with private education?
I think something must be clarified first.
First, I believe it's theoretically possible that there could be a successful public education system, but I think that if reform is sought, it's forever doomed as we are attempting to rectify an apparatus whose base structure and mode of achieving progression fundamentally lack the acuity necessary to resolve the most critical challenges encountered in the development of individuals.
Whether in approaching it successfully as a student, or in the celebration of the successes of the academies, the process does more to seed artifacts that inhibit optimal human expression than it does in revealing the means by which to correct the course to achieving it. In spite of improvements in technology, increases in expenditure, and an ever-growing knowledge base to draw from, the target is moving increasingly away from a line of sight with authentic human expression that has the power to heal children and, thus, communities. Some would say that the rate at which the course moves away from the target is itself increasing.
So, to address the question of public vs private: In my opinion, the question is moot. The question assumes the approach of identifying some pre-existing means and then throwing our resources towards it in an effort to discover or apply the appropriate remedies.
That is to say, if you have a system for educating, then please begin!
If you do, and your having taken such an initiative to specify, formulate and bring into action a system is such that the observer refers to it as a "private enterprise" is not so remarkable as is the notion that one could believe that the superior, or even ideal, means of educating is to be discovered through hope and support. Focusing on that distinction of public vs private is of little use to the one who needs to make use of a better system in this moment, today and now.
The discourse which quantifies and contrasts the public vs private means available to educate is itself more conducive to motivations other than educating.
Mother's day
Mother's Day
Mother, the feminine, the creator, that which bears the potential for experience and ignites the necessity for change.
It's through mother that we accept reality.
It's through mother that we acknowledge the simple truth of nature and the richness of all that it entails.
Thank you for being the nature of reality which expresses truth as life.
Conspiracy
Spira C it's a conspiracy is always said or so it is always said it is always suggested that if you question any aspect any details of what you're being told then it follows that you are alleging a conspiracy and it to have even gone down this road which before being elucidated is now already Being Framed by your critic is sufficient evidence that you are a crazy person and no one should listen to you but who is the crazy one he whom is willing to organize and analyze piecemeal bit by bit revealing the manner of their sauce thought and the findings of their research for he who has such an aversion to the idea of any new knowledge Atlee repelled and unable to even entertain and indulge the thoughts and ideas of their brethren they who are unable to conceive then if someone were to be busy themselves with such concerns
that they have thoughts and beliefs that would compel them to expend their resources but that in spite of this there is no willingness for them to be heard endless time he who holds this position of intolerance to speak and share all of their thoughts and feelings and experiences as though there are a whole and complete Bonafide human being I'm like their Brethren who is perhaps nothing more than an illusion or at least a caricature a broken mechanism Waters and sputters without admitting any intelligent pattern they could ever be worthy of time in detention attention the truth is that there needn't be any conspiracy tons it is suggested there's no conspiracy has to be rich death of expressions that can be embodied by men there's no conspiracy as to the mechanism of incumbency which should logical which should logically attempts to protect its position no conspiracy as to the process of transactions by virtue of president has always set a standard that it needs to continue to match or exceed P2 the ego who's corresponding conception of identity risks incurring infinite despair if it feels to be propagated no conspiracy as to the utility Gordy's and nomenclature in mustering and directing political power no conspiracy for accepting the short-term benefit of complacency in place of facing the Wrath calling everyone to Words. Which lies beyond their eyes
Treatment
Treatment
Somehow, it is assumed that those in roles which provide treatment only perform good deeds, and that the benefit of one's treatment is based on its category, and not the nuance of how it is performed and by whom. That a standard of care is not traumatic and is not, as such, demanding a balancing of one form of trauma vs another.
A treatment brings about stress, entropy and a demand for compensatory processes which produce their own sets of resource requirements. Life does this as well, thus one must be cognizant of the transaction being produced, as the focus as to what aspect of the transaction is critical might be easily misallocated when the state of affairs are such that acuity is discouraged in favour of clean categorization.
