|
|
@@ -382,4 +382,420 @@ There might be many moments, but not the least of which being:
|
|
|
- environment
|
|
|
- health care
|
|
|
- When we extrapolate wisdom across humans, assume a model of linear trajectory, aim to understsand a perspective by placing ourselves in the relevant situation, and so forth
|
|
|
-- As our abstract, do we come to also see ourselves as negative?
|
|
|
+- As our abstract, do we come to also see ourselves as negative?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Dialectical Inversion
|
|
|
+February 18, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The dialectical inversions never quite complete, but they are best described as gaining power by criticizing and also proposing an alternative which solves the specific problem to which you had drawn attention
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+So, on the topic of weaving syntheses in order to supplant ideas and understandings through the technique of dialectical inversion, we come upon a technical discussion about work targets and work task viability. That is, we find ourselves looking to find the utility of normies (perhaps not fully-fledged NPCs) and it is contentious.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+We see a balancing act taking place on the pivot of opinion surrounding an issue, but is that so much the aggregate of genuinely-formed opinion, or an expression of human mind and experience given a set of conditions? We might say that education makes some more courageous, but we can't be sure that everyone who comes to accept a better idea, or form a critique of a bad idea (or vice versa!), is doing so at the behest of courage or bravery.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Perhaps the better "go-to" perspective on this has to do with having a bare minimum of mage-level warriors wh can disarm the threat and flip the tables without completely selling out on one's principles. That is, people need a demonstration of what' spossibly when someone pushes to reveal more substance of the issue being deliberated. This, at a fundamental level, need be demonstrated to simply have it become enumerated. Things which are not enumerated can't be expected to be observed or discovered (though that isn't to say that they won't be).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Then, it alos has a time component to be considered. The effectiveness of the interaction considers a range of what outcomes might be achieved not just in the sense of success, but whether the transformed recipient might become semantically astute to a degree sufficient to provide significant assistance towards the disarmament and elimination of woke gnosticism.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+And so they ask: "Why would you wish to eliminate something from the marketplace of ideas?" to which I first respond with "no one has said it must be eliminated as an idea". Literally, what they are doing, is invoking your principle or value of having the ability to have ideas juxtaposed and set into competition and proposing to transform its meaning to saying that an idea should be left uncriticized and unchallenged as proof that you are willing to be open to ideas, and new ideas in particular, as a whole. It's utter nonsense and it has nothing to do with proving that one acknowledges the value fo a marketplace of ideas. A market place of ideas is precisely why you aren't demanding that someone be silenced on the basis of them having described an idea to you. That you are willing to refute the idea specifically shows that you value the marketplace of ideas as you have upheld the standard which makes a marketplace of ideas possible. That is, discussion and debate rather than censorship.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+*But it is not enough for it simply to be enumerated and known of. You haven't actually given it a fair try because you speak ill of it without having attempted to practice it yourself - without having adopted it into your life and world in order to fully see how the particulars function against the whole.*
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+So, there are a few issues here. The first of which being that, fundamentally, they are usurping and manipulating the means by which you sufficiently attempt/experiment with an idea. That is, there is no formal understanding of both what constitutes an idea being adequately explored, nor the degree to which one must have attempted to adopt it in experiment or how to understand whether one has formed a legitimate opinion. It is not even the case taht a formality can be compared for this, especially not without a breach of ethics and the potentiation of tyranny and domination.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The next issue is that there are, indeed, means of denying or rejecting an idea out of hand based simply on its proposed logical structure and, given that these ideas in contention are derived and continued from the domain of Critical Theory, we know already that the proposition itself is to supplant critical thinking with a process of dialectical inversion/inversion of praxis - to do so is an **Act of Faith** and, in this case, the Faith is presented as a rationale for undermining and eroding human freedom and liberty.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Freedom is an Ideology
|
|
|
+February 20, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Freedom is just an ideology which results in humanity having no freedom.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+How do we quantify this assertion?
|
|
|
+- We don't need to, at least not along an agreed-upon dimension or level of observation
|
|
|
+- We, in fact, do quantify on the basis of whether we, ourselves, are satisfied with the environment and social structure, in real terms, phenomenologically, or theoretically - a theory of which only some are experts
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Becoming an Expert in Theory
|
|
|
+How do you become an expert in The Theory?
|
|
|
+1. You must hold the opinion as the consensus of its experts
|
|
|
+2. You must declare that the theory holds precedence over its alternatives
|
|
|
+3. You must do the work!
