logicp_writings/new/child.log

Who would willingly sacrifice their child
who would pretend to be ignorant, to not have been able to predict or theorize as to the harms that might come to their own child
where they would be willing to pretend to not be aware that the assumptions about a particular risk might not be 100% accurate
that they might even be complacent about the accuracy of safety being asserted for their own child
because even a slight change in the accuracy can mean a different level of risk for your child
so why would you be complacent about such a thing?
why would you allow others to fib with the numbers and make proclamations and make political declarations and make promises and progress their own political career using numbers which indicate the safety of your child
that you might be complacent about the accuracy of your child's safety, as it is used as a tool for someone's political gain
to turn away and expect that surely it must be accurate enough
it must be safe enough
such that you don't have to scrutinize and challenge it
that you don't need to fight tooth and nail to ensure that each and every single time another person makes a declaration as to your child's safety, that it's accurate a and that there's no other way to think about the issue which might increase the safety of your child
the safety as a starting point, of course, because we can surely keep going and talk about their expression, their biological potential, and so forth
One would have to be afraid of the consequences of challenging that number
Or they would have to be self absorbed with other matters and have developed a habit of ignoring the aspects of the environment which can harm their child
or that might have found some way wherein the lie is benefitting them too
and they've becoming willing to put their child at a little bit of risk, because it's not likely to be pronounced enough such that a problem arising from it would be obvious and unmistakable
you cna always hide behind mediocrity and ignorance if you need to
exit