There are no magic potions or lottery jackpots for the transformation of one's body, of one's being. The path to health and resilience is an ongoing pursuit, and one wherein the acuity is paramount to ensuring that the steps being taken are, indeed, advancing oneself towards goals apropos to one's ultimate concept of a life well-lived.
Understand yourself so that you might understand your treatment.
Russel Conjugation
Russell Conjugation
The war for our minds is waged using feelings. Emotive conjugation. Facts play limited role in informing empathy.
- Too many publishers, no control of information
- Weaponization of empathy to make up for this
- We hold many conflicting opinions, thus we act on them through emotional state
Our opinions can be manipulated without having to falsify facts. Most words and phrases not defined by single dictionary description, but:
- Factual content of word
- Emotional content of construction
Word synonyms carrying same factual content, regardless of emotional content. Leads to peculiar effect where a positive word can bear negative emotion.
Human mind looks ahead to determine social consequence of accepting facts. Evolved trait to safely form opinions which respect the manner in which facts are presented in social environment.
Minds mirror emotional state of the source of information. When narrating, we subliminally instruct listeners on how to colour perception.
Russell demonstrates: "Those who do not change their minds"
- I am firm [Positive]
- You are obstinate [Neutral]
- They are pigheaded [Negative]
Without factual information, we consider circumstances under which a narrator uses one over vs other.
Other example: Death tax vs estate tax
Power of emotive conjugation shows how we hold contradictory opinions. "Illegal aliens" -> deportation "undocumented immigrants" -> amnesty and citizenship
Media doesn't control what information we can access, but how information is emotionally shaded.
Information comes from more sources than before, but empathy guided by fewer sources.
We fear authentic emotions disrupt our acceptance by a social groups, so we look to others to see what we should feel.
Professional Errors
Increasingly, we more and more professionals from the most formally relevant fields are making publicly visible statements describing their realization of what they believe to have been a gross error.
Though some might be doing the bare minimum in order to preserve salience for whatever condition their professional atmosphere might require of them, it is clear that an inflection point is approaching, and many will need to start conceptualizing what the shift of narrative ought to bring about.
Unfortunately, it's not just a matter of preserving public trust. The transformation of public policy, whether due to malice or merely limitations whose implications become more pronounced as scope and intensity of governance expand, has become increasingly harmful. It is hoped that it is simply an ugly coincidence that this is due to efforts made in the name of public health, but there is good reason to speculate as to why the semantics of these transformations have been so universally similar across the globe.
The new standard of coercion is less respectful of human life, and to our children - placing demands on them if not for any better reason than normalize demands that are broad, invasive and without exception.
If, truly, we are to make progress from any sort of realization, it will need to be along dimensions more substantial than your country's health department. The battle will need to be held over our very ability to transact with one another, its terms, its implements and the extent to which it can be buffered and expanded to artificially support greater economic activity.
All of this will need to be defined and debated: we need to understand what is good monetary policy, and fight to have our laws express it.
Obviously False
no action that's obviously false for we all know of malicious If it has to play out as if it has to play out as a battle of semantics in order to inform a decision that in order to inform the decision that must be made an action that must be performed then all efforts to limit that process For though it may for though it may contend that it is negating other forms of suppression is negating other forms of suppression are a stated suppression of human perception it cannot do so without also suppressing human perception in the dog is human perception in the dialog which evaluates the legitimate it's the legitimacy of the claim that those surprised if suppressed processes are themselves suppressive
InYoung Video
Hey guys,
I'm a bit scared to make this video but wanted to be honest and real about it.
Today I will share my thoughts on how I started this YouTube journey from the beginning and what I am going to do with this channel for the future. If you are new here, My name is InYoung. This channel is all about learning Korean language and culture. Even if you are not interested in those topics, this video may still relate to you if you are a YouTube or an immigrant to a new county like me. If you like this video, please like. If not, dislike and leave a comment with why.