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+And, so, here is the implicit Dialectic of Freedom. A synthesis presupposing that there is no principle of freedom. There is something much more complex and sophisticated in the sense that we can establish freedom through the following:
|
|
|
+- Enumerate actions, characterizations, attributes and so on with which to evaluate one's freedom (score or index)
|
|
|
+ - Assumes that quality and compisition of freedom are indeed universal, but only behind an opaque function which, yet again, can only be interpreted or defined by experts of The Theory
|
|
|
+ - Assess populations, chosen by experts, to draw up this data as necessary and transform/modify/evolve the social structure as is appropriate
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+What of the default circumstance of Freedom as an Ideology, which assumes universality and which is used to prevent the creation and enforcement of laws which actually grant and enable freedom? Let us declare, define and critique.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Freedom, Definition and Critique
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### System
|
|
|
+Temporality. Object localization. Movement potential. Dimensions of movement. Object creation/destruction. Object modification/transformation
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Freedom is characterized, observed and expressed through:
|
|
|
+- movement, constraint, access to resources, ability to think ,the proportion of unwasted time, connection to genuine, ability to avoid fallacy, life expectancy, personal ability
|
|
|
+- We could come up with an infinite set of expressions and activities for which a case could be made that they constitute freedom itself, or can function as a legitimate proxy, and you can evaluate a freedom index or score to establish whether the state / apparatus - that is, they score your freedom according to their own conception of freedom or the proxies by which it is to be evaluated
|
|
|
+- They enumerate a set of actions, expressions and circumstances which they represent as affecting a freedom score and then not only determine your freedom score through it, but measure their own progress insofar that they promote or create the freedom of others/the world (they also, consequently, completely monopolize not just the means of evaluating freedom, but even imposing an implied philosophical argument or concept as to what freedom is)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Who gets to decide what constitutes freedom?
|
|
|
+Those with freedom or those without?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Freedom is one's own free movement along any conceivable dimension. One might say that freedom is also, then, the freedom to harm and oppress, but that is not so perfectly apparent. Causing harm to other humans in some ways constrains even the person causing that harm. Emotional disturbance and conditioning to no longer be made content through other actions and circumstances. Now, through habituation, they fall into a destructive pit.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Infringing on Freedoms
|
|
|
+And even if one's own freedom is somehow maintained, the fact that it has potential to infringe on the freedom of others in any capacity means it's not only a freedom but also a constraint.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+That's right! Any and all actions with a body in space time will certainly infringe on others, if even by occupying space that could otherwise be occupied by another (or be made a part of one's prospective pathway which is now made difficult to conceive of due to your having infringed on the possibilities of space and movement of others), thus there can always be a rationale that your actions - your every action - incurs cost and burden to all others and that your very existence means that you must pay for the cost you placed on the world. In a world of data, this must be recorded and tracked - if we are to have an equitable and inclusive society.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+So, you see, your very existence is, in a sense, unreasonable. It does not make sense that a being, such as yourself, should have come to be only as a net cost to the world. This is a form of original sin and though one might point to primitive peoples of primitive times, such peoples were actually sophisticated to maintain their process of survival with fewer tools and less knowledge.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### The Body that Infringes
|
|
|
+How can you repent for having a body? Repent for not being immortal. Repent for the density of your existence; you should be no more dense and sluggish than light, which should be the case if you are pious and pure; if you contribute revolutionary energy; if you bring about Critical Consciousness.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The sin of the body is eternal, with prehistoric theological thinking having first realized the potential for sex-related depravity. You cannot fool everyone, but when I am serious about discovering options, use both sides and reap rewards.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+How would we have first discovered shame through the body? Being simply less capable in any regard? For at least hundreds of thousands of years, but perhaps millions, human-like beings have been sufficiently intelligent to reflect on their environment, actions, cause+effect, survival potential and their sensations and emotions.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Comparisons
|
|
|
+The comparison that a being may have placed itself in may have been against other peers of differing stature and abilities and age, or even against one's conception of how they would feel if successful (more). It does not really require more than that in order to feel negative emotion with respect to limitations and circumstances surrounding one's existence through the perception afforded by having the body.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For all of these thousands to millions of years, that body could not change. There were no sophisticated and lasting mechanisms by which one could adopt the means of enhancing or presenting as enhanced their body / physical form.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+One wonders whether the earliest experiences of shame caused the beings in question to lie. Because we now lie even without feeling the shame, but to keep ourselves from feeling it (if even several levels of abstraction removed from the context of that shameful scenario
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Valuing Critical
|
|
|
+March, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Faux Stance
|
|
|
