Is there really a big difference? Religious Fanatics R Woke W Covidists C
R1. All must subscribe and pray, or they are unholy and inviting evil into our shared environment W1. All must join in our anti-racist plight, or they are contributing to racism C1. All must participate in our proactive efforts to stop the spread of COVID, or they are actively potentiating and even directly involved in its propagating its trans mission.
R2. All are cursed and contaminated by the devil and must denounce him. W2. All are infected with racism and must denounce their racism as a step towards becoming less racist C2. All are vectors for viral load and must take the vaccine to reduce the amount of virus they spread. Even the vaccinated are spreaders of the virus. All are to be re garded as contaminated with coronavirus and must take the first step towards reducing their viral load by taking the injection.
R3. All must use the Holy Language, but make its associated declarations, lest they glorify devilry. W3. Don't microaggress, bigot. C3. Language must not give rise to vaccine hesitancy, must not vilify those who promote vaccination.
of course, if you realy want to mitigate the tendency of religious fanaticism to become murderous and intolerant, you need open dialogue between persons of different be lief systems who cooperate in a society for the greater good of all
of course, if you really want the most robust protection against racism, you need to have persons who freely use their minds to understand the futility of racism and pr omote universal truths which benefit everyone
of course, if you want the most robust protection against pathogens, you need a population with comprehensive physiological expression, physiological overhead and compr ehensively adapted immune systems
Take steps to be comprehensive
! °°° #covidism #religiousExtremism #religiousFanaticism #wokeism #criticalTheory #resistTyranny #totalitarianism #authoritarianism #freedom #believeInYourself #potentialForG enius #masterYourBody #masterYourMind
It would be impossible for them to prove to themselves that they are an exception to the descriptions which apply to their age group. The description would have to be embodied and applied to their perception of the world in order for them to perform the act of evaluating and confirming their accuracy.
For them to do this without being made to understand its inapplicability is, more directly, a confirmation that they, while believing themselves to be part of a group, agree that they think and feel as the CRT explicated illustration of presents them to think and feel. It is an expression of them embodying those thoughts, at the very least for the duration of that embodied assessment, and subsequent reflective confirmations, so long as those subsequent confirmations entail the requisite effort of producing a conception to make reference to, as opposed to a completely thoughtless and a track record of lazy confirmation.