First of all, I sincerely thank you if you have been following this channel for a while. I don't think I have ever made an explicit video about why I started teaching Korean and started this channel.
Here we go!
I was born and raised in South Korea and I met my boyfriend who is now my husband online. I came to Canada in 2007 (I was 22) for a short period to see the different cultures and improve my English. Our relationship became serious quickly despite some challenges of a long distance relationship and being apart when I went back home.
2 years later in 2009, I moved to Canada on my own while my family stayed in Korea. As my husband was Canadian and didn't know the Korean language that well, my natural thing to do was to teach my language so he could understand where I was coming from, and communicate with my family.
That's how I started to teach Korean. My goal was just that, "help his Korean". As I was "fresh off the boat(plane)" to Canada, I didn't know how to make a living (I was too young to have any career at that point) nor did I have friends or any connections, so I found local Canadians to teach Korean. I did that mainly for a year or so and that became my side job while pursuing a hairstyling career in this new country.
After being a Korean teacher for many years, I really saw my students who had zero knowledge in Korean improve their level to be at a speaking level.
and I think about how all the different people that she has taught, and how they've had different interests which lead them to wanting to learn korean
and how it was a great opportunity to meet the sorts of people who continuously go out and find new things to discover and learn, ways to enrich themselves and their lives
and how there seemed to be a high incidence of such people among those who had been attracted to her service and maintained a discipline
So I thought it would be cool if people on the internet could also benefit from my teaching style. So I started my YouTube channel in summer of 2015. I made my first videos during the summer school break as I went back to school in 2015 to pursue a new career “computer programming”. But it didn’t work well as I went back to school from the summer break, I really couldn't keep up with my school work and YouTube at the same time. I took a long break from making videos.
After finishing my school, I resumed making content on YouTube 3 years later in 2018. I was very dedicated to growing my channel while having my full time job as a computer programmer. When the covid hit in early 2020, I was not working for a month or so as we were advised to not work. I did live streams every day as well. That’s the time I got to know a lot of you. If you have been following this channel, you also know that I just had my first baby this year in 2021. Now she is almost 7 months old. I have reduced the frequency of putting content to 1 video a week.
I haven’t missed a single week not uploading a video even after having a baby but I had many times I felt like I wanted to give up. I felt frustrated that I didn’t have enough time to create and edit videos while learning the whole side of me as a mom.
As you may have noticed, I made a shift recently. Instead of focusing on creating content only around education, my videos were more on the entertainment side. Thank you if you watched and enjoyed them.
Let me explain why I did that as some of you seemed to be wondering about it. As editing is the work that takes the most amount of hours every week, I hired an editor for the recent videos. If I create more entertainment videos, I don’t need to worry about giving him all kinds of instructions on Korean scripts.. Another reason I put out content like that was to just try something new/ have fun and hopefully attract new subscribers as well. I am not sure what I am doing makes any sense and I may regret it later but if I put out a content every week as promised without losing momentum, that’s my success for this time.
I will do more Q & A videos going forward and we may actually have it as a weekly series to answer as many questions as I could related to Korean or not.
Hope you enjoyed this video and see you guys next time. ByeBye!
Reality Coming Up Short
When Reality Comes Up Short
It's likely that almost every individual had come to a realization at some point in their life that existence had not given them the experience that they believed they deserved. This might be because of a general understanding of what experiences are available for some and not others, and perhaps not oneself either. It might be because of of an understanding of a range of physical capabilities that ar adorned to some,
Push into corner
Pushed us into a corner so that some people who stand up against the tyranny. The proportion of people who are not willing to comply is large enough such that they can replace major societal infrastructure with military.
Also power of other special military from all over the world, in the case that localized military stand up or fail to comply.
And so we are to defend ourselves from Tyranny.
All along, so many have been fulfilling the precepts of Tyranny, producing a rationale for it, apologizing for its flaws and making it known that they have no faith in the ability of humanity to conduct itself ethically and that this was itself a reason to institute Tyranny. Why would we have been demanding this? What beliefs lead us down the path towards it, and what beliefs uphold it even when it becomes so clear?