+What is the goal with critical thinking but to challenge existing limits on what is known in order to bring about enlightenment and development?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+*Of course, that's absurd, as one is critical to critique the existing society which they feel cannot serve. It's the ruthless criticism of all that exists (the existing order), not to means of putting forward the society which does serve. The terms of the truly harmonious society are not comprehensible within the current existing order, thus it must be torn down - it must be taken down and dismantled to alleviate the limits of subjectivity. That is to say, a creative and productive approach would posit the replacement for the society, but the assumption is that the path to a new society - to a good society - would be found be critiquing exising aspects of the current society out of existence. Identify and target the aspects which should be destroyed so that the ideal society can be conceived of*
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+What could possibly be holding humanity's development and enlightenment than subjugation, indoctrination, wastefulness and malicious excesses? Surely we can see that in the periods that we suddenly have growth, or make progress, that things can rapidly improve -> from temperment to the quality of life, to the degree that someone can become serious in their operational capacity.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+__So, it is actually you who has failed to be critical. You circumvent the opportunity to present the widest variety of perspectives on the matter, preventing yourself from thinking critically.__
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+What is happening, here? Incessant and ambiguous demands that you aren't valuing particular evidence or ideas based on the presumption that those forms of argument present an approach that is referred to as "critical". Critical thinking is being supposed, but then being represented as anything which "challenges existing limits on what is known" or anything that leads to "enlightenment" and "development").
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Any demand for political power and resource distribution, so it is obviously something which potentiates development. Resources lead to education and, thus, to enlighten those who most need it.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The play on all the terms that people trust and assume they can rely on is exhausting, and also the deliberate target of those who seek maximum utilitarianism. For them, the utility proves that it is true and that it should be no surprise for anyone who has attended school.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Teachers are one reason for this, but we should always remember that the soruce/initiating factor for the socially utilitarian truth is the children; that is to say, it is ourselves - as this is a natural, evolutionarily supportable, self-preserving approach to understanding and communicating about truth. In a sense, th pragmatists' truth ends up being the only one which can be analyzed and validated. It's the only thing that you've seen for sure whether it has power-power to evoke change, power to be believed, and the power to be so evidently the description of how things should be.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Pejorative Directions
|
|
|
+Again, it is a shame to see so much concern about one's declared political disposition as well as one's political associations. Even more profound, however, is one's concern as to whether their choice is recognized as being of the colour and association that they prefer. But why is it a preference? Why not simply have a behaviour and disposition of one's own that no political cookie cutter can accuratel describe? Why not put all the effort into determining what you think and why, rather than what framing of your thoughts is likely to cause onlookers or interlocutors to perceive you some particular way? If you are operating in this way, you have misrepresented yourself and you likely don't have developed thoughts on the matter in question. You ar e aslave to your desire for social benefit and you choose your position in the social hierarchy as having greater iportance than your thoughts, or even having thoughts. You are a slave to sensations and you are foregoing the opportunity to bring something unique into being.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Back to Chaos
|
|
|
+March 10, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+We must melt off the murky cultural confusion and direct group associations which feed pride and ego, and just generally impede progress and understanding. Ultimtaely, we need to see each participant's behaviour at the level of analysis where they are most alike and then traverse to higher levels of abstraction and use the previous understanding to make more insightful predictions and descriptions.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+We are complex beings because there are many facets of our being that can be examined and used to make more robust a proposed understanding or theory of our behaviour.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+We have sensations - a continuous set of cascading seas interwoven intuitively and calibrated in effect, defining our experiences, adjusted such as to incorporate those sensations in perceptive frame and memory formation, be it through a sensation being made more apparent and influential, all the way to the opposite be it by valence or type of parameter.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Together, as a matrix of properties and processes, it forms an expression of being which itself is not limited to within, or amongst the self.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+But what too we have is fierce and rabid desire to help us insist on the voice of logos echoing through the field of reality. The unrelenting, stubborn drive to charge forward with the entirety of whatever capactities can be afforded as an unwavering assault through the contour of a perceived environment. Taking its shape and pattern as it appears and following through with an expressive interplay with it. A complete and continuous flow where the intiation and reaction are indiscernible - collapsing into one another so perfectly as to be expressing total stability.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Is that what is being harnessed, here? To reduce everyone to a complete loss of cotrol and intolerant mode so that they clamour and whimper for the only matter that they believe will satiate their emotive needs while also completely starving them of other nourishment? The real satiating parts of life have nothing to do with access to material sensation. The fulfilling of emotional or carnal desires can never articulate the omega part of the journey. In fact, such a thing could only serve to cloud the path and process. (makes no sense - was falling asleep)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Manipulative Money
|
|
|
+March 2023
|
|
|
+- Insisting that a position taken is predicated on one contentious memory
|
|
|
+- Complete intolerance of perspectives you disagree with
|
|
|
+- Attitude of entitlement to your company
|
|
|
+- Ignorance that your mood affects others
|
|
|
+- Passive aggression through referring to you and your life as depraved
|
|
|
+- Expressions of disgust
|
|
|
+- Endless self-indulgeance
|
|
|
+- Bringing up issues you disagree on and then circumventing your perspective through playing the subject off of others
|
|
|
+- Pretending to be ignorant as to your position on a matter
|
|
|
+- Bringing the state's authority and ideals into domestic environments
|
|
|
+- Pretending to care for hearing one's perspective while never listening
|
|
|
+- Failure to demonstrate family loyalty and cohesion vs ideals of the state
|
|
|
+- Demonstrating that you are willing to keep company with those whose values you don't care to hear
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Health Crisis
|
|
|
+March, 2023
|
|
|
+The path to transform reality interfaces through the issue of health.
|
|
|
+Public Health Gnosis
|
|
|
+- What it means to be healthy
|
|
|
+- The carceral aspects of reality making health unfeasible
|
|
|
+- Health cannot be achieved without changing reality
|
|
|
+- The human body is not naturally healthy
|
|
|
+- We must come close to death in order to have a healthy life
|
|
|
+- The only path to any individual health is through collective commitment
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Covid State of Working People can impose restrictions:
|
|
|
+- because they are the humans that work to create Communism
|
|
|
+- other humans aren't trying to stop dominating through capitalism
|
|
|
+- everything they hope for is predicated on a belief of forcing their constraints on others -> dictatorship
|
|
|
+- the helpless, individually unhappy, non-working workers
|
|
|
+- no hope to create their own health -> must define what health will be and then force everyone to agree and express that manner of health
|
|
|
+ - making it the idea and understanding of health which exists in our reality
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Tribal
|
|
|
+We can be swayed to a tribal position on any issue.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Not a matter of logic, but an enforcing of a change in lexicographical ordering whether by competing factors or choice of level of abstraction.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+With race, for example, they have completely rejected the concept of colourblindedness and have come to represent it and refer to it as an aspect of White Supremacy, the ideology of Whiteness, and even the ideologies of Capitalism and Colonialism.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This isn't exactly to say that they don't think there are people who genuinely believe they are treating everyone equal, or not applying judgement by race, or even that it isn't possible that someone might be or could become capable of doing just that (though most would reject the latter as impossible), but that to do so would itself be an act of racism, and that it perpetuates racism by not taking the opportunity to enact or compel antiracism.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# The Pronoun Trigger
|
|
|
+March 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+They claim your failure to use the language demanded of you si evidence of you being triggered, but wait until they find out that you don't actually speak in reference to them except as a fascinating study of human behaviour, social conditioning, psychology and cultural revolution.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+It's a shame that their school environment has declared that a modified handle and process of speech is necessary for them to be respected, reassued, and made more stable, because it posits that the manner in which they lived their life was not sufficient and that this was due to their mind or soul being incongruent with the social constructions made around and about their body.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+But this presumes that the distinctions which exist between humans, as expressed in terms of the structure fo the human body which have allowed for humans to have existed as long as they have, are also complete fabrications, and that one's choice with respect to one's perception of one's own body is just as arbitrary.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The fact is that there are always complications which come with having a body, and any path which increases those complications cannot be presented as being an approach more conducive to health of being.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# The Freedom Loving Socialist
|
|
|
+Interesting to see self-proclaimed socialists who advocate Freedom of Speech. It seems to me that the vast majority of these are slightly older to senior aged and that their position and opinion thereof is the product of assuming the plentiful runoff more than suffices to provide living and thriving resources for the entirety of the populace.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+So much effort is spent to convert people to one's view rather than feeling that we are so privileged to have access to a variety of views and perspectives. This is partly because of the socially-mediated, and even professionally and survival-related consequences that exist today, but it is also, in a more direct sense, the consequence that much of the framing and dialogue comes in a form which accuses the other of wrongdoing.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+So, why do I see a distinction? What is my excuse?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. The framing is done to fabricate a model/stereotype and then hold it over you as a constant threat while forcing you to always hear their recitation of reality which they recruited you for as a witness to confirm it is true through your absence of protest, knowing full-well that they are being manipulative, threatening and abusive by doing so (but excusing it under the belief or stated belief that it is measured and serving a great purpose).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+2. The simple fact that absence of action is not action, or especially not the action you portray it as
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Proxy Debunking
|
|
|
+No one really cares to debunk the debunk when it's not something which represents the issue in the first place, much less the take on the matter that someone particularly had composed out of their concern.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+What are people concerned about, with this transformation of law, standards, wealth, public health apparatus and culture?