To demand for Totalitarianism, to demand that there is a totality and that it can be encompassed within one scope whose integrity in every semantic aspect can be safeguarded by a single control mechanism.
Phenomenon of Submission
It's a strange phenomenon in which case we have decided to submit ourselves to matter, and the belief in matter, under the presumption that we can transcend limitations of matter without having to understand them or the means of transcending them
How does that work exactly? Why wouldn't we simply be explicitly investing in matter, knowingly, and thus being more in line with an understanding which expects clear and absolute limitations?
It is an attack on truth, and one which is reinforced truly because of a complete disbelief in what is true.
We might sometimes like to imagine that we somehow exist in an ethereal and inabsolute form, and that this would afford us some special possibilities that would otherwise not even be possible, within the realm of our material reality. So this is a means of choosing matter in such a way where the laws of matter no longer apply as a consequence. A submission to matter.
If you have faith in matter, you empower the force which can redefine matter such as to rescue you from it. The promise is one which accounts for everyone who is willing to believe. It gives you every reason to believe except that what it proposes wouldn't have been true in the old reality. So accept it, and show your faith so we can transcend reality and save humanity. In saving humanity you save yourself, too.
But that doesn't make sense, does it? How can someone who chooses matter explicitly actually mean to transcend its limitations? Surely if they choose the matter they value the perceptual frame yet more.
They needn't be aware of the possibility of choosing something other than ... ?
It isn't necessarily the choosing of a scientifically understood solution. It's scientifically understood in the sense that they're aware of a scientific narrative, aware of the basics of what the scientific process consists of, at least in a loose sense related to their experiences in high school, and in the sense that they are aware that professionals drawn harmful attention to themselves in order to communicate something which goes against that narrative. This knowledge should bother anyone who holds science in high regard, as it's easy for them to ignore professionals who don't align with the narrative. How can that be, if they've had any understanding of science at all? Surely they understand the notion that scientists may disagree, and that there is greater improvement and understanding as continues
Graphs
Graphs:
Adjacency Matrix Adjacency List
Represent a graph on a computer -> how? The two methods above
Adjacency Matrix
m x n Rows and columns
2 3 1 4 5
n is number of vertices in the graph
n x n would be 5 x 5
| | | | |
Vertices, or nodes, have an edge if they are directly connected
graph_matrix[n][n]
where n is # of vertices graph_matrix[i][i] = 1 if i + j have edge
Adjacency List (linked list)
1| |->2->4 2| |->1->3->4 3| |->2->4->5 4| | 5| |
Acountable for Vulnerability
The means by which we are vulnerable are also the means through which we are accountable.
With respect to the body, its capacity for restoration can have its delicate process thrown into disarray through the failure of its components. Amazingly, the system of the body have redundancies, and these depend on mechanisms which can deduce the need to consolidate the shift from the more preferably-equilibrated state.
The mask brings an opportunity to hide vulnerabilities innate to our physical form. That we are accountable to the actions of the body is an intrinsic consequence of the ability for one to be identified. Repeating the ritual of suppressing that ability also ambiguates one's experience, conception of self, and conception of reality as a whole.
As the human face is an interface through which it's plausible that the densest data can be exchanged, as not only does it rapidly provide a path to large sets of metadata, but it also provides a dynamic and continuous stream of output containing potent indicators of emotive and physiological state heavily impacting the context of environment and probabilities of an ever-changing set of outcomes.
As we alter the standard of social interaction by means which constrain the use of our most significant and stimulating junction, we facilitate focus on increasingly detached and arbitrary endpoints. This means a reality where humans are less able to recognize one another's unique form, state of being, and viability in this world, and one where we are more readily invited to indulge in directing our minds to matters of import to one's ego.
Oh, the irony of bringing about an industrial revolution, in the name of altruism and humanity, whose effect is to isolate us in chambers of vanity so easily believed to be virtue.