|
|
|
+*Quite simply, they are concerned that their value, and the value in pursuing existence through the human experience, are being suppressed and made into unnecessary suffering*
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Duality
|
|
|
+There are those who already believe the human experience itself is acceptable and improving, and others who claim they cannot accept this / cannot tolerate it.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# On Freedom
|
|
|
+If freedom is defined as a being's ability to undertake, affect and transform as per dimensionally discernible movement, then the crucial apparatus through which these movements can be determined to be viable/feasible and just would be that of speech, as it is through interlocutory transaction, argumentation and understanding that the consequences of these movements can be understood.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Dialectic of Life
|
|
|
+## Thesis
|
|
|
+- Living
|
|
|
+## Antithesis
|
|
|
+- Dying
|
|
|
+## Synthesis
|
|
|
+Existence having purpose through instantiation of life conflicts with antithesis
|
|
|
+- This occurs as individual life, but;
|
|
|
+- the collective, as abstract, is eternal and without limitation through determination
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Death
|
|
|
+Death is only a part of life because we must be forced to exist as individual bodies, but do we not yearn for unity and togetherness? Is not all we do because of awareness to the existence of others?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+What might we think and do if the yearning and pain were alleviated while still retaining our consciousness? Is it not already suspected by some that, upon death, through our return to the void, that our frame of perception and mode of existing becomes an expression of unity, being, all, one, awareness in the pure immediacy? That this occurs as a totality?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Covidism as Marxism
|
|
|
+Yes, "Covidism" (imo) is a subset of Marxism. Or, at least, it retains the core theological aspect of Marxist thinking and it uses the dialectic to synthesize concepts like health, consent, and so forth.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+It also uses historicism
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Covidism also always asserts that those who do not conform to the new collective totality are doing so because of ideology, which very much follows a Marxist definition for "ideology"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+There are even covidists who are explicitly Marxist in the sense that they will proclaim that capitalism resulted in the conditions for SARS-CoV2 to come about, point to disaster capitalism failing to fulfill its duty to mankind, and so forth
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Just as Marx's conception of man was as a being to be completed in order to attain its nature as a species being, the covidist conception is one where its inherent structure is incomplete and must be made whole through the new synthesis of health
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This is why desire for natural immunity is a form of blasphemy, in a sense, because it functions as a contradiction towards completing the sanitized and immunologically complete being that could only come to fruition through public health
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Belief in the validity of one's health as an individual is a form of false consciousness, much in the way that a Marxist views false consciousness as that which excuses the material conditions of bourgeois society
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+That said, I do prefer the sound of "Covidian" to "Covidist", but I believe the latter to be more correct
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Marxist Theology reca
|
|
|
+### Origin
|
|
|
+man creates himself, which is why he's separate from an animal (Marx specifically sidestepped the question of infinite regress by making fun of the questioner and saying "are you an abstraction? Man should only owe his life to himself").
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Man creates the world which not only creates man but also refining the idea of what it means to be human.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Telos:
|
|
|
+Man's purpose is to complete himself as a species being, and he does this through through praxis which advances history using dialectical materialism
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Communism is basically what begins when that process completes
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Ontology:
|
|
|
+The meaning of existence as man is a consequence of man's ability to conceive of that which changes the world, to create it, and then to be changed by it
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+If he didn't have this volitional ability, the meaning of his existence wouldn't be based on having to change anything.. he could just exist like an animal
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+but because of this ability, he's basically in a prison until he can free himself by changing the world until he can fully understand himself and spiritually nourish himself through nature as the object of his subjectivity
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Theodyssey:
|
|
|
+The tragedy of existence is the evil in the world which is a consequence of division of labour creating structural conditions with a stratified class structure of humans in conflict with one another.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The great plight is to work through the violence, pain and struggle to move history until domination ends
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Soteriology:
|
|
|
+Salvation occurs through dialectical praxis (putting theory into practice, which actualizes reality and is the only truly scientific way of thinking, since it considers the activity in the historical sense that the significance of its effect is towards the very end of history which represents the most complete context of all activity (this is why use values of goods differ from their price in a market economy)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+So, again, salvation by faith in the theory which informs your practice in a spiraling process where nothing needs to be yet understood, yet this is the most scientific way of doing things 🤡
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Axiology
|
|
|
+The true values being transacted in this existence are insofar of doing the work, the praxis - consciously advancing history. The process of history and man's inability to attain his true nature until its completion gives rise to duties of conscience.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Epistemology (Gnosiological):
|
|
|
+What is true is what is what advances theory and history. As with Hegel, subject is not separate from substance, so you have true knowledge which can't be proven or disproven in the current frame of history, since not everything can be realized until man is free to follow through with the conceptions of his mind.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The epistemology is literally that things which advance it are true and things which don't are false.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This is why, for example, in Canada, they supposedly found these underground graves of indigenous kids from 70-80 years ago and, now that it seems there's no real evidence of it, it's complete blasphemy to deny it as something confirmed true and real.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+What's real is that liberation is achieved by doing the thing which moves history towards liberation. In that case, it's the unfounded, romanticized story about dead indigenous kids. That has the REAL effect of making progress.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Saying that the evidence of it isn't so good is friction against that progress, and is therefore false. Your only motivation for doing such a thing is because of your ideologies which gave you false consciousness.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Everything is incomplete. You just have to have faith in the process because of your gnosis that you are trapped in existence and could only live your true, fully actualized life once once a totalitarian collective has all achieved the same consciousness, since the consequence of that is utopia.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# How to Create the World
|
|
|
+To create the world, you must be conscious. This means that you notice which magic spells are being cast - that is, the language being used, by who and what it serves.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+You can essentially determine how conscious other people are by seeing how much they agree with you without descending to complete naivety (either because they offer no conflict and mirror all your opinions, or because the rationale for their shared position seems something of a caricature).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+So only your tribe can be creating the world (as opposed to other tribes which are creating the anti-world or whom are poisoning, wasting and killing the world, or are creating a false world which hides the fact of there being a real world to be discovered or created), and you are constantly paranoid that your members are playing for the other team - that is, they must continuously move with you in the same direction and by the same magnitude or at the same velocity. Anything reminiscient of the past has become the other side - the reactionaries.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+But also, engaging any system or partaking in any activity needs to become another instance of being...
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# We Are All Gnostics
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+What makes us all predisposed to the manner of perceiving and engaging the world as a gnostic (from the gnostic mindset)?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Mortal Thinking
|
|
|
+Perhaps it comes from the following question: *If life is something good then why do we live to die?* Once we realize our mortality we fall into fantasy and imagine the ways in wihch our personal existence might be saved.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Gnostic Historicism
|
|
|
+Historicist thinking allows us to expect anything not yet actualized. It all occurs along one train of time, making it apparent that things which happen are part of the array of things that can happen as well as that of things that are to happen.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+We are seduced by the belief that we can change reality and, perhaps later, that we can come into a higher level understanding of reality such that the perception of it conforms to our conception through reflection of that reality by other perceptions. The confirmation of seeking and discovering evidence of other perceptions confirming particular ideas is used to cultivate that higher level representation of the phenomena we encounter.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+If we can get the state to pursue a conception that we have affinity for, we are liable to perceive it as reified and becoming actualized. In this case, reification not in the sense of that claimed of bourgeois mystification, but the reification of a conception of reality which approaches the endpoint alluded to by historicist thinking.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Built into our base cognitive architecture, we continuously seek ways to simplify the complex for otherwise we drown in such immense complexity that perception and, by extension, existence itself is revealed as grotesque and obscene. Something no to be accepted, approached, or considered palatable.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Intelligently Unique
|
|
|
+March 23, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+It's particularly pernicious to face the idea, narrative and the advertising/promotion elements of ideologies which, independently and as a whole, presents that persons of a particular way of thinking (as represented within those ideologies) are as they are because of increased intelligence and uniqueness. That they notice what others cannot notice or have difficulty in noticing.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Aspects:
|
|
|
+- unique mind
|
|
|
+- withstanding a greater burden
|
|
|
+- intelligent
|
|
|
+- new intelligence
|
|
|
+- their achievements are heightened while also being difficult to compare against
|
|
|
+- simply being is a monumental accomplishment
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Queer/Trans
|
|
|
+- place "neuroatypical" under the umbrella of Queer
|
|
|
+- statistical studies/surveys showing interesting data
|
|
|
+- reinforces one's focus on anxiety, giving one reason to engage in the activities as other to the anxiety - to the anxious nature of the supposed unique self
|
|
|
+- affirmation:
|
|
|
+ - love-bombing
|
|
|
+ - companionship
|
|
|
+ - you declare congruent/relevant identity presupposing framing of ideology
|
|
|
+ - all identities also include oppressor/sin asect
|
|
|
+ - you must do the work
|
|
|
+- those outside this way of thinking are liars/deceived/immoral and harmful to the sacred, pure, unique and truly intelligent
|
|
|
+ - this purity is not insofar as the traditional uncorrupted/sexless purity as cast by fable, but expresses purity of theory - demonstrates a construct that is pure with respect to the theory
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Unconventional Warfare
|
|
|
+March 25, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+There are tactics being used that are designed to exploit the very best characteristics of humanity. Your patience, open mindedness, willingness to give people the benefit of the doubt, etc. Anything that you might associate with the concept of liberal tolerance (not liberating tolerance, which is a very difficult and different thing, indeed, especially when sorting through the dialectical framings and attacks which attempt to blend these concepts in an ambiguous concept used to undermine psychological and intellectual stability and introduce confusion to set the conditions for a dialectical inversion).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+We see it with the Attorney General in New York, who has promoted the symbols of reading and the rainbow. How interesting that it is still the most innocuous of the flags - maybe I'm reading a bit too much into that but if drag is supposed to expose children past the limits of conventional being then it stands to reason that the most conventional flag, now associated by queer activists as being monopolized by the most privileged among them - in fact by those who effectively use the moment to focus themselves, while extinguishing the authentic, passionate drive of the liberation-seeking collective.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+But they call it "don't say gay". Get over it. Gay is so far accepted that you can't find any example of those words being suppressed or forbidden except by the progressive sauce who subsist from the stereotyping itself.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Everything done is as a provocation. This means that a dichotomous scenario of you reacting or being inactive are both considered and each of these is considered as being a winning outcome for the purveyor of unconventional warfare in the form of a dialectical attack.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# Dealing
|
|
|
+People never quite realize what they're dealing with when the context of every situation now includes an ideology that is cynically seeks complete transformation of society and, perhaps most importantly, is a system of thought which considers itself the only means of not practicing an ideology. Because of this, you must continuously declare obedience, demonstrate servitude, pledge allegiance to an
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This is because it has redefined ideology to mean the set of ideas and systems which resist submitting to their goal of totalitarianism, which they define as some form of spontaneous socialism (which itself has to be forced, so that the conditions for the spontaneity can be made).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As we previously mentioned, the objective is always to provoke a reaction. But you have only limited options for what to do:
|
|
|
+- nothing: do you have this luxury? Forever? Encroachment?
|
|
|
+- pre-emptive action
|
|
|
+- reaction
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# AI and Transhumanism
|
|
|
+March 26, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Do these get to be separate issues?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+It's best to be clear about what level of abstraction is used to understand each of these, because I do not think they are the same.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Transhumanism exists as the idea - the concept of changing the human being so that human capabilities transcend their limits. We can get into the weeds about why this might be sought or desired, but it is always the same concept: transcend limitations of the human form, such as it has evolved to have become what it is today.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+AI has concepts and ideas behind it, but it is most fundamentally technology. More specifically, it is the attempt to develop digital technology which mimics human thinking/human mind. One might opine over whether it is centered on creating or replicating the human mind, whether it is a reproduction of the human neural matrix or, more generally, an automated ability for a decision-making apparatus which can go beyond the limits of pre-programmed intervention.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+*Worth mentioning Bruno's theory that fantasy of creating self absent other sex involvement is expressed by males.*
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+We already do things equivalent to asserting minds have been read - more through double-meaning and overriding any presumption of reason. Now, we create evidene to take place of what would have otherwise been purely subjective. That means that, from that point onward, we have official mind-reading evidence available to the state in a standardized format, and we can only expect two things:
|
|
|
+- it will expand/become more sophisticated, and;
|
|
|
+- it will be used to improve the state's ability to predict us, and (bonus);
|
|
|
+- even for the state to generate inputs for our consumption in order to prompt us to provide it with the output it wants to see.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+If this begins (and it has in many respects), eventually the state will expect a minimum amount of data from each of us.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Transhumanism vs AI
|
|
|
+March 27, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Do they even compare? At different levels of abstraction. AI is transhumanism but the reverse is not also true.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Transhumanism: concept to transcend the inherent limitations of the bioevolutionarily created human being. Everything from medidicine to a walking stick to hyperbaric oxygen therapy to handheld devices to pacemakers to neural implants to prosthetics/prosthesis are successful implementations of transhumanism or things that bear some degree of being transhumanistic ie having relevance to understsanding ourselves as having capability beyond our inherent and discrete form.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The next step would be a more explicit and profound application of AI to human ability than what is currently evident.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+What would make for a good demarcation of this progression would be something which requires more of a commitment on the part of the person -> physical integration with the body, production and transmission of data that will be recognized as representing your state of being in REAL TIME to a governing entity, whether that be the state itself (sovereign) or something akin to a powerful company (the corporation!).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Religion of Resentment
|
|
|
+March 28, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Even if not all can explicitly see it for what it is, most likely intuit it at the level of sentiment and through resonance either of the expression or as is expressed within themselves when embodying the speaker of the word, actor of the performance and generator of the movement.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+In most cases it is the same - a victimization of one's existence necessitating a correction not from the self, as one is not accountable, and not from existence itself (as a reality) as it cannot yet be delivered, but from all other entities that share in having an experience (actualization of existence). It is fundamentally a childish sentiment which breeds unreasonable rage.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The sentiment necessarily reaches a characfter and strength of unrelenting hate and disgust for one's fellow man, and pity and loathing for the self, first out of discontent for self, and later out of attempting to ignore one's awareness to the fact that they are playing an ever more committed role of the petulant and ungrateful child. The anxiety comes from a never-resolving suspicion that as one traverses the path of constructing a simulacrum, one will never be able to reach the desired endpoint.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The only solution is to enforce the most hyper-real simulacra and a specific interpretation of it that is so totalizing and absolute that doubt cannot manifest to seed anxiety and uncertain again. This is the goal of totalitarianism.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## The Cult Religion
|
|
|
+April 2, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. Target initiates
|
|
|
+2. Introduce mythology. Codify world in its terms
|
|
|
+3. Place them in that world, inducing anxiety, guilt and anger
|
|
|
+4. Provide antidote:
|
|
|
+ a) ritual to affirm/confess
|
|
|
+ b) life-long commitment to purification (do the work)
|
|
|
+5. Work: Create conflict
|
|
|
+6. Replace family with found family
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Whole Child
|
|
|
+April 6, 2023
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Whole implies that this framework has a more complete understanding of the matter than similar frameworks, or those it intends to supplant.
|
|
|
+- Asserts that there are goals that cannot be attained due to certain impediments -> systemic forces
|
|
|
+- Anything not applying the same theory is the systemic force, by default
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Generative
|
|
|
+Data-mining - what makes your child tick?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Any prospect of uncovering or declaring a new identity becomes evidence that the whole child is being addressed, because:
|
|
|
+1. It increases the quantity of aspects that have been assessed or touched upon and;
|
|
|
+2. even if it's wrong, it becomes an increment in the path of doing this work
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This all means that there will be a bias for seekign to declare new identities over something and though it can be so easily performed with simple redundancies, that practice creates momentum for identity declaration and the prospect of declaring a liberatory identity carries the weight of itself being a form of liberatory praxis based on the theories which inform the applied whole-child model.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Sin and Karma
|
